Conformational induction

Between R and R there are only small differences in energy. This can be seen by single amino acid mutations leading to constitutive receptor activity [12-14]. Conformational selection and conformational induction, however, are not necessarily in contradiction. Both can be seen as two parts of one mechanism in which the active conformation of a receptor is induced during the binding process, whereas the ligand preferably binds to the active conformation [15]. 

Bruns, R.F., Conformational induction versus conformational selection evidence from allosteric enhancers. Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 17, 189, 1996. 

Experimental results are in general conformity with the Avrami equation, but the interpretation of various observations is still complicated in many instances. One intriguing observation is that the induction period for nucleation is inversely proportional to the length of time the liquid is held in the liquid state after previous melting. This dependence on prior history may be qualitatively understood... 

It is interesting to speculate that asymmetric induction may be the consequence of the exo anomeric effect, a stereoelectronic effect that favors the conformation 5 that places the aglycone O-C bond antiperiplanar to the pyran C(1) —C(2) bond7fi. Related asymmetric induction has also been observed in aldehyde addition reactions of the related, but racemic, pinacol (Z)-y-(tetrahydropyranyloxy)allylboronate49. As indicated in the examples above, however, the level of diastereoselectivity is modest and the only application in asymmetric synthesis is Wuts exo-brevicomin synthesis75. 

Phenyllithium and phenylcopper boron trifluoride yield different diastereomers of the reaction products, i.c., the sense of asymmetric induction is a function of the metal. These results are rationalized on the basis of antiperiplanar 6 and synperiplanar 8 reactive enoate conformations for additions of the copper and lithium reagents, respectively. 

The sense of the asymmetric induction at the /J-carbon of 10 is opposite to that of 7, indicating that 10 reacts with the Gilman reagents in a conformation where the carbonyl is s-trans to the a,(i double bond to avoid steric repulsion of the a-substituent and the camphor residue. 

The asymmetric induction that has been observed in this reaction can be explained in terms of the model shown in Scheme 9. In the most stable conformation the appropriately positioned phenyl group shields selectively the Re,Re face of the chromadiene by 7r,7r-orbital overlap forcing the nucleophile to attack preferentially on the opposite side. 

The first approach applied for [cinchonidine (CD) - a-keto ester] complex was also unsuccessful. In the open conformation CD cannot provide the required steric shielding. In open form either the quinuclidine or the quinoline moiety of CD will interact with the substrate. It has already been demonstrated that the quinuclidine moiety has a crucial role both in the rate acceleration and the induction of ED [13]. 

The inductive and electrostatic effects, steric constraints and conjugative interactions are the major factors that determine the configurational stability of a-sulfonyl carbanions. These are thought to be pyramidal with appreciable electrostatic inhibition to racemization by way of inversion. LCAO-MO-SCF calculations have indicated the conformer 195 in which the lone pair is directed along the bisector of the OSO angle to be the most stable in acyclic sulfones. ... 

PI. 5.1 Receptor activation a model proposed for the induction of OR conformational changes following odourant attachment to binding site on ciliary membrane (from TUrin, 1996). 

---