Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Connectivity-polarizability approach

Three major approaches to the prediction of aqueous solubility of organic chemicals using Quantitative Structure Activity Relationship (QSAR) techniques arc reviewed. The rationale behind six QSAR models derived from these three approaches, and the quality of their fit to the experimental data are summarized. Their utility and predictive ability are examined and compared on a common basis. Three of the models employed octanol-water partition coefficient as the primary descriptor, while two others used the solvatochromic parameters. The sixth model utilized a combination of connectivity indexes and a modified polarizability parameter. Considering the case of usage, predictive ability, and the range of applicability, the model derived from the connectivity- polarizability approach appears to have greater utility value. [Pg.478]

To display properties on molecular surfaces, two different approaches are applied. One method assigns color codes to each grid point of the surface. The grid points are connected to lines chicken-wire) or to surfaces (solid sphere) and then the color values are interpolated onto a color gradient [200]. The second method projects colored textures onto the surface [202, 203] and is mostly used to display such properties as electrostatic potentials, polarizability, hydrophobidty, and spin density. [Pg.135]

Several groups have developed correlations specifically for PCBs. Sabljic and Gusten (1989) applied a similar approach to Nirmalakhandan and Speece, using two, fourth order connectivity indices and obtained a correlation with a standard error of 0.31 log units. Dun-nivant et al. (1992) also have used connectivity and polarizability. [Pg.98]

A new approach to the theory of high-7 superconductivity in cuprate oxides is proposed, based on the possibility of superelectrons derived from inner closed shells in shrunken atoms induced h 2 strong screened attractive interaction between an electron and an ion. An electrostatic fluctuation connected with an electronic polarizability halts the breaking-up of the pre-existing pairs of electrons with antjparalle) spins in the shells. The transport of superelectrons can be explained by the virtual tunneling. [Pg.197]

The approach which will be reviewed here has been formulated within the framework of the quantum mechanical polarizable continuum model (PCM) [7], Within this method, the effective properties are introduced to connect the outcome of the quantum mechanical calculations on the solvated molecules to the outcome of the corresponding NLO experiment [8], The correspondence between the QM-PCM approach and the semi-classical approach will also be discussed in order to show similarities and differences between the two approaches. [Pg.238]

To examine the role of the LDOS modification near a metal nanobody and to look for a rationale for single molecule detection by means of SERS, Raman scattering cross-sections have been calculated for a hypothetical molecule with polarizability 10 placed in a close vicinity near a silver prolate spheroid with the length of 80 nm and diameter of 50 nm and near a silver spherical particle with the same volume. Polarization of incident light has been chosen so as the electric field vector is parallel to the axis connecting a molecule and the center of the silver particle. Maximal enhancement has been found to occur for molecule dipole moment oriented along electric field vector of Incident light. The position of maximal values of Raman cross-section is approximately by the position of maximal absolute value of nanoparticle s polarizability. For selected silver nanoparticles it corresponds to 83.5 nm and 347.8 nm for spheroid, and 354.9 nm for sphere. To account for local incident field enhancement factor the approach described by M. Stockman in [4] has been applied. To account for the local density of states enhancement factor, the approach used for calculation of a radiative decay rate of an excited atom near a metal body [9] was used. We... [Pg.165]

We show how the response of a molecule to an external oscillating electric field can be described in terms of intrinsic properties of the molecules, namely the (hyper)polarizabilities. We outline how these properties are described in the case of exact states by considering the time-development of the exact state in the presence of a time-dependent electric field. Approximations introduced in theoretical studies of nonlinear optical properties are introduced, in particular the separation of electronic and nuclear degrees of freedom which gives rise to the partitioning of the (hyper)polarizabilities into electronic and vibrational contributions. Different approaches for calculating (hyper)polarizabilities are discussed, with a special focus on the electronic contributions in most cases. We end with a brief discussion of the connection between the microscopic responses of an individual molecule to the experimentally observed responses from a molecular ensemble... [Pg.1]

Apart from primary structural and energetic data, which can be extracted directly from four-component calculations, molecular properties, which connect measured and calculated quantities, are sought and obtained from response theory. In a pilot study, Visscher et al. (1997) used the four-component random-phase approximation for the calculation of frequency-dependent dipole polarizabilities for water, tin tetrahydride and the mercury atom. They demonstrated that for the mercury atom the frequency-dependent polarizability (in contrast with the static polarizability) cannot be well described by methods which treat relativistic effects as a perturbation. Thus, the varia-tionally stable one-component Douglas-Kroll-Hess method (Hess 1986) works better than perturbation theory, but differences to the four-component approach appear close to spin-forbidden transitions, where spin-orbit coupling, which the four-component approach implicitly takes care of, becomes important. Obviously, the random-phase approximation suffers from the lack of higher-order electron correlation. [Pg.86]

In this approach, the solute-solvent interactions are modeled using polarizability and the molar volume of the solute. Polarizability, O, is in turn modeled by Ketelaar s method (13). where an atomic contribution scheme is employed. Molar volume is in turn modeled by molecular connectivity indices, %, which are calculated using slightly modified algorithms (9), originally proposed by Kicr and Hall (14.15). These indices encode information on the molecular topology and its hctcroatom content. They have been shown to correlate well with the solutes molar volume, and... [Pg.480]

An alternative to fingerprint based similarities are those based on BCUTs (Burden, CAS, University of Texas). This method uses a modified connectivity matrix (the Burden matrix) onto which are mapped atomic descriptors (such as atomic mass and polarizability) and connectivity information. The eigenvectors of this matrix represent a compressed summary of the information in the matrix and are used to describe a molecule. Typically 5-6 BCUT descriptors suffice to describe the chemical space of a set of molecules, and the space is usually partitioned into distinct bins , with each molecule assigned to the appropriate partition. In this format, similarity calculations become very simple molecules which are mapped into the same partition are similar. As an alternative, one could use larger numbers of molecular properties and a correlation vector approach. [Pg.370]


See other pages where Connectivity-polarizability approach is mentioned: [Pg.480]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.480]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.483]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.1182]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.75]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.480 ]




SEARCH



Connectivity Approach

© 2024 chempedia.info