Diastereoselectivity chiral alkenes

By photolysis of achiral heteroatom-stabilized chromium carbene complexes chromium-ketene species are generated that undergo [2+2] cycloaddition with chiral alkenes diastereoselectively. ... 

The chiral sites which are able to rationalize the isospecific polymerization of 1-alkenes are also able, in the framework of the mechanism of the chiral orientation of the growing polymer chain, to account for the stereoselective behavior observed for chiral alkenes in the presence of isospecific heterogeneous catalysts.104 In particular, the model proved able to explain the experimental results relative to the first insertion of a chiral alkene into an initial Ti-methyl bond,105 that is, the absence of discrimination between si and re monomer enantiofaces and the presence of diastereoselectivity [preference for S(R) enantiomer upon si (re) insertion]. Upon si (re) coordination of the two enantiomers of 3-methyl-l-pentene to the octahedral model site, it was calculated that low-energy minima only occur when the conformation relative to the single C-C bond adjacent to the double bond, referred to the hydrogen atom bonded to the tertiary carbon atom, is nearly anticlinal minus, A- (anticlinal plus, A+). Thus one can postulate the reactivity only of the A- conformations upon si coordination and of the A+ conformations upon re coordination (Figure 1.16). In other words, upon si coordination, only the synperiplanar methyl conformation would be accessible to the S enantiomer and only the (less populated) synperiplanar ethyl conformation to the R enantiomer this would favor the si attack of the S enantiomer with respect to the same attack of the R enantiomer, independent of the chirality of the catalytic site. This result is in agreement with a previous hypothesis of Zambelli and co-workers based only on the experimental reactivity ratios of the different faces of C-3-branched 1-alkenes.105... 

The diastereoselectivity in the ene reaction of O2 with chiral alkenes bearing a stereogenic centre at the a-position with respect to the double bond has been extensively studied. Chiral alkenes which bear a substituent on the asymmetric carbon atom other than the hydroxy or amine functionality afford predominately erythro allylic hydroperoxides. The erythro selectivity was attributed to steric and electronic repulsions between... 

It has already been mentioned (Section III) that the study of the diastereoselection in the electrophilic addition of singlet oxygen to the n face of chiral alkenes is of primary interest for the achievement of a selective oxyfunctionalization reaction. Zeolite confinement and cation- 7r interactions might be expected to affect significantly the diastereoselectivity in the photooxygenation of chiral alkenes. 

TABLE 24. Regioselectivity and diastereoselectivity in the photooxygenation of chiral alkenes within zeoUte Na-Y and in solution (values in parentheses)... 

For the photooxygenation of chiral alkenes in solution bearing a stereogenic centre at the or more remote position with respect to the double bond, low or negligible diastereoselection is expected. The photooxygenation of 2-methyl-5-phenyl-2-hexene 156, a chiral alkene that bears a stereogenic centre at the /3-position with respect to the double bond, gave in solution low diastereoselectivity ca 10% By Na-Y... 

As already mentioned, the dioxirane epoxidation of an alkene is a stereoselective process, which proceeds with complete retention of the original substrate configuration. The dioxirane epoxidation of chiral alkenes leads to diastereomeric epoxides, for which the diastereoselectivity depends on the alkene and on the dioxirane structure. A comparative study on the diastereoselectivity for the electrophihc epoxidants DMD versus mCPBA has revealed that DMD exhibits consistently a higher diastereoselectivity than mCPBA however, the difference is usually small. An exception is 3-hydroxycyclohexene, which displays a high cis selectivity for mCPBA, but is unselective for DMD . ... 

The results of the dioxirane epoxidation of some 3-alkyl-substituted cyclohexenes and of 2-menthene indicate that the diastereoselectivity control is subject to the steric interactions of the dioxirane with the substituents of the substrate, while the size of the dioxirane substituents has only a minimal effect . In the favored transition structure, the alkyl groups of the dioxirane cannot interact effectively with the substituents at the stereogenic center of the chiral alkene . ... 

Extensive studies on diastereoselectivity in the reactions of 1,3-dipoles such as nitrile oxides and nitrones have been carried out over the last 10 years. In contrast, very little work was done on the reactions of nitrile imines with chiral alkenes until the end of the 1990s and very few enantiomerically pure nitrile imines were generated. The greatest degree of selectivity so far has been achieved in cycloadditions to the Fischer chromium carbene complexes (201) to give, initially, the pyrazohne complexes 202 and 203 (111,112). These products proved to be rather unstable and were oxidized in situ with pyridine N-oxide to give predominantly the (4R,5S) product 204 in moderate yield (35-73%). 

