Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Brownian theory

When a system is not in equilibrium, the mathematical description of fluctuations about some time-dependent ensemble average can become much more complicated than in the equilibrium case. However, starting with the pioneering work of Einstein on Brownian motion in 1905, considerable progress has been made in understanding time-dependent fluctuation phenomena in fluids. Modem treatments of this topic may be found in the texts by Keizer [21] and by van Kampen [22]. Nevertheless, the non-equilibrium theory is not yet at the same level of rigour or development as the equilibrium theory. Here we will discuss the theory of Brownian motion since it illustrates a number of important issues that appear in more general theories. [Pg.687]

Einstein A 1956 Investigations on the Theory of Brownian Movement (New York Dover). This book is based on a series of papers Einstein published from 1905 until 1908... [Pg.714]

Smoluchowski theory [29, 30] and its modifications fonu the basis of most approaches used to interpret bimolecular rate constants obtained from chemical kinetics experiments in tenus of difhision effects [31]. The Smoluchowski model is based on Brownian motion theory underlying the phenomenological difhision equation in the absence of external forces. In the standard picture, one considers a dilute fluid solution of reactants A and B with [A] [B] and asks for the time evolution of [B] in the vicinity of A, i.e. of the density distribution p(r,t) = [B](rl)/[B] 2i ] r(t))l ] Q ([B] is assumed not to change appreciably during the reaction). The initial distribution and the outer and inner boundary conditions are chosen, respectively, as... [Pg.843]

In liquid solution. Brownian motion theory provides the relation between diffiision and friction coefficient... [Pg.849]

Brinkman H C 1956 Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion theory of chemical reactions Physica 12 149-55... [Pg.865]

A. Einstein, Investigations of the Theory of the Brownian Movement, Dover, New York, 1956. [Pg.257]

During the early years of physieal ehemistry, Ostwald did not believe in the existence of atoms... and yet he was somehow ineluded in the wild army of ionists. He was resolute in his scepticism and in the 1890s he sustained an obscure theory of energetics to take the place of the atomic hypothesis. How ions could be formed in a solution containing no atoms was not altogether clear. Finally, in 1905, when Einstein had shown in rigorous detail how the Brownian motion studied by Perrin could be interpreted in terms of the collision of dust motes with moving molecules (Chapter 3, Section 3.1.1), Ostwald relented and publicly embraced the existence of atoms. [Pg.28]

Furth, R. (ed.), 1956. Albert Einstein, investigations on the theory of Brownian movement. New York Dover. [Pg.306]

Consider now the observed values of the equivalent conductivity for the various species of ions given in Table 2 [disregarding the ions (OH)-and H+, which need special consideration]. If we ask, from this point of view, why such a wide variety of values is found, this must be ascribed to the wide variety in the character of the random motion executed by different species of ions in the absence of an electric field. We shall not go into the details of Einstein s theory of the Brownian motion but the liveliness of the motion for any species of particle may be expressed by assigning a value to a certain parameter for a charged particle in an... [Pg.44]

McConnell J. Rotational Brownian Motion and Dielectric Theory. (Academic Press, New York) (1980). [Pg.283]

Figure 4. The Brownian ratchet model of lamellar protrusion (Peskin et al., 1993). According to this hypothesis, the distance between the plasma membrane (PM) and the filament end fluctuates randomly. At a point in time when the PM is most distant from the filament end, a new monomer is able to add on. Consequently, the PM is no longer able to return to its former position since the filament is now longer. The filament cannot be pushed backwards by the returning PM as it is locked into the mass of the cell cortex by actin binding proteins. In this way, the PM is permitted to diffuse only in an outward direction. The maximum force which a single filament can exert (the stalling force) is related to the thermal energy of the actin monomer by kinetic theory according to the following equation ... Figure 4. The Brownian ratchet model of lamellar protrusion (Peskin et al., 1993). According to this hypothesis, the distance between the plasma membrane (PM) and the filament end fluctuates randomly. At a point in time when the PM is most distant from the filament end, a new monomer is able to add on. Consequently, the PM is no longer able to return to its former position since the filament is now longer. The filament cannot be pushed backwards by the returning PM as it is locked into the mass of the cell cortex by actin binding proteins. In this way, the PM is permitted to diffuse only in an outward direction. The maximum force which a single filament can exert (the stalling force) is related to the thermal energy of the actin monomer by kinetic theory according to the following equation ...
Subsequent work by Johansson and Lofroth [183] compared this result with those obtained from Brownian dynamics simulation of hard-sphere diffusion in polymer networks of wormlike chains. They concluded that their theory gave excellent agreement for small particles. For larger particles, the theory predicted a faster diffusion than was observed. They have also compared the diffusion coefficients from Eq. (73) to the experimental values [182] for diffusion of poly(ethylene glycol) in k-carrageenan gels and solutions. It was found that their theory can successfully predict the diffusion of solutes in both flexible and stiff polymer systems. Equation (73) is an example of the so-called stretched exponential function discussed further later. [Pg.579]

The velocity, viscosity, density, and channel-height values are all similar to UF, but the diffusivity of large particles (MF) is orders-of-magnitude lower than the diffusivity of macromolecules (UF). It is thus quite surprising to find the fluxes of cross-flow MF processes to be similar to, and often higher than, UF fluxes. Two primary theories for the enhanced diffusion of particles in a shear field, the inertial-lift theory and the shear-induced theory, are explained by Davis [in Ho and Sirkar (eds.), op. cit., pp. 480-505], and Belfort, Davis, and Zydney [/. Membrane. Sci., 96, 1-58 (1994)]. While not clear-cut, shear-induced diffusion is quite large compared to Brownian diffusion except for those cases with very small particles or very low cross-flow velocity. The enhancement of mass transfer in turbulent-flow microfiltration, a major effect, remains completely empirical. [Pg.56]

Brownian motion theory may be generalized to treat systems with many interacting B particles. Such many-particle Langevin equations have been investigated at a molecular level by Deutch and Oppenheim [58], A simple system in which to study hydrodynamic interactions is two particles fixed in solution at a distance Rn- The Langevin equations for the momenta P, (i = 1,2)... [Pg.118]

P. Langevin, Sur la theorie du mouvement brownian, Comptes Rendus 146, 530 (1908). [Pg.141]

P. Mazur and I. Oppenheim, Molecular theory of Brownian motion, Physica 50, 241 (1970). [Pg.143]

M. Tokuyama and I. Oppenheim, Statistical-mechanical theory of Brownian motion— translational motion in an equilibrium fluid, Physica A 94, 501 (1978). [Pg.143]

P. Espanol and I. Zuniga, Force autocorrelation function in Brownian motion theory, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 574 (1993). [Pg.143]

Diffusion of small molecular penetrants in polymers often assumes Fickian characteristics at temperatures above Tg of the system. As such, classical diffusion theory is sufficient for describing the mass transport, and a mutual diffusion coefficient can be determined unambiguously by sorption and permeation methods. For a penetrant molecule of a size comparable to that of the monomeric unit of a polymer, diffusion requires cooperative movement of several monomeric units. The mobility of the polymer chains thus controls the rate of diffusion, and factors affecting the chain mobility will also influence the diffusion coefficient. The key factors here are temperature and concentration. Increasing temperature enhances the Brownian motion of the polymer segments the effect is to weaken the interaction between chains and thus increase the interchain distance. A similar effect can be expected upon the addition of a small molecular penetrant. [Pg.464]


See other pages where Brownian theory is mentioned: [Pg.692]    [Pg.708]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.714]    [Pg.721]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.2046]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.153]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.468]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.338 ]




SEARCH



Brownian motion Stokes-Einstein theory

Brownian motion general theory

Brownian motion theory

Brownian motion theory, Smoluchowski

Constrained Brownian motion phase space kinetic theory

Onsager theory Brownian motion

© 2024 chempedia.info