Comparison to design and spacing

Consequence screening (Section 3.3) —By comparison to design and spacing criteria Information used in initial screening Applicable industry or company I standards j Building construction type Distances between process units and buildings... [Pg.17]

Consequence Screening by Comparison to Design and Spacing Criteria... [Pg.21]

Perform consequence screening by comparison to design and spacing criteria. [Pg.90]

The results of the consequence screening by comparison to design and spacing standards were not as conclusive for the other two process areas. Therefore, it was decided to conduct a more detailed consequence screening. [Pg.118]

Table 3.4 shows a composite example of one type of standard that can be used to perform an explosion consequence screening by comparison to pre-established design and spacing criteria. [Pg.21]

The simplest form of pattern comparison (euclidean distance in 16-diraensional space) was used to design and build an operational portable gas monitoring unit (15). With the limited computer power of a portable instrument, any one of about a dozen gases could be identified In less than one minute of computational time. This algorithm was evaluated using a data set for repeated runs of 16 different chemicals in 2 different sensor arrays (14). The results... [Pg.305]

Big Chemical Encyclopedia