Central composite designs separation conditions

Li et al. (2007) reported the use of dry biomass, Rhizopus oryzae (R. oryzae) IF04697, whole cell-catalyzed methanolysis of soybean oil for biodiesel (methyl ester) in rm-butanol system. Changing one separate factor at a time (COST), live-level-four-factor Central Composite Design (CCD) were used to evaluate the effects of synthesis conditions, such as tert-butanol to oil volume ratio, methanol to oil molar ratio, water content, and dry biomass amount. Biodiesel yields of 72% were obtained under the optimal conditions using the proposed model for prediction. 

The central composite design was often selected because of the limited number of experiments needed to sample the response surfaces. In the separation of As and Se species in tap water, the analysis of isoresponse curves allowed the determination of optimum chromatographic conditions and the robustness of the method [77]. The same design was also used to study the influence of an organic modifier and IPR concentration on retention of biogenic amines in wines. To obtain a compromise between resolution and chromatographic time, optimization through a multi-criteria approach was followed [78]. 

---