Charging optimized methods

For molecular systems in the vacuum, exact analytical derivatives of the total energy with respect to the nuclear coordinates are available [22] and lead to very efficient local optimization methods [23], The situation is more involved for solvated systems modelled within the implicit solvent framework. The total energy indeed contains reaction field contributions of the form ER(p,p ), which are not calculated analytically, but are replaced by numerical approximations Efp(p,p ), as described in Section 1.2.5. We assume from now on that both the interface Y and the charge distributions p and p depend on n real parameters (A, , A ). In the geometry optimization problem, the A, are the cartesian coordinates of the nuclei. There are several nonequivalent ways to construct approximations of the derivatives of the reaction field energy with respect to the parameters (A1 , A ) ... 

Development of optimization methods for MEIS with variable flows of a substance participating in chemical reactions and transfer processes of heat, mass, and electric charges. 

The numerical optimization methods do not require additional assumptions of the temporal constancy, or even neglect some physical constants, for example surface potential. Used for the optimization of the edl parameters (surface hydroxyl group reaction constants, capacity and density of adsorption sites) the numerical methods allow us to find the closest values to the experimentally available data (surface charge density, adsorption of ions, zeta potential, colorimetric measurements). Usually one aims to find the parameters, accepted from physical point of view, where a function, that expresses square of the deviation between calculated and measured values will be the smallest. 

The concentration of any of these species depends on the total concentration of dissolved aluminum and on the pH, and this makes the system complex from the mathematical point of view and consequently, difficult to solve. To simplify the calculations, mass balances were applied only to a unique aluminum species (the total dissolved aluminum, TDA, instead of the several species considered) and to hydroxyl and protons. For each time step (of the differential equations-solving method), the different aluminum species and the resulting proton and hydroxyl concentration in each zone were recalculated using a pseudoequilibrium approach. To do this, the equilibrium equations (4.64)-(4.71), and the charge (4.72), the aluminum (4.73), and inorganic carbon (IC) balances (4.74) were considered in each zone (anodic, cathodic, and chemical), and a nonlinear iterative procedure (based on an optimization method) was applied to satisfy simultaneously all the equilibrium constants. In these equations (4.64)-(4.74), subindex z stands for the three zones in which the electrochemical reactor is divided (anodic, cathodic, and chemical). 

A number of types of calculations can be performed. These include optimization of geometry, transition structure optimization, frequency calculation, and IRC calculation. It is also possible to compute electronic excited states using the TDDFT method. Solvation effects can be included using the COSMO method. Electric fields and point charges may be included in the calculation. Relativistic density functional calculations can be run using the ZORA method or the Pauli Hamiltonian. The program authors recommend using the ZORA method. 

---