Complex Reactions—Deciphering Mechanisms

To decipher this complexity, electrochemistry at the polarized liquid-liquid interface developed over the past two decades has been proven to be a powerful tool, as shown in elucidation of the mechanism of ion-pair extraction [1 ] and the response of ion-selective electrodes of liquid-membrane type to different types of ions [5 7]. Along this line, several attempts have been made to use polarized liquid liquid interfaces for studying two-phase Sn2 reactions [8-10], two-phase azo-coupling [11], and interfacial polymerizations [12]. Recently, kinetic aspects of complexation reactions in facilitated ion transfer with iono-phores and the rate of protonation of amines have been treated quantitatively [13-16]. Their theoretical framework, which was adapted from the theories of kinetic currents in polaro-graphy, can be directly applicable to analyze quantitatively the chemical reactions in the two-phase systems. In what follows is the introduction to recent advances in electrochemical studies of the chemical reactions at polarized liquid liquid interfaces, mainly focusing on... 

In closed systems H2S and thermally produced can remix and re-react at elevated temperatures. These back reactions depend on the minerals present and the dilution factor of the gas pressurized in the autoclave. It is, therefore, much more complex to decipher the mechanisms controlling the values of all fractions analyzed specially for closed systems (Nelson et al, 1995). 

Let s now consider a scenario where the same number of reactants are used as in the above example, but a different sequence is involved. Here the intermediate is formed in a second order reaction, and the intermediate converts to product in a first order reaction (Eq. 7.48). Eq. 7.49 expresses the rate of the reaction, and Eq. 7.50 expresses the SSA. Solving Eq. 7.50 for [I] leads to Eq. 7.51, which upon substitution into Eq. 7.49 gives Eq. 7.52. Eq. 7.52 has several rate constants incorporated into a product and quotient, which taken together is a constant that we call fcobs- This mechanistic scenario predicts that the reaction is first order in A and B, distinctly different than that presented in the last mechanistic scenario. This comparison reveals the power of a kinetic analysis when deciphering complex reaction mechanisms, because we are able to predict the order of the reaction with respect to different reactants for different possible mechanisms. However, this analysis also shows that we could not distinguish the mechanism of Eq. 7.48 from a simple elementary second order reaction of A and B, because both rate laws have a single rate constant, k or We cannot decipher whether a rate constant represents a single elementary step or a combination of several rate constants for individual elementary steps. 

A significantly more important tool to decipher the reaction mechanism is probe reactions (Fig. 8). Most commonly used are cyclopropylcarbinyl radical ring opening reactions and radical 5-exo cyclizations to intercept coupling reactions with metal centers. Cyclopropylmethyl bromide 20 is reduced by a metal complex and generates cyclopropylcarbinyl radical 20A. Unimolecular ring opening to... 

---