Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Component split matrix

An interesting aspect is the relation between the design of units and the quality specifications. The path of each impurity can be traced by paying attention to generation, exit points and accumulation in recycles. In this respect the component split matrix available in Aspen Plus [23] gives very useful information and is highly recommended. [Pg.328]

Figure 4.12 is redrawn in Figure 4.13, showing the fresh feeds, split-fraction coefficients and component flows. Note that the fresh feed g2ok represents the acetone and hydrogen generated in the reactor. There are 5 units so there will be 5 simultaneous equations. The equations can be written out in matrix form (Figure 4.14) by inspection of Figure 4.13. The fresh feed vector contains three terms. Figure 4.12 is redrawn in Figure 4.13, showing the fresh feeds, split-fraction coefficients and component flows. Note that the fresh feed g2ok represents the acetone and hydrogen generated in the reactor. There are 5 units so there will be 5 simultaneous equations. The equations can be written out in matrix form (Figure 4.14) by inspection of Figure 4.13. The fresh feed vector contains three terms.
Step 4 Copy the appropriate split-fractions and fresh feeds from the table of split-fractions and fresh feeds, Figure 4.15, into the component matrices, Figure 4.17. Copy the cell references, not the actual values. Using the cell references ensures that subsequent changes in the values in the primary table, Figure 4.15, will be copied automatically to the appropriate matrix. [Pg.181]

The d9 species (OC)2NiCHO has been prepared by the reaction of H atoms with Ni(CO)4 in a krypton matrix at 77 K. The complex is not thermally interconvertible with its isomer, HNi(CO)3, and EPR spectroscopy reveals that components in the xy plane of the principal g-values gzz = 2.0024(2) and gxx = gyy = 2.0207(2) split at 4K. Hence, structure (1004) was proposed. 411 The oxides KNa2[Ni02] and K3[Ni02] contain Ni1 with virtually linear coordination.24 2... [Pg.496]

In this paper we present the first application of the ZORA (Zeroth Order Regular Approximation of the Dirac Fock equation) formalism in Ab Initio electronic structure calculations. The ZORA method, which has been tested previously in the context of Density Functional Theory, has been implemented in the GAMESS-UK package. As was shown earlier we can split off a scalar part from the two component ZORA Hamiltonian. In the present work only the one component part is considered. We introduce a separate internal basis to represent the extra matrix elements, needed for the ZORA corrections. This leads to different options for the computation of the Coulomb matrix in this internal basis. The performance of this Hamiltonian and the effect of the different Coulomb matrix alternatives is tested in calculations on the radon en xenon atoms and the AuH molecule. In the atomic cases we compare with numerical Dirac Fock and numerical ZORA methods and with non relativistic and full Dirac basis set calculations. It is shown that ZORA recovers the bulk of the relativistic effect and that ZORA and Dirac Fock perform equally well in medium size basis set calculations. For AuH we have calculated the equilibrium bond length with the non relativistic Hartree Fock and ZORA methods and compare with the Dirac Fock result and the experimental value. Again the ZORA and Dirac Fock errors are of the same order of magnitude. [Pg.251]

In order to test the various approximations of the Coulomb matrix, all electron basis set and numerical scalar scaled ZORA calculations have been performed on the xenon and radon atom. The numerical results have been taken from a previous publication [7], where it should be noted that the scalar orbital energies presented here are calculated by averaging, over occupation numbers, of the two component (i.e. spin orbit split) results. Tables (1) and (2) give the orbital energies for the numerical (s.o. averaged) and basis set calculations for the various Coulomb matrix approximations. The results from table... [Pg.256]

Upon y-irradiation of 1 in a CF3CCI3 matrix at 77 K [78], a radical cation was formed, the ESR spectrum of which consisted of nine broad hyperfine components spaced by ca. 0.75 mT (g = 2.0029 0.002), and the corresponding proton END OR spectrum exhibited two essentially isotropic signals at 25.83 and 24.58 MHz. The detailed analysis of the ESR and END OR spectra disclosed that the initially formed radical cation 1+ had transformed into the tetramethyleneethane radical cation 94+ (Scheme 17). In CFCI3 and CF2CICFCI2 matrices 1+ persists up to 100 K [79]. On going from 1 to l+, the set of eight equivalent protons splits... [Pg.107]

The coherence transfer provides cross peaks which are antiphase for the various 7//-split components. The antiphase nature of the cross peaks then leads to partial or total cancellation of the cross peaks themselves, especially if they are phased in the absorption mode. This behavior can be simulated (Fig. 8.15) using appropriate treatments of the time evolution of the spin system, for instance using the density matrix formalism [17,18]. It is quite common that signals in paramagnetic systems... [Pg.284]

The spin-orbit coupling term in the Hamiltonian induces the coupling of the orbital and spin angular momenta to give a total angular momentum J = L + S. This results in a splitting of the Russell-Saunders multiplets into their components, each of which is labeled by the appropriate value of the total angular momentum quantum number J. The character of the matrix representative (MR) of the operator R(0 n) in the coupled representation is... [Pg.148]

In the octahedral CF the ground term 6Aig is not split by the spin-orbit interaction by means of the bilinear spin-spin interaction. Consequently all the MPs vanish gz - ge = gx - ge = D = E = /tip = 0. This is caused by the fact that the angular momentum components of the type (6A[g Lfj 4Ty) and (6Aig ifl 2Ty) vanish exactly due to the orthogonality of the spin functions of different spin multiplicities. Therefore, the simple SH formalism does not work properly, and we are left with the problem of a complete spin-orbit interaction matrix between the CFTs of different spin multiplicities. [Pg.129]


See other pages where Component split matrix is mentioned: [Pg.170]    [Pg.395]    [Pg.805]    [Pg.733]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.402]    [Pg.739]    [Pg.1253]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.903]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.489]    [Pg.1106]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.197]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.326 ]




SEARCH



Matrix component

© 2024 chempedia.info