Chromatography procedures, survey

Even though the number of pesticides surveyed amounted to more than 100, only 46 were actually detected (Table V). From records that were kept as well as unidentified GLC peaks, other pesticides were deposited Into the beds but either were not detected by the gas chromatography procedure, were present In undetectable levels or were unknown or unregistered compounds. Tables VI to XI show the average accumulated pesticide concentrations from each of the six field stations having the heaviest use of the evaporation beds. 

In bioanalysis, High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is the analytical technique most frequently used. Often, extended sample preparation is required to make a biological sample (the matrix) suitable for HPLC-analysis. The compound of interest, the analyte, has to be isolated from the matrix as selective and quantitative as possible. The quality of the sample preparation largely determines the quality of the total analysis procedure. In a survey Majors [2] showed that approximately 30% of an error generated during sample analysis was due to sample preparation, which indicates the need for error reduction and quality improvement in sample preparation. 

The following table provides a summary of the general characteristics of the most popular stationary phases used in modem high-performance liquid chromatography.1 7 The most commonly used phases are the bonded reverse phase materials, in which separation control is a function of the mobile (liquid) phase. The selection of a particular phase and solvent system is an empirical procedure involving survey analyses. The references provided below will assist the reader in this procedure. 

Various other p-alkylphenols have been studied in one-pot procedures. However, the yields of calixarenes are generally lower than with 1, and individual compounds often can be isolated only by chromatography. Table 1 gives a survey. As a rule of thumb it may be concluded that calixarene formation is favoured for those alkylphenols, where a tertiary carbon is attached to the p-position. Calixarenes p-substituted by electron-withdrawing residues have not been obtained by one-pot syntheses starting with the single phenol, while p-benzyloxy- and p-phenylphenol were used with some success. 

A comprehensive overview of preconcentration techniques for uranium (VI) and thorium (IV) prior to analysis was published (Prasada Rao et al. 2006). The multitude of off-line techniques that were reviewed includes liquid-liquid extraction, liquid membranes, ion exchange, extraction chromatography, flotation, absorptive electrochemical accumulation, solid-phase extraction (SPE), and ion imprinting polymers. In addition, online preconcentration methods for uranium, thorium, and mixtures of the two are also briefly surveyed. This overview includes over 100 references and is a good source for finding a suitable preconcentration technique with regard to the enrichment factor, retention and sorption capacity, method validation, and types of real samples. The review article focused on samples in which the uranium was already in solution so that digestion procedures for solid samples were not discussed (Prasada Rao et al. 2006). 

R. Murray One aspect that you did not mention is who does the analysis The usefulness of an electrochemical procedure depends on where it is done. If it is done by experts, that is one thing. If it is done by low skill people in a routine laboratory, that is something altogether different. I think that electrochemistry often suffers from the complexity of its application in a routine situation when compared to spectroscopy and chromatography. I wonder if you would comment on where you feel that electrochemistry can be applied using the lowest skill level of the routine workers. I believe these problems are different from those of the overall survey. 

---