Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Complex reflection and transmission coefficient

In general, the quantities being determined by microwave measurements are complex reflection and transmission coefficients or complex impedances normalized to the impedances of the transmission lines connecting a network analyser and the device-under-test (dut). In addition to linear frequency domain measurements by means of a network analyser the determination of possible non-linear device (and thus material) properties requires more advanced measure-... [Pg.108]

When light is incident from the ambient side in the positive x direction, there is no wave propagating in the negative x direction inside the substrate. This means that Em+1 = 0. For the whole layered structure, the resulting complex reflection and transmission coefficients can be expressed by using the matrix elements of the total system transfer matrix of (6.8) ... [Pg.254]

Similarly, if one or both of the media are absorptive the analysis becomes more complicated. As we will now demonstrate, the sound speed then becomes a complex quantity. Hence the impedance of the media will also become a complex quantity, and the reflection and transmission coefficients will similarly be complex. [Pg.211]

The method is based on the magnetorefractive effect (MRE). The MRE is the variation of the complex refractive index (dielectric function) of a material due to change in its conductivity at IR frequencies when a magnetic field is applied. A direct measure of the changes of dielectric properties of a material can be performed by determining its reflection and transmission coefficients. Hence, IR transmission or reflection spectroscopy can provide a direct tool for probing the spin-dependent conductivity in GMR and TMR [5,6]. [Pg.276]

Despite the first presentation of the network analyser in 1965, the large-band measurement techniques only appeared in 1974. After ameliorations on the accuracy and the development of Von Hippel s methods, the first data treatments were proposed. Weir [III] and Nicholson [112] used the reflection and transmission coefficients (S parameters) resulting when a test sample was inserted into a waveguide or a TEM transmission line as shown in Figure 8.7 From measurements, complex permittivity and permeability values were derived in the range from 50 MHz to 18 GHz. [Pg.379]

A method to solve the problem is to determine in the Fourier space the connection between the logarithm of refractive index values and the amplitude reflection and transmission coefficients, represented as complex wavelength-dependent functions. The global minimum of thus obtained dependence is then determined. The solution is an inhomogeneous layer, further transformed into a two-material system and subsequently subjected to a new procedure of fine optimization. [Pg.74]

The sign ambiguity in (2) can be resolved by noting that F < 1 (passivity requirement). From rectangular waveguide analysis, one can relate the relative (complex) constitutive parameters p and to the reflection and transmission coefficients ... [Pg.368]

The reflection and transmission of a plane wave at a planar tissue interface depend on the frequency, the polarization, and angle of incidence of the wave as well as the complex dielectric constant of the tissue. The reflection coefficient R from (and the transmission T through) an interface of two media with intrinsic impedance Z and Z2 are ... [Pg.250]

Diffuse reflection from powder sample is a complex combination of transmission, internal and external reflections, and scattering. It is dependent on the particle size, absorption and refractive indices of the studied material. The case of proper prepared powder diffuse reflection R carries the information primarily about the transmission spectrum of the sample (Willey 1976 Fuller and Griffiths 1978). The traditional method of the absorption spectra (K) calculation on the base of the diffuse reflection R is the Kubelka-Munk equation K = (1 - R)2S/2Rc, where S is the scattering coefficient, concentration of the studied material is c = 1 in our case. [Pg.235]

The transmission coefficient corrects for the number of complexes that pass over the barrier and are reflected back again before being deactivated to final products. Generally it is assumed that ic = 1. The RRK and Slater models for spontaneous decompositions need similar correction. [Pg.248]

In Fig. 1, we display the frequency dependence of the complex reflection coefficients, R(cd), for two different bend geometries. In particular, the reflection amplitude p(a>) of the roundish bend (b) vanishes at several resonance frequencies and we want to emphasize that at exactly these resonance frequencies, the phase of the reflection coefficient experiences a non-trivial discontinuity. The complex transmission coefficients T w) display an analogous behavior and, together with the reflection coefficients R(o)), completely determine the bends 5-matrix if we neglect the evanescent modes as discussed above. [Pg.61]

Using a similar approach as in the case of the top antireflection coating above, and assuming normal incidence at the boundary between two media, for instance medium 1 (photoresist) and medium 2 (BARC), the reflection (rj2) and transmission (ti2) coefficients are given by the Fresnel equations above [Eqs. (9.5) and (9.6)]. Multiplication of the reflection amplitude with its complex conjugate yields... [Pg.440]

The ray tubes formed by the incident and reflected rays in Fig. 35-3 (a) have the same z-directed cross-section, and, since 4 is complex, the power density in each varies as 14 p, as is clear from Table 13-2, page 292. We deduce from Eqs. (35-11) and (35-18) that the transmission coefficient is given by 1 — B/A for 0. < 0 < n/2, leading to the Fresnel coefficient... [Pg.674]

In deriving the TST rate-coefficient formula it was assumed that the rate of reaction is identical with the rate of passage of activated complexes in one direction [Eq. (3.48)]. If TST is evaluated in terms of reactive trajectories through a dividing surfaces in phase space (equivalent to a transition state) it can be shown that the theory is exact (Pechukas and Poliak, 1979), provided that all trajectories move into the product region and none of them are reflected. To allow for reflective failures in the free passage assumption, the conventional TST expression is multiplied by a transmission coefficient k... [Pg.151]


See other pages where Complex reflection and transmission coefficient is mentioned: [Pg.253]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.1457]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.1612]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.6223]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.6222]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.1033]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.314]    [Pg.371]    [Pg.221]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.270]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.108 ]




SEARCH



Complex reflectance coefficients

Complex reflection coefficient

Reflectance and Reflection

Reflection and transmission

Reflection coefficients

Reflection transmission

Transmission coefficient

© 2024 chempedia.info