Configuration interaction performance

The oscillator strengths obtained for the different transitions studied in the present work with the RQDO methodology, and the use of the two forms of the transition operator, the standard one, and that corrected for core-valence polarization, are collected in Tables 1 to 8, where other data, from several theoretical and experimental sources, have been included for comparative purposes. The former comprise the large-scale configuration interaction performed with the use of the CIVS computer package [19] by Hibbert and Hansen [20] The configuration interaction (Cl) procedure of... 

HyperChem always com putes the electron ic properties for the molecule as the last step of a geometry optimization or molecular dyn am ics calcu lation. However, if you would like to perform a configuration interaction calculation at the optimized geometry, an additional sin gle poin t calcu lation is requ ired with theCI option being turned on. 

A single-excitation configuration interaction (CIS) calculation is probably the most common way to obtain excited-state energies. This is because it is one of the easiest calculations to perform. 

The HE, GVB, local MP2, and DFT methods are available, as well as local, gradient-corrected, and hybrid density functionals. The GVB-RCI (restricted configuration interaction) method is available to give correlation and correct bond dissociation with a minimum amount of CPU time. There is also a GVB-DFT calculation available, which is a GVB-SCF calculation with a post-SCF DFT calculation. In addition, GVB-MP2 calculations are possible. Geometry optimizations can be performed with constraints. Both quasi-Newton and QST transition structure finding algorithms are available, as well as the SCRF solvation method. 

The UHF option allows only the lowest state of a given multiplicity to be requested. Thus, for example, you could explore the lowest Triplet excited state of benzene with the UHF option, but could not ask for calculations on an excited singlet state. This is because the UHF option in HyperChem does not allow arbitrary orbital occupations (possibly leading to an excited single determinant of different spatial symmetry than the lowest determinant of the same multiplicity), nor does it perform a Configuration Interaction (Cl) calculation that allows a multitude of states to be described. 

The next step might be to perform a configuration interaction calculation, in order to get a more accurate representation of the excited states. We touched on this for dihydrogen in an earlier chapter. To do this, we take linear combinations of the 10 states given above, and solve a 10 x 10 matrix eigenvalue problem to find the expansion coefficients. The diagonal elements of the Hamiltonian matrix are given above (equation 8.7), and it turns out that there is a simplification. 

The K-matrix method is essentially a configuration interaction (Cl) performed at a fixed energy lying in the continuum upon a basis of "unperturbed funetions that (at the formal level) includes both diserete and eontinuous subsets. It turns the Schrodinger equation into a system of integral equations for the K-matrix elements, which is then transformed into a linear system by a quadrature upon afinite L basis set. 

Basically, the configuration interaction procedure can be performed by using any orthogonal set of orbitals to construct the determinants d (l... w). We shall now continue to show that the set of SCF-LCA-MO s determined in the last section is a particularly convenient choice. 

The low-lying excited states of the hydrogen molecule conhned in the harmonic potential were studied using the configuration interaction method and large basis sets. Axially symmetric harmonic oscillator potentials were used. The effect of the confinement on the geometry and spectroscopic constants was analyzed. Detailed analysis of the effect of confinement on the composition of the wavefunction was performed. 

The precise quantum cluster calculations of the electronic structure of SC ceramics were performed in Refs. [13,17,21]. Guo et al. [13] used the generalized valence bond method, Martin and Saxe [17] and Yamamoto et al. [21] performed calculations at the configuration interaction level. But in these studies the calculations were carried out for isolated clusters, the second aspect of the ECM scheme, see above, was not fulfilled. The influence of crystal surrounding may considerably change the results obtained. 

Overall, we seem to find reasons to be hopeful about the possibilities of the RQDO formalism for predicting spectral properties of complex atoms. Very recently, some lifetime calculations in Yb 11 have also been successfully performed [30]. These reasons rest on the correctness of the results so far obtained, as well as the low computational expense and avoidance of the frequent convergence problems that are common in configuration interaction approaches. 

---