Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Chain-length-dependent

As with the rate of polymerization, we see from Eq. (6.37) that the kinetic chain length depends on the monomer and initiator concentrations and on the constants for the three different kinds of kinetic processes that constitute the mechanism. When the initial monomer and initiator concentrations are used, Eq. (6.37) describes the initial polymer formed. The initial degree of polymerization is a measurable quantity, so Eq. (6.37) provides a second functional relationship, different from Eq. (6.26), between experimentally available quantities-n, [M], and [1]-and theoretically important parameters—kp, k, and k. Note that the mode of termination which establishes the connection between u and hj, and the value of f are both accessible through end group characterization. Thus we have a second equation with three unknowns one more and the evaluation of the individual kinetic constants from experimental results will be feasible. [Pg.370]

The energy barrier between the two chemisorption modes on Au(lll) is very small, 10.5 kj/mol, (2.5 kcal/mol), (211), suggesting that the thiolate may easily cross from one of these minima to the other, enabling a facile annealing mechanism. This predicts that changing tilt direction may occur well below the melting point of the monolayer, and should be chain-length-dependent. [Pg.542]

Hamiltonian does not give rise to any crystalline order in the system. By employing models hke this, the quench-rate and chain-length dependence of the glass transition temperature, as well as time-temperature superposition, similar to experiments [23], were investigated in detail. [Pg.502]

The advantage of the simulations compared to the experiments is that the correspondence between the tracer diffusion coefficient and the internal states of the chains can be investigated without additional assumptions. In order to perform a more complete analysis of the data one has to look at the quench-rate and chain-length dependence of the glass transition temperature for a given density [43]. A detailed discussion of these effects is far beyond the scope of this review. Here we just want to discuss a characteristic quantity which one can analyze in this context. [Pg.502]

In Fig. 20 we show the MSQ of a system of GM [66] with different mean chain lengths (depending on 7, cf. Eq. (12)) for three values of LO=l, 0.1, 0. 01. Since the individual chains have only transient identity, it is meaningless to discuss their center of mass diffusion. It is evident from Fig. 20 that the MSQ of the segments, g t) = ([x( ) - x(O)j ), follows an intermediate sub-diffusive regime, g(t) oc which is later replaced by conventional diffusion at some characteristic crossover time which grows... [Pg.545]

Chain Length Dependence of Propagation Rate Constants... [Pg.220]

Most in depth studies of termination deal only with the low conversion regime. Logic dictates that simple center of mass diffusion and overall chain movement by reptation or many other mechanisms will be chain length dependent. At any instant, the overall rate coefficient for termination can be expressed as a weighted average of individual chain length dependent rate coefficients (eq. 20) 39... [Pg.244]

While many data are suggestive of chain length dependence, the data are not usually suitable for or have not been tested with respect to model discrimination. Values of ,u have been determined for a variety of small monomeric radicals to be ca I09 M s 1.4 Taking kt0 as Jk,lj and a as 1.0 in the geometric expression yields values of ,iJ as shown in Figure 5.4a.49 Use of the Smoluchowski mean or the harmonic mean approximation prediets a shallower dependence of k 1 on the chain length (Figure 5.4b). All expressions yield the same dependence for j=i. [Pg.246]

Figure 5.4 Chain length dependence of A,I J predicted by (a) the geometric mean (eq, 25) or (b) the harmonic mean approximation (eq. 22) or the Smoluchowski mean (eq. 23) with a=1.0 and to=109 i and j are the lengths of the reacting chains. Figure 5.4 Chain length dependence of A,I J predicted by (a) the geometric mean (eq, 25) or (b) the harmonic mean approximation (eq. 22) or the Smoluchowski mean (eq. 23) with a=1.0 and to=109 i and j are the lengths of the reacting chains.
Table 5.1 Parameters Characterizing Chain Length Dependence of Termination Rate Coefficients in Radical Polymerization of Common Monomers 1... Table 5.1 Parameters Characterizing Chain Length Dependence of Termination Rate Coefficients in Radical Polymerization of Common Monomers 1...
Bamford43,59 63 has proposed a general treatment for solving polymerization kinetics with chain length dependent kt and considered in some detail the ramifications with respect to molecular weight distributions and the kinetics of chain transfer, retardation, etc. [Pg.248]

Treatments (Smith-Ewart,79 pseudo-bulk77) have been devised which allow for the possibility of greater than one radical per particle and for the effects of chain length dependent termination. Further discussion on these is provided in the references mentioned above.77 751... [Pg.250]

This equation (eq. 5) is commonly known as the Mayo equation.1" The equation is applicable at low (zero) conversion and is invalidated if the rate constants are chain length dependent. [Pg.281]

Table 6.1 Chain Length Dependence of Transfer Constants (C )... Table 6.1 Chain Length Dependence of Transfer Constants (C )...
Some of the issues associated with RAFT emulsion polymerization have been attributed to an effect of chain length-dependent termination.528 In conventional emulsion polymerization, most termination is between a long radical and a short radical. For RAFT polymerization at low conversion most chains are short thus the rate of termination is enhanced. Conversely, at high conversion most chains are long and the rate of termination is reduced. [Pg.521]


See other pages where Chain-length-dependent is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.559]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.427]    [Pg.598]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.600]    [Pg.601]    [Pg.602]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.609]    [Pg.619]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.627]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.629]    [Pg.633]   


SEARCH



Atom transfer radical polymerization chain length dependence

Carboxyl groups Chain length, dependence

Chain Length Dependence of Propagation Rate Constants

Chain Length Dependence of the third-order Polarizabilities in Thiophene Oligomers

Chain dependence

Chain length dependence

Chain length dependence common monomers

Chain length dependence polymerization

Chain length dependence techniques

Chain length dependent determination

Chain length dependent determination radical polymerization kinetics

Chain-length-dependent perturbation

Chain-length-dependent termination, polydispersity

Dependence of N-I transition on polymer chain length

Effect of Chain-Length-Dependent Bimolecular Termination

Free radical polymerization chain length dependent termination

Function chain length dependence

Independent Chain-Length Dependent Kinetic Analysis

Kinetics chain-length-dependent

Poly chain-length dependence

Polymerization kinetics free radical, chain length dependent

Propagation chain length dependence

Propagation, chain-length dependent

Radical polymerization chain length dependence

Radical polymerization chain length-dependent changes

Self chain-length dependence

Singlet chain length dependence

Temperature Dependence of Rate and Chain Length

Temperature dependence controlled chain lengths

Termination, chain length dependent

Termination, chain length dependent radical polymerization kinetics

© 2024 chempedia.info