Concentration area-average

In Equation 6, the dlffuslvlty and mobility are second rank tensors whose positional dependence is a consequence of the hydrodynamic wall effect and F represents the probabllllty that the Brownian particle, initially at some fixed point, will be at some position in space R at a later time t. At low concentrations, P is replaced by the number concentration, C (25). Conceptually the approach followed is similar to that developed by Brenner and Gaydos (25), however, one needs to include an expression for the flux of particles at the wall due to exchange with the pores. Upon averaging over the interstitial tube cross section of Figure 2, one arrives at the following expression (29) for the area averaged rate equation for the mobile phase transport. 

In Equation 7, solute concentrations are area averaged with the subscripts referring to the mobile or stationary phase, I Is the length of the dead end pores, and the dlffuslvltles and D... 

In these equations kei is the elimination rate constant and AUMC is the area under the first moment curve. A treatment of the statistical moment analysis is of course beyond the scope of this chapter and those concepts may not be very intuitive, but AUMC could be thought of, in a simplified way, as a measure of the concentration-time average of the time-concentration profile and AUC as a measure of the concentration average of the profile. Their ratio would yield MRT, a measure of the time average of the profile termed in fact mean residence time. Or, in other words, the time-concentration profile can be considered a statistical distribution curve and the AUC and MRT represent the zero and first moment with the latter being calculated from the ratio of AUMC and AUC. 

The importance of the catalytical depletion of O3 by DMS depends on the fraction of IO which reacts with DMS. This fraction is obtained by comparing the rates of reactions (1), (4) and (5) which convert IO into I. The rates for these reactions are 0.06, 0.06, and 0.2 s 1, respectively, with ki = 2 x 10 11 cm3 molecule-1 s-1, [IO] = 107 cm-3, [DMS] = 3 x 109 cm 3, and [NOl = 1.25 x 1010 cm-3. The Iq value is an average of die two independent studies 116.171 and the IO concentration appears to be a realistic upper limit as discussed latter in the text. The DMS concentration is a typical measured value (3-10.12-141 and the NO concentration is for rural continental areas (2Q). It can be seen that under the above conditions the reaction of IO with DMS could contribute as much as 19% to the conversion of IO into I in the marine atmosphere. However, in remote marine areas the concentration of NO can be much less (241 and consequently in such areas the contribution of the IO + DMS reaction will be greater. It has to be stressed that the values taken in this paper for atmospheric trace concentrations are averaged values, with the only objective to qualitatively estimate the potential atmospheric impact of the chemistry presented. 

Figure 3.29 (a) Oxygen concentration profile at the inlet and outlet of the compartments of the high-throughput micro reactor. The inlets of the sampling tubes have to penetrate into the compartments to minimize flow cross-over, (b) Area averaged oxygen concentration at one capillary outlet. Total flow velocity 50 (1), 75 (2) and 100 cm3 min-1 (3) [55] (by courtesy of ACS). 

The statistical calculation of the projection of the shadow border area, averaged by all space orientations gives eb = 3/4 [71]. All linear dimensions of foam vertexes are proportional to r and, therefore, the shadow area of the vertex is proportional to r2 at any orientation. Introducing the averaged over all special orientations shadow area of the vertex snr2 (where is a proportionality coefficient of the order of 1), an expression is obtained for the shadow area of vertexes in a foam column of a unit cross section and of length AL = en Scn dL (where C is the concentration of vertexes). Thus,... 

Concentration ( xg/mL) Peak Area Average Response Factors (RF) ... 

We studied area-averaged time series of tracer concentrations and spatial patterns of concentrations fields. The following IFS runs are compared with the MOZART concentrations ... 

Free tropospheric concentrations are low, probably less than 3 pmol moU and its residence time is short probably — 2 d. It is much higher in surface air close to areas of active production. Here concentrations can average 450 pmol moU ... 

AUC = area under the concentration-time curve (unless otherwise stated) Cmax = maximum concentration Cavg = average concentration Tmax = time to reach maximum concentration ... 

Surface microlayer samples have shown sulphur-gas anomaly patterns that are more closely related to known mineralisation than sulphur-gas patterns from deeper soil samples (Lovell, 1979). At Johnson Camp, Arizona, mineralisation is best expressed by sulphur compounds from the surface microlayer, while sulphur compounds from 0-5 cm reflect the same mineralisation to a lesser extent, and sulphur compounds from 30-40 cm show the least expression of the mineralisation. A comparison of concentrations of COS, CS2, and SO2 degassed from soils collected at depths of 0.5-2 cm and 30-40 cm at the same sites near Casa Grande, Arizona, showed almost identical patterns of sulphur-gas concentrations over a 150 km (58 square miles) area. Average concentrations of COS, CS2 and SO2 were slightly higher in the shallow samples than in the deeper samples (Hinkle, unpublished data, 1981). These data indicate that, at least in arid areas, surficial soil and microlayer samples are superior to deeper augered samples. 

The poblem stated above is sufficiently complex that a closed-form analytical solution in the time domain has not been found. For most purposes, the details of the radial distribution of solute are unimportant, and a description of the longitudinal dispersion of solute in terms of a local mean concentration (that is, radially averaged) will suffice. The most mathematically convenient mean concentration is an area-averaged concentration, defined as... 

The equations derived from radial averaging still contain the local concentration as a variable. To proceed further, approximations are developed to relate the local concentration to the area-averaged concentration. The approach used in earlier models... 

The domain of an atmospheric model—that is, the area that is simulated—varies from a few hundred meters to thousands of kilometers (Table 25.1). The computational domain usually consists of an array of computational cells, each having a uniform chemical composition. The size of these cells, that is, the volume over which the predicted concentrations are averaged, determines the spatial resolution of the model. Variation of concentrations at scales smaller than the model resolution cannot easily be resolved. For example, concentration variations over the Los Angeles basin cannot be described by a synoptic scale model that treats the entire area as one computational cell of uniform chemical composition. 

---