The stereochemical result is no longer characterized solely by the fact that the newly formed stereocenters have a uniform configuration relative to each other. This was the only type of stereocontrol possible in the reference reaction 9-BBN + 1-methylcyclohexene (Figure 3.25). In the hydroborations of the cited chiral alkenes with 9-BBN, an additional question arises. What is the relationship between the new stereocenters and the stereocenter(s) already present in the alkene When a uniform relationship between the old and the new stereocenters arises, a type of diastereoselectivity not mentioned previously is present. It is called induced or relative diastereoselectivity. It is based on the fact that the substituents on the stereocenter(s) of the chiral alkene hinder one face of the chiral alkene more than the other. This is an example of what is called substrate control of stereoselectivity. Accordingly, in the hydroborations/oxidations of Figures 3.26 and 3.27, 9-BBN does not add to the top and the bottom sides of the alkenes with the same reaction rate. The transition states of the two modes of addition are not equivalent with respect to energy. The reason for this inequality is that the associated transition states are diastereotopic. They thus have different energies—just diastereomers. 

If, as in the reaction example in Figure 3.32, during the addition to enantiomerically pure chiral alkenes, substrate and reagent control of diastereoselectivity act in opposite directions, we have a so-called mismatched pair. For obvious reasons it reacts with relatively little diastereoselectivity and also relatively slowly. Side reactions and, as a consequence, reduced yields are not unusual in this type of reaction. However, there are cases in which mismatched paris still give rise to highly diastereoselective reactions, just not as high as the matched pair. 

Conversely, the addition of enantiomerically pure chiral dialkylboranes to enantiomerically pure chiral alkenes can also take place in such a way that substrate control and reagent control of diastereoselectivity act in the same direction. Then we have a matched pair. It reacts faster than the corresponding mismatched pair and with especially high diastereoselectivity. This approach to stereoselective synthesis is also referred to as double stereodifferentiation. 

The combination of nitrene and substrate chirality improves the diastereoselectivity of the cycloaddition reaction. For example, due to the use of both chiral aroyl azides and chiral alkenes, the pure exo-product (compound 108) was obtained (Sch. 32) [43]. 

A few recent studies have described the AA of substrates containing chiral [40, 70, 72, 94, 97, 98] or prochiral [99-102] centers. In the AA of chiral substrates, double diastereoselectivity arose from the interaction of the substrate with the chiral ligand. The AA proceeded with the sense of facial selectivity expected for the DHQD or DHQ ligands. The effect of the chiral center on the facial selectivity has not been investigated. A study of the AA of the chiral alkene 79 with the pseudoenantiomeric forms of the PHAL ligands revealed that the DHQ and the DHQD ligands led to matched (70% de) and mismatched (29% de) reactions, respectively (Scheme 18) [97]. 

Diastereoselective and enantioselective (see Enantio-selectivity) cyclopropanations of chiral alkenes can be achieved (Scheme 57). Unactivated alkenes usually do not participate in cyclopropanation reactions of Fischer carbenes. However, alkenyl- and heteroaryl-substituted group 6 alkoxy carbene complexes cyclopropanate unactivated alkenes in good yield (Scheme 58). ... 

From the synthetic point of view, satisfactory cis dihydroxylations with these reagents are best achieved with electron-poor alkenes such as oc,/ -unsaturated esters and lactones. Permanganate ion mediated dihydroxylations of chiral alkenes usually afford the same sense of diastereoselection as the osmylation reaction, a result suggesting comparable steric and electronic requirements in the corresponding transition states. 

Examples of the hydroamination of chiral alkenes in which substrate-induced diastereoselectivity would be expected to be observed are lacking in the literature. 

A variety of precursors of biologically relevant products have also been prepared by addition of nitrile oxides to chiral alkenes bearing a nitrogen substituted allylic stereocen-ter 37, i4°. rai. i46, iso. isi.155 obeyed diastereoselection is generally rather low and... 

Better diastereoselectivities were achieved with dipolarophiles such as unsaturated esters that bear a chiral auxiliary297-298. For instance, cycloaddition of the EVE-azomethine ylide, generated from the following imine by metalation, with the chiral alkene (27 )-2-(2-methoxycar-bonylethenyl)-3-phenyl-l,3-diazabicyclo[3.3.0]octane affords the pyrrolidine derivative as a single regio- and stereoisomer297. 

For acyclic chiral alkenes the diastereofacial discrimination is often low due to their high conformational mobility. However, in certain allylsilane derivatives the diastereoselectivity of the methylenation is high for (Z)-olefins (Table 3), but is considerably lower for the corresponding ( )-olefins38,93. This effect can be explained by the allylic 1,3-strain model39. 

---