Central nervous system with sedative-hypnotics

Buspirone is as effective as the benzodiazepines in the treatment of general anxiety. However, the full anxiolytic effect of buspirone takes several weeks to develop, whereas the anxiolytic effect of the benzodiazepines is maximal after a few days of therapy. In therapeutic doses, buspirone has little or no sedative effect and lacks the muscle relaxant and anticonvulsant properties of the benzodiazepines. In addition, buspirone does not potentiate the central nervous system depression caused by sedative-hypnotic drugs or by alcohol, and it does not prevent the symptoms associated with benzodiazepine withdrawal. 

A significant advantage of the benzodiazepines over other central nervous system depressants (e.g., the barbiturates) is that they possess a much greater separation between the dose that produces sleep and the dose that produces death. This increased margin of safety has been one of the major reasons benzodiazepines have largely replaced the barbiturates and other types of sedative-hypnotics in the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. In addition, benzodiazepine aclministration is associated with few side effects. 

When used with other sedative-hypnotics or alcohol, the benzodiazepines will produce additive central nervous system depression. 

During the early twentieth century the barbiturates were used in children and adolescents for their sedative and hypnotic effects however, their safety profile and propensity to cause physical dependence led scientists in search of safer anxiolytics. The development of animal models of behavioral disorders facilitated the formulation of drugs with more specific central nervous system (CNS) effects. In 1959, chlordiazepoxide (Librium) was the first benzodiazepine (BZ) to receive a patent. It entered the market in 1960, followed by diazepam (Valium) in 1963. Today, over 35 BZs have been formulated and over 10 are available in the United States (Ballenger, 1995 Hobbs et ah, 1996). 

In very old patients and in patients with severe liver disease, the elimination half-lives of these drugs are often increased significantly. In such cases, multiple normal doses of these sedative-hypnotics can result in excessive central nervous system effects. 

Tolerance—decreased responsiveness to a drug following repeated exposure—is a common feature of sedative-hypnotic use. It may result in the need for an increase in the dose required to maintain symptomatic improvement or to promote sleep. It is important to recognize that partial cross-tolerance occurs between the sedative-hypnotics described here and also with ethanol (see Chapter 23)—a feature of some clinical importance, as explained below. The mechanisms responsible for tolerance to sedative-hypnotics are not well understood. An increase in the rate of drug metabolism (metabolic tolerance) may be partly responsible in the case of chronic administration of barbiturates, but changes in responsiveness of the central nervous system (pharmacodynamic tolerance) are of greater importance for most sedative-hypnotics. In the case of benzodiazepines, the development of tolerance in animals has been associated with down-regulation of brain benzodiazepine receptors. Tolerance has been reported to occur with the extended use of zolpidem. Minimal tolerance was observed with the use of zaleplon over a 5-week period and eszopiclone over a 6-month period. 

Zaleplon has a pharmacological profile similar to benzodiazepines. Zaleplon is a full agonist for the benzodiazepine oq receptor located on the GABAa receptor ionophore complex in the brain, with lower affinity for the a2 and a3 subtypes. It selectively enhances the action of GABA similar to but more selectively than benzodiazepines. Zaleplon, although not benzodiazepine-like in chemical structure, induces sedative-hypnotic, anticonvulsant, and anticonflict effects via its binding to the central nervous system (CNS)-type benzodiazepine receptors [33-36]. 

Buspirone causes less psychomotor impairment than diazepam and does not affect driving skills. The drug does not potentiate the central nervous system depressant effects of conventional sedative-hypnotic drugs, ethanol, or tricyclic antidepressants, and elderly patients do not appear to be more sensitive to its actions. Tachycardia, palpitations, nervousness, gastrointestinal distress, and paresthesias may occur more frequently than with benzodiazepines. Buspirone also causes a dose-dependent pupillary constriction. Blood pressure may be elevated in patients receiving MAO inhibitors. A number of buspirone analogs have been developed (eg, ipsapirone, gepirone, tandospirone) and are under study. 

The extensive clinical use of triazolam has led to reports of serious central nervous system effects including behavioral disinhibition, delirium, aggression, and violence. While behavioral disinhibition may occur with sedative-hypnotic drugs, it does not appear to be more prevalent with triazolam than with other benzodiazepines. Disinhibitory reactions during benzodiazepine treatment are more clearly associated with the use of very high doses and the pretreatment level of patient hostility. 

Pharmacodynamic alcohol interactions are also of great clinical significance. Additive central nervous system depression with other sedative-hypnotics is most important. Alcohol also potentiates the pharmacologic effects of many nonsedative drugs, including vasodilators and oral hypoglycemic agents. There is some evidence that alcohol also enhances the antiplatelet action of aspirin. 

Alcohol is a central nervous system depressant that shares many pharmacologic properties with the nonbenzodiazepine sedative hypnotics. 

---