Confidence interval about mean

Calculate the mean, the standard deviation, and the 95% confidence interval about the mean. What does this confidence interval mean ... 

Expected Variability of Measurement (Coefficient Distribution of Variation) (Model) 95% Confidence Interval About the Mean Estimate (percent) ... 

The command CONFIDENCE, a, n) gives the confidence interval about the mean for a sample size n. To obtain 95 percent confidence limits, use a =. 025 2a = 1 - A. 

Once the reliability of a replicate set of measurements has been established the mean of the set may be computed as a measure of the true mean. Unless an infinite number of measurements is made this true mean will always remain unknown. However, the t-factor may be used to calculate a confidence interval about the experimental mean, within which there is a known (90%) confidence of finding the true mean. The limits of this confidence interval are given by ... 

Confidence Intervals (or Bands). The 80% confidence interval about the true mean for each individual block is calculated. Since the kriging is done on the natural logarithm, the kriging standard deviation is multiplicative and the 80% confidence interval is approximately... 

Confidence intervals can be generated for any population parameter. Specifically, a two-sided confidence interval about the mean is an interval that contains the true unknown mean with a specified degree of confidence, 100(1 - a)%. The form of this equation, which depends on the sampling plan, is as follows. For sampling plan 1... 

Note for any stated confidence level, the confidence interval about the mean is the narrowest interval, the prediction interval for a single future observation is wider, and the tolerance interval (to contain 95% of the population) is the widest.]... 

Potency can also be evaluated during validation. It is assumed that some number of composite assays are tested during validation. One criterion might be to generate a 100(1 - a)% confidence interval about the mean using all the potencies collected. This interval will contain the true batch potency with 100(1 - a)% confidence. This interval should be contained within the potency in-house or release limits. Enough potencies should be looked at to have sufficient power that this interval will be contained within the desired limits. 

Results of drag-drag interaction studies should be reported as 90% confidence intervals about the geometric mean ratio of the observed pharmacokinetic measures with (S+I) and without the interacting drug (S). Confidence intervals provide an estimate of the distribution of the observed systemic exposure measure ratio of S+I versus S alone and convey a probability of the magnitude of the interaction. 

Confidence interval A range of values about a sample mean which is believed to contain the population mean with a stated probability, such as 95% or 99%. The 95% confidence interval about the mean (.v) of n samples with standard deviation s is x /o.05".n lfs/v O- Uo5 i... 

To define confidence intervals about a mean and show how to use them to indicate measurement precision. 

Figure 4. Effects of mist treatments on the freezing temperatures needed to kill 50% of shoots (LTjq) harvested from red spruce seedlings on (a) 21 September, (b) 19 October, (c) 30 November, 1987. Dotted lines represent 95% confidence intervals about the mean. (Source Fowler et al. 1989).

XI. 1.4 It can be demonstrated that the confidence intervals about the correlation line is explainable almost completely by the inherent error in ffie smoke point and luminometer measurements. This means that if there is a fuel-type effect different for each of the two methods, it is small and masked by smoke point and luminometer number measurement errors. 

The precision limit P. The interval about a nominal result (single or average) is the region, with 95% confidence, within which the mean of many such results would fall, if the experiment were repeated under the same conditions using the same equipment. Thus, the precision limit is an estimate of the lack of repeatability caused by random errors and unsteadiness. 

The variance about the mean, and hence, the confidence limits on the predicted values, is calculated from all previous values. The variance, at any time, is the variance at the most recent time plus the variance at the current time. But these are equal because the best estimate of the current time is the most recent time. Thus, the predicted value of period t+2 will have a confidence interval proportional to twice the variance about the mean and, in general, the confidence interval will increase with the square root of the time into the future. 

Confidence interval The range about the mean within which a stated percentage of values would be expected to lie. For example, for a normal distribution, approximately 95% of values lie between 2s. 

Calculate the confidence interval (90%) about the mean of the data in question 3. 

A widely used a = 5 percent significance level produces a 95 percent confidence interval extending over t91 confidence interval for a standard normal distribution. Therefore, the normal approximation of the t-distribution is correct to 12 percent for m> 10 and to 4 percent for m> 30. 

A point which may need emphasis, stated clearly in Hunter ( 2 ), is the precise interpretation of the confidence band about the predicted amount. This is important since without a clearly understood meaning, the interval will not be useful for assessing the precision of the predicted amounts or concentrations nor for comparing the results from various laboratories. Another reason the user of these methods must understand the interpretation is because increased precision can be achieved in at least two ways -by additional replication of the standards, which reduces the width of the confidence band about the regression line, and by performing multiple determinations on the unknowns, which reduces the width of the interval about the mean instrument response of the unknown. The interval for U is then given by... 

Wegscheider fitted a cubic spline function to the logarithmically transformed sample means of each level. This method obviates any lack of fit, and so it is not possible to calculate a confidence band about the fitted curve. Instead, the variance in response was estimated from the deviations of the calibration standards from their means at an Ot of 0.05. The intersection of this response interval with the fitted calibration line determined the estimated amount interval. 

First, amount error estimations in Wegscheider s work were the result of only the response uncertainty with no regression (confidence band) uncertainty about the spline. His spline function knots were found from the means of the individual values at each level. Hence the spline exactly followed the points and there was no lack of fit in this method. Confidence intervals around spline functions have not been calculated in the past but are currently being explored ( 5 ). 

The confidence interval is a measure of the degree of assurance, or confidence, one may have in the process or power of the result. The confidence interval is expressed as a range of values about the mean and within which it is 95% certain that the true value of the result lies. The range may be wide, indicating uncertainty, or narrow, indicating relative... 

We have seen in the previous chapter that it is not possible to make a precise statement about the exact value of a population parameter, based on sample data, and that this is a consequence of the inherent sampling variation in the sampling process. The confidence interval provides us with a compromise rather than trying to pin down precisely the value of the mean p or the difference between two means — p2> for example, we give a range of values, within which we are fairly certain that the true value lies. 

We will first look at the way we calculate the confidence interval for a single mean p and then talk about its interpretation. Later in this chapter we will extend the methodology to deal with pj — p2 and other parameters of interest. 

Note the role played by the standard error in the formula for the confidence interval. We have previously seen that the standard error of the mean provides an indirect measure of the precision with which we have calculated the mean. The confidence interval has now translated the numerical value for the standard error into something useful in terms of being able to make a statement about where jl lies. A large standard error will lead to a wide confidence interval reflecting the imprecision and resulting poor information about the value of jjl. In contrast a... 

However, the GUM [Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement approach (ISO 1993a), which leads to the verbose statement concerning expanded uncertainty quoted above, might not have been followed, and all the analyst wants to to do is say something about the standard deviation of replicates. The best that can be done is to say what fraction of the confidence intervals of repeated experiments will contain the population mean. The confidence interval in terms of the population parameters is calculated as... 

Figure 2.6. Distribution about a mean in relation to a control limit. The areas indicated are the fractions of the distributions passing and failing, and so can be equated to the probabilities of the mean result B with 95% confidence interval, complying or not complying.

The previous discussion of standard deviation and related statistical analysis placed emphasis on estimating the reliability or precision of experimentally observed values. However, standard deviation does not give specific information about how close an experimental mean is to the true mean. Statistical analysis may be used to estimate, within a given probability, a range within which the true value might fall. The range or confidence interval is defined by the experimental mean and the standard deviation. This simple statistical operation provides the means to determine quantitatively how close the experimentally determined mean is to the true mean. Confidence limits (Lj and L2) are created for the sample mean as shown in Equations 1.6 and 1.7. 

---