Control strategy criteria

A classical approach to this problem involves developing a se wence of models, as shown in Fig. 2. The first step in this chain, labelled 1 in the figure, is the development of a fundamental model Mf describing the dynamic interplay between dominant chemical and physical process phenomena. This model is optimized with respect to the first two model validity criteria— ability to predict process behavior accurately and physical interpretability—and advances in model development tools are improving the quality of fundamental models with respect to the fourth criterion (ease of development). Because their complexity is determined by process details, however, fundamental models typically suffer badly with respect to the third criterion they are not directly compatible with most model-based control strategies. 

With these four strategies comphance with Part 11 can be cost-effectively integrated into the management of any automated laboratory, and while primary consideration must be paid to compliance with requirements and to adding safety controls as necessary beyond those requirements, cost-effectiveness can appropriately be utdized as a third-level criterion in laboratory system selection, design, and management. 

Generally, an objective function is required for the adaptation strategy which guides the adaptation mechanism to produce the best settings of the controller parameters. For example, the A decay ratio specification could be employed, or the ISE criterion (Section 7.11). For instance, if the A decay ratio criterion is used, then, if any change in process parameters leads to decay ratios other than A, the adaptation mechanism adjusts the controller parameters until a A decay ratio in the controlled response is achieved once again. 

The first type of task is to solve the formabllity problems , i.e., to find some mathematical model or criterion for the stability of some unknown molecules or chemical substances. The second type of task is the property prediction , i.e., to make mathematical models for the structure-property relationships and use these models to predict the property of new materials (or the inverse problem to search the unknown new materials with some pre-assigned property). The third type of task is to solve the optimization problems , i.e., to find the conditions for optimizing some properties of certain materials. The fourth type of task is to solve the problem of control , i.e., is to find the mathematical model to control some index of materials within a desired range. And the fifth type of task is to find the multivariate relationships between the conditions of preparation and the properties of materials. Different SVM techniques should be used for these different purposes. In the following sections, we will use different examples of materials design tasks to demonstrate various strategies of solution by SVM technique. 

This evaluation criterion is another way of noting the airport operator s role and thus ability to control the strategy and associated emissions. The rating indicates typical airport conditions (e.g., the airport operator typically does not control pre-conditioned air systems) however, the research team acknowledges that actual control may vary depending on the operating environment at the airport. The plane icons indicate the authority/control that the airport operator would have over implementation of the strategy ... 

Sjohania and his colleagues [28] analysed 100 reviews of questions published between 1995 and 2005 on recommended treatment strategies in multiple medical specialties, limiting themselves to the best randomised or semi-randomised controlled trials. They used two assessment criteria quantitative, defined as whether or not a change in the clinical result by more than 50 % occurred in relation to at least one criterion as compared with the initial review, and qualitative, which considered efficacy, the identification of... 

---