Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Correlation limits

The closer two particles pass, the greater is their interaction. Still, AJ/J may turn out to be less than 1 even in the case of face to face collision. In this limit collisions are weak, y 1 and the model of the correlated process fits the situation well. If close impacts produce a strong effect, then the influence of more distant paths is negligible, and the process approaches the non-correlated limit y 0. [Pg.19]

The model calculated in this manner predicts that two minerals, alunite [KA13(0H)6(S04)2] and anhydrite (CaSC>4), are supersaturated in the fluid at 175 °C, although neither mineral is observed in the district. This result is not surprising, given that the fluid s salinity exceeds the correlation limit for the activity coefficient model (Chapter 8). The observed composition in this case (Table 22.1), furthermore, actually represents the average of fluids from many inclusions and hence a mixture of hydrothermal fluids present over a range of time. As noted in Chapter 6, mixtures of fluids tend to be supersaturated, even if the individual fluids are not. [Pg.321]

Since we have no direct information about the chemistry of the Fountain fluid, we assume that its composition reflects reaction with minerals in the evaporite strata that lie beneath the Lyons. We take this fluid to be a three molal NaCl solution that has equilibrated with dolomite, anhydrite, magnesite (MgCC>3), and quartz. The choice of NaCl concentration reflects the upper correlation limit of the B-dot (modified Debye-Hiickel) equations (see Chapter 8). To set pH, we assume a CO2 fugacity of 50, which we will show leads to a reasonable interpretation of the isotopic composition of the dolomite cement. [Pg.380]

NOE theory provides an exact energy functional for two-electron systems [76, 77]. In the weak correlation limit, the total energy is given by... [Pg.410]

Three major reviews exist which give detailed coverage of the literature available up to about 1955. In particular, the review by Gresham et al. (G7) may be consulted for empirical correlations limited to specific flow patterns, and the papers by Isbin et al. (II) and by Bennett (B9) are particularly valuable for aspects of two-phase flow related to steam-water systems. Bennett has also given useful tabulations of available correlations (up to 1957) for the estimation of two-phase pressure drops. [Pg.204]

We have remarked above that the Taft Es values suffered from a number of deficiencies. In fact, the only direct evidence that they were a measure of steric effects was their successful correlation with rv values, a correlation limited to symmetrical top tetrahedral substituents such as CH3 and CF3 and to H. The evidence presented above indicates that rv values are a useful measure of steric effects and suggested that they might be used directly as steric parameters in correlation analysis. They were so used by Charton 6,n,13,14). They did meet the first and third criteria for steric parameters in full and the fourth in part. They did not meet the second, fifth and sixth, however. The Taft Es values met the first criteria only if it could be assumed that the use by Taft of average values of data obtained under different experimental conditions was valid. Our results indicate that this is not the case. Es values did meet the third condition, but were unable to meet the other criteria. It seemed more reasonable to base a set of steric parameters on the van der Waals radii than to do so upon Es values and to attempt to remove their deficiencies. By defining a set of steric parameters, designated values, from the equation... [Pg.66]

P. Piecuch, J. Cizek, and J. Paldus, Int. ]. Quantum Chem., 42, 165 (1992). Behaviour of the Coupled Cluster Energy in the Strong Correlated Limit of the Cyclic Polyene Model. Comparison with the Exact Results. [Pg.291]

Figure 5 Diamagnetic rings currents, Nx z), of half-filled Pariser-Parr-Pople models for regular polygons with D h symmetry. The dashed line at 2 = U/4 t0 = 1.17 corresponds to standard parameters z = 0 is the Hiickel limit of free electrons, while z 1 is the strong-correlation limit of antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin chain with vanishing ring currents [50]. Figure 5 Diamagnetic rings currents, Nx z), of half-filled Pariser-Parr-Pople models for regular polygons with D h symmetry. The dashed line at 2 = U/4 t0 = 1.17 corresponds to standard parameters z = 0 is the Hiickel limit of free electrons, while z 1 is the strong-correlation limit of antiferromagnetic Heisenberg spin chain with vanishing ring currents [50].
An excellent statistical fit to data is therefore insufficient to render a packing pressure drop correlation suitable for design. In addition to a good fit to data, the correlation limitations must be fully explored. Most published packing pressure drop correlations fail miserably here their limitations are often unknown, and if known, are seldom reported. [Pg.492]

