Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Corps of Engineers’ Final Report

First, the Corps of Engineers Final Report of Analytical Results ( Report ) was dated May 8, 2002. Relevant data from this report was transmitted to only one of the property owners, 48th Street, on or about January 14, 2003. The property owner transmitted his portion of the data to the District of Columbia Department of Health on January 23, 2003. At the partnering meeting on January 29, 2003, the District expressed concern over the delay and means of obtaining even a portion of the Report. Also, concern was expressed over the more important delay in notifying the four property owners. [Pg.203]

Draft Comments on the Corps of Engineers Final Report of Analytical Results Dated May 8, 2002 3819 48th Street 4710 Quebec Street 4625 Rockwood Parkway and 4633 Rockwood Parkway, DC Environmental Health Administration, February 2003. [Pg.239]

Bank, L. C., Borowicz, D. T., Arora, D. and Lamanna, A. J. (2003), Strengthening of concrete beams with fasteners and composite material strips - Scaling and anchorage issues , US Army Corps of Engineers, Final Report, Contract Number DACA42-02-P-0064. [Pg.655]

Thibodeaux, L.J. Ravikrishna, R. Valsaraj, K.T. Volatilization Rates from Dredged Material and Soils—A Literature Review. Final Report. U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Chicago District. Monitored by USA ERDC, WES 3909 Halls Ferry Road, Vicksburg, MS, U.S.A. February 1, 2002. [Pg.898]

A very extensive field research program was completed early in 1979, and the final report (prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers by Woodward-Clyde Consultants) was made available to the public in 1980 [1]. Within the limiting parameters determined by the contract, the specific purpose of the researchf and the grout pumping plant,J an extensive amount of data was gathered to evaluate not only the effectiveness of field procedures but the precision of various methods for evaluation of grouting effectiveness. [Pg.509]

Jenkins TF et al., Characterization of Explosives Contamination at Military Firing Ranges, ERDC TR-01-5, Final/Technical Report, Engineer Research and Development Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hanover, NH, 2001. [Pg.172]

U.S. EPA. (2002a). Final Design Analysis, Thermal Remediation Pilot Stndy, PN C1871, Soil and Groundwater Operable Units. Wyckoff/Eagle Harbor Snperfnnd Site, Bainbridge Island, WA. Report to EPA by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. [Pg.535]

In 1996, the District of Columbia vigorously attacked the Army Corps of Engineer s conclusion of no further action in that same Final Report on the World War I Poison Gas Production at the AUES. Since then, the District s main contentions— that there were significant quantities of munitions, chemical glassware, and arsenic contamination remaining— have been proven to be 100 percent correct. [Pg.148]

Kingman, D.C. (1900). Final Report on Survey of Hiwassee River TN. US War Dept., US Army Corps of Engineers Washington DC. [Pg.508]

Final Report, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, MS., Feb.1983. [Pg.471]


See other pages where Corps of Engineers’ Final Report is mentioned: [Pg.149]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.77]   


SEARCH



Corps of Engineers

Corpses

Final reports

© 2024 chempedia.info