Chemical bonding hierarchy

The conjugated-circuits model is one of the simplest quantitative models that has been reasonably well studied. As already mentioned this model may be motivated from classical chemical bonding theory (extended a la Clar s classical empiricist argument) or from Simpson s existential quantum-theoretic argument [ 121 ], or from a quantum chemical derivation indicated in our hierarchy of section 3.2. But beyond derivation of the model there is the question of its solution, such as we now seek to address. 

The place of the chemical bond in this hierarchy of concepts must now be examined. It is a characteristic of a molecule which we abstract for further consideration. Where the molecule is well defined, its constituent bonds stand one remove further from experiment. We cannot study an isolated chemical bond. Whereas we can alter continuously the environment of a molecule in the gas phase simply by varying the temperature and pressure, and can extrapolate measurements so that they refer to isolated molecules, we can only change the environment of a bond discontinuously by studying it in different molecules. Where the molecule is not well defined, the bond may be more directly related to observation than is the molecule. This is so for some solid high polymers, where... 

Clearly, the second of these is of little value unless the first is satisfied within some well-defined and well-understood hierarchy of approximation we do not wish to have explanations of the strength of a chemical bond using theories which are not capable of giving a good quantitative calculation of bond energies, for example. 

In the organic soHds, a hierarchy of forces can be observed there are both strong covalent intramolecular chemical bonds and weak intermolecular van der Waals bonds. Many of the characteristic properties of the organic solids are due to the interplay of these two forces with their differing strengths. 

Moreover, the benchmark ordering hierarchy was chosen as produced by Hiickel theory (since being an approximate approach for quantum chemical modeling of chemical bonding is let to be exposed in the Volume III of this work (Putz, 2016a), dedicated to quantum molecule and chemical reactivity) and approximation since closely related with pi-electrons delocalized at the ring level as the main source of the experimentally recorded aromaticity of organic compoimds imder study (Putz et al., 2010). 

Rule 2 Each level of hierarchy is defined by the constituting (non-homeo-morphic) types of entities, and by relations between the types. In materials the relations include (but are not limited to) connectedness by primary chemical bonds, hydrogen bridges, dispersion interactions, and interactions between phases such as adhesion forces. 

The other example concerns Rule 2. Apparently, some researchers working on LC materials believed for a long time that LC phase formation is always based on primary chemical bonds - while that Rule involves a more general concept of relations. Bazuin and her collaborators (24 - 26) as well as some others have created LC phases on the basis of hydrogen bonds or ionic interactions. This is why the wording we use in the formulation of the hierarchy rules has to be quite precise. 

Figure 1. Hierarchial diagram of the BAC-MP4 method for determining thermochemical properties of molecules. First, a Hartree-Fock calculation provides the molecular geometries and frequencies. Fourth-order M0ller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP4) provides the ab initio electronic energy to which bond-additivity corrections (BAC) are then added to obtain chemical bond energies. Finally, statistical mechanics calculations are used to determine the enthalpy, entropy, and free energy of the molecule.

Regioselective control of the template polymerization is obtained by transfer of genetic (i.e., CADP or CMDPs) information through the hierarchy of chemical bond connectivity involved in the dendrimer construction. This includes the following [initiator core] DNA mimic)—[transcription] [interior branch... 

All biological systems obey the substance stability principle, whose sense is that any stmctural unit of five matter (an atom, a molecule,..., a cell,..., a population...) is potentially thermodynamically limited in its interaction with doth the stmctures of its own hierarchy and the stmctures of adjacent hierarchies. One of this principle s consequences is the inverse relationship between the stability of chemical bonds in molecules and the stability of the corresponding intermolecular bonds (characteristic of supramolecular stmctures). 

The second hierarchy results along the endpoints path Ic-IIb-III, see Figure 3.16. This tells us that, by some subsidiary, slower action, the stereo-specificity selection is the first stage of the chemical-biological interaction analyzed, followed by membrane transport and only then by the stabilization of chemical bonds through polarizability. 

---