Confidence prior specification

Assuming at this point that a highly purified sample of phosphatidylserine has been obtained from a specific biological source, structural chracterization of this preparation can be undertaken with ease and confidence. Prior to delving into the latter topic, a few general comments are appropriate at this time. 

Usually there is no opportunity to repeat the measurements to determine the experimental variance or standard deviation. This is the most common situation encountered in field measurements. Each measurement is carried out only once due to restricted resources, and because field-measured quantities are often unstable, repetition to determine the spread is not justified. In such cases prior knowledge gained in a laboratory with the same or a similar meter and measurement approach could be used. The second alternative is to rely on the specifications given by the instrument manufacturer, although instrumenr manufacturers do not normally specify the risk level related to the confidence limits they are giving. 

The termination constants kt found previously (see Table XVII, p. 158) are of the order of 3 X10 1. mole sec. Conversion to the specific reaction rate constant expressed in units of cc. molecule" sec. yields A f=5X10". At the radical concentration calculated above, 10 per cc., the rate of termination should therefore be only 10 radicals cc. sec., which is many orders of magnitude less than the rate of generation of radicals. Hence termination in the aqueous phase is utterly negligible, and it may be assumed with confidence that virtually every primary radical enters a polymer particle (or micelle). Moreover the average lifetime of a chain radical in the aqueous phase (i.e., 10 sec.) is too short for an appreciable expectation of addition of a dissolved monomer molecule by the primary radical prior to its entrance into a polymer particle. 

Once a chemical submodel has been developed, it must be tested extensively prior to its application in comprehensive computer models of an air basin or region. This is done by testing the chemical submodel predictions against the results of environmental chamber experiments. While agreement with the chamber experiments is necessary to have some confidence in the model, such agreement is not sufficient to confirm that the chemistry is indeed correct and applicable to real-world air masses. Some of the uncertainties include those introduced by condensing the organic reactions, uncertainties in kinetics and mechanisms of key reactions (e.g., of aromatics), and how to take into account chamber-specific effects such as the unknown radical source. 

With a new supply source or a new material, a pharmaceutical company will usually want to audit the supplier, prior to accepting the material on a CofA. They may even want to repeat some of the tests on the CofA until there is confidence on compliance with the specification. The pharmaceutical company will want to seek assurance from the supplier that they are quality conscious at every stage of their process, and have the facilities and internal systems and procedures in place to be able to support this. 

Documented evidence is achieved by preparing written validation protocols prior to doing the work, and writing final reports at the completion of the work. Information must be in writing, otherwise it does not exist, according to the FDA. The process equipment used should undergo installation qualification (IQ) and operational qualification (OQ) to establish confidence that the equipment was installed to specification and purpose and is capable of operating within established limits required by the process. Performance characteristics which may be measured could be uniformity of speed for a mixer or the temperature and pressure of an autoclave, for example. 

Confidence intervals serve another useful purpose. They can assist one in determining whether the population mean may equal a specific value. To illustrate, suppose prior to the collection of the example data, one wished to determine whether the population mean might be equal to 25. Since 25 does not fall within the confidence interval for the population mean, one could feel reasonably confident that, based on the data, the population mean did not equal 25. 

For structure-activity correlations, the IGC50 values were transformed to millimoles per liter prior to taking the log of the inverse (log BR). Model adequacy was measured by the coefficient of determination (r ) for all possible combinations of descriptors (X) and log 6R (Y), using the r procedure in SAS. The general linear model of regression analysis from SAS was used to generate the specific equation estimates, as well as predicted values and confidence limits. 

---