Chemical reaction stochastic interactions

The authors applied this model to the situation of dissolving and deposited interfaces, involving chemically interacting species, and included rate kinetics to model mass transfer as a result of chemical reactions [60]. The use of a stochastic weighting function, based on solutions of differential equations for particle motion, may be a useful method to model stochastic processes at solid-liquid interfaces, especially where chemical interactions between the surface and the liquid are involved. 

It has been suggested that weak interactions could be responsible for driving racemates towards homochirality via a deterministic process. However, it is difficult to deduce conclusions regarding the role played by these forces in chemical reactions for ensembles of molecules, since they induce a chiral bias of only 106 molecules per mole six orders of magnitude lower than the stochastic fluctuations present in a racemate. 

In Section III the encounter theory was applied to test particle-bath particle interactions to yield, with additional assumptions, the test particle transport projjerties. In Section IV the theory is applied to pair dissociation dynamics. This is just the inverse process to particle encounter and reaction, and the two are related by the equilibrium constant. This illustrates an advantage of the stochastic encounter theory of Section II. The use of the potential with a transition state (as shown in Fig. 1) partitions conhgura-tion space uniquely into bound pairs and free pairs such that the equilibrium constant is trivially evaluated. This overcomes many of the problems associated with diffusion-based theories in which dubious boundary conditions must be used to mimic chemical reaction and the possibility of redissociation. 

The time evolution of fhe densify mafrix g of the system under the joint influence of the spin Hamiltonian H comprising also the exchange interaction, of diffusion (operator F), of the chemical reaction (operator K), and of relaxation (operator R) is given by the so-called stochastic Liouville equation, ... 

Reaction kinetic models can be simulated not only by solving the kinetic system of differential equations but also via simulating the equivalent stochastic models. Computer codes are available that solve the stochastic kinetic equations. One of these is the Chemical Kinetics Simulator (CKS) program that was developed at IBM s Almaden Research Centre. It provides a rapid, interactive method for the accurate simulation of chemical reactions. CKS is a good tool for teaching the principles of stochastic reaction kinetics to students and trainees. 

In the framework of this ultimate model [33] there are m2 constants of the rate of the chain propagation kap describing the addition of monomer to the radical Ra whose reactivity is controlled solely by the type a of its terminal unit. Elementary reactions of chain termination due to chemical interaction of radicals Ra and R is characterized by m2 kinetic parameters k f . The stochastic process describing macromolecules, formed at any moment in time t, is a Markov chain with transition matrix whose elements are expressed through the concentrations Ra and Ma of radicals and monomers at this particular moment in the following way [1,34] ... 

The brief review of the newest results in the theory of elementary chemical processes in the condensed phase given in this chapter shows that great progress has been achieved in this field during recent years, concerning the description of both the interaction of electrons with the polar medium and with the intramolecular vibrations and the interaction of the intramolecular vibrations and other reactive modes with each other and with the dissipative subsystem (thermal bath). The rapid development of the theory of the adiabatic reactions of the transfer of heavy particles with due account of the fluctuational character of the motion of the medium in the framework of both dynamic and stochastic approaches should be mentioned. The stochastic approach is described only briefly in this chapter. The number of papers in this field is so great that their detailed review would require a separate article. 

Note that a classification of the surface reaction mechanisms can be done either on the base of the nature of limiting stages, or on the base of dynamical models of elementary acts. The first way of classification is conditional, depending strongly on the relative values of different terms in the equations of chemical kinetics (6.1.19) or (6.3.1). Classification on the base of dynamical models (non-adiabatic, adiabatic, collineai-, impact, stochastic, etc.) needs the detailed study of the physical nature of reactive interactions. Such study is at the very beginning now both in theoretical and experimental (molecular beams) directions, and it should lead to detailed information on mechanisms of surface reactions. 

Stochastic approaches to reaction kinetics assume that due to inherent stochasticity of chemical interactions, the number of molecifles at a given fixed time varies from sample to sample in the case of a hypothetical setup consisting of a large number of independent samples of the same reaction. T o account for such variations, probabflity of samples or for enzymatic kinetics, the probabiHty of the molecule numbers of all involved species at time t in a closed compartment should be considered. The lack of exact solutions has limited the exploitation of this probabilistic approach to the problems of chemical kinetics in general and enzymatic in particular. 

---