Interpolation of actual experimental data circumvents the systematic correlation limitations, gives reliable and accurate pressure drop prediction, is difficult to computerize, and requires that suitable interpolation charts are available. This saction deals with predicting pressure drop by correlation. Section 8,2.9 describes interpolating experimental pressure drop data. [Pg.492]

The Robbins interpolation procedure overcomes many of his correlation limitations (Sec, 8.2.8). The packing factor is eliminated and so are any associated inaccuracies (Sec. 8.2.10). The inaccuracy of the liquid rate dependence for low dry packing factors (F < 15) is no longer a problem, because experimental data are directly interpolated to establish this dependence. Any inaccuracies in gsneralizing Fig. 8.20... [Pg.503]

With the busy life style and the pressure to publish papers, the problem is becoming more acute. There are deadlines to meet, technical papers need to be produced, and there is no time to explore correlation limitations. Besides, who needs to look for limitations when a computerized regression analysis (performed, of course, by one of the best regression packages in the business) shows an excellent data fit Does it really matter if a handful of points do not fit the correlation— even if this handful includes all the points for systems above atmospheric pressures In real life, no one will know, unless the designer ends up with a column that does not work. And if the error is on the conservative side, no one will ever find out, because the column will work,... [Pg.730]

We have tested this idea using PPP model Hamiltonians, obtaining the 3- and 4-body clusters by cluster analyzing simple PPP-VB wave functions. We carefully explored a number of typical systems for the whole range of the coupling constant. Clearly, it is the highly correlated limit (f3 —t 0), where the standard CCSD fails, but where PPP-VB works best, that we obtain excellent results. [Pg.494]

So far boundary conditions for gas phase calculations are taken from measurements or empirical correlation, limiting the application only to specific cases. Therefore the aim of the current project is to develop a numerical model, which predicts the conversion of the solid fuel in the packed bed. The model should take different operating parametors and main fuel properties, such as size and humidity of the fuel particles, into account. [Pg.586]

Souders and Brown introduced the relationship C%ax = KV JD / D — Dv), a modified kinetic energy ratio to correlate limiting entrainment rates for various systems. In this relationship V is the vapor velocity is the vapor density and Dj is the liquid density. [Pg.273]

Correlation is a much more difficult problem than exchange, so exact analytic forms of e r° (p) are known only for two hmiting cases. The first is the high-density (weak correlation) limit of a spin-compensated UEG... [Pg.684]

The second case is the low-density (strong correlation) limit obtained by Nozieres and Pines [110] and Carr [111]... [Pg.684]

Thus, the results stated above have shown the possibility of the linear dependence of on parameter, characterizing polymer-solvent interactions level, plotting. The indicated correlation limits correspond to the theoretical limiting values These circumstances allow using the correlation for prediction structure of macromolecular coil in diluted... [Pg.69]


See other pages where Correlation limits is mentioned: [Pg.83]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.566]    [Pg.570]    [Pg.705]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.502]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.288]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.490]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.234]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.199]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.77 ]




SEARCH



Correlation consistent basis sets limit

Correlation diagrams limitations

Correlation energy density limit

Correlation upper limit

Correlator hardware limitation

Exchange-correlation energy limit

Limiting-current measurement correlations established

Limits on Activity Coefficient Correlations, the Gibbs-Duhem Equation

Multiple correlations analysis limitations

Orbital correlation diagrams limitations

Spin resolution, correlation energy uniform density limit

Symmetrized correlation function classical limit

Time correlation functions limits

© 2024 chempedia.info