Captodative effect definitions

One point of debate in defining the magnitude of the captodative effect has been the separation of substituent effects on the radical itself as compared to that on the closed shell reference system. This is, as stated before, a general problem for all definitions of radical stability based on isodesmic reactions such as Eq. 1 [7,74,76], but becomes particularly important in multiply substituted cases. This problem can be approached either through estimating the substituent effects for the closed shell parents separately [77,78], or through the use of isodesmic reactions such as Eq. 5, in which only open shell species are present ... 

If the reduction of C—C BDEs by captodative substitution is interpreted with the appropriate caution, it can be stated that a conclusive answer as to the existence of a captodative effect in free radicals cannot be derived from these studies, If, furthermore, a consequent error-propagation analysis had been carried out, the outcome might have been that the error limits do not allow a definitive conclusion. However, the results convey a feeling that— regardless of the pros and cons for the different determination procedures— a possible captodative effect will not be great. 

The concept of captodative substitution implies the simultaneous action of a captor (acceptor) and a donor substituent on a molecule. Furthermore, in the definition of Viehe et al. (1979), which was given for free radicals, both substituents are bonded to the same or to two vinylogous carbon atoms, i.e. 1,1- and 1,3-substitution, and so forth is considered. One might, however, also include 1,2-, 1,4-,. .. disubstitution, a situation which is more often referred to as push-pull substitution. Before discussing captodative substituent effects it might be helpful to analyse the terms capto and dative in more detail. 

---