Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Brownian motion inertial effects

When aerosols are in a flow configuration, diffusion by Brownian motion can take place, causing deposition to surfaces, independent of inertial forces. The rate of deposition depends on the flow rate, the particle diffusivity, the gradient in particle concentration, and the geometry of the collecting obstacle. The diffusion processes are the key to the effectiveness of gas filters, as we shall see later. [Pg.64]

Particle dynamics wall effects inertial effects inhomogeneous shear fields Brownian motion. [Pg.3]

The principle of filtration combines many of the individual mechanisms of collection on which other methods are based. Thus, diffusion (Brownian motion), inertia, interception, charge, and sedimentation may all contribute to deposition of particles on filters. The inertial and interception effects are illustrated in Fig. 3. [Pg.363]

Thus the Debye equation [Eq. (1)] may be satisfactorily explained in terms of the thermal fluctuations of an assembly of dipoles embedded in a heat bath giving rise to rotational Brownian motion described by the Fokker-Planck or Langevin equations. The advantage of a formulation in terms of the Brownian motion is that the kinetic equations of that theory may be used to extend the Debye calculation to more complicated situations [8] involving the inertial effects of the molecules and interactions between the molecules. Moreover, the microscopic mechanisms underlying the Debye behavior may be clearly understood in terms of the diffusion limit of a discrete time random walk on the surface of the unit sphere. [Pg.290]

We shall now almost exclusively concentrate on the fractal time random walk excluding inertial effects and the discrete orientation model of dielectric relaxation. We shall demonstrate how in the diffusion limit this walk will yield a fractional generalization of the Debye-Frohlich model. Just as in the conventional Debye relaxation, a fractional generalization of the Debye-Frohlich model may be derived from a number of very different models of the relaxation process (compare the approach of Refs. 22, 23, 28 and 34—36). The advantage of using an approach based on a kinetic equation such as the fractional Fokker-Planck equation (FFPE) however is that such a method may easily be extended to include the effects of the inertia of the dipoles, external potentials, and so on. Moreover, the FFPE (by use of a theorem of operational calculus generalized to fractional exponents and continued fraction methods) clearly indicates how many existing results of the classical theory of the Brownian motion may be extended to include fractional dynamics. [Pg.299]

In the present section, it is demonstrated how the linear response of an assembly of noninteracting polar Brownian particles to a small external field F applied parallel and perpendicular to the bias field Fo may be calculated in the context of the fractional noninertial rotational diffusion in the same manner as normal rotational diffusion [8]. In order to carry out the calculation, it is assumed that the rotational Brownian motion of a particle may be described by a fractional noninertial Fokker-Planck (Smoluchowski) equation, in which the inertial effects are neglected. Both exact and approximate solutions of this equation are presented. We shall demonstrate that the characteristic times of the normal diffusion process, namely, the integral and effective relaxation times obtained in Refs. 8, 65, and 67, allow one to evaluate the dielectric response for anomalous diffusion. Moreover, these characteristic times yield a simple analytical equation for the complex dielectric susceptibility tensor describing the anomalous relaxation of the system. The exact solution of the problem reduces to the solution of the infinite hierarchies of differential-recurrence equations for the corresponding relaxation functions. The longitudinal and transverse components of the susceptibility tensor may be calculated exactly from the Laplace transform of these relaxation functions using linear response theory [72]. [Pg.338]

If inertial effects are included, the correlation functions pertaining to longitudinal and transverse motions will still be the product of the correlation functions of the free Brownian motion of a sphere [9] and the solid-state correlation functions (cos 19(0) cosi9(t)),p and so on however, the composite expressions will be much more complicated for an arbitrary inertial parameter a, Eq. (102). The reason is that the orientational correlation functions for the Brownian motion of a sphere may only be expressed exactly [18,19] as the inverse Laplace transform of an infinite continued fraction in the frequency... [Pg.166]

Here y = x/r[ = =C, /2/IkT is chosen as the inertial effects parameter (y = /2/y is effectively the inverse square root of the parameter y used earlier in Section I). Noting e initial condition, Eq. (134), all the < (()) in Eq. (136) will vanish with the exception of n = 0. Furthermore, Eq. (136) is an example of hoyv, using the Laplace integration theorem above, all recurrence relations associated with the Brownian motion may be generalized to fractional dynamics. The normalized complex susceptibility /(m) = x ( ) z"( ) is given by linear response theory as... [Pg.179]

A suspension is a dispersion of particles within a solvent (usually a low-molar-mass liquid). Thermodynamics (Brownian motion and collisions) favours the clumping of small particles, and this can be increased by flow. However, particles over 1 pm tend to settle under gravity, unless stability measures have been considered (matching the density of the particle to that of the medium, increasing the Brownian/gravitational force ratio, electrostatic stabilization, steric stabilization). Other complications can occur in the dynamics of suspensions, such as particle migration across streamlines, particle inertial effects and wall slip (Larson, 1999). [Pg.171]

For some problems, such as the motion of heavy particles in aqueous solvent (e.g., conformational transitions of exposed amino acid sidechains, the diffusional encounter of an enzyme-substrate pair), either inertial effects are unimportant or specific details of the dynamics are not of interest e.g., the solvent damping is so large that inertial memory is lost in a very short time. The relevant approximate equation of motion that is applicable to these cases is called the Brownian equation of motion,... [Pg.53]

In Eq. (23), is the friction coefficient that usually appears when describing Brownian motion in velocity space (Santamaria Holek, 2005 2001), and corresponds to what is referred as a direct effect in nonequilibrium thermodynamics (de Groot Mazur, 1984). The cross coefficient = pp/pyl is related to inertial effects and pp and py denote the particle and host fluid densities, and 1 is the unit tensor. The tensor e constitutes an important result of this analysis. It corresponds to a cross effect term proportional to the gradient of the imposed velocity flow Vvq. [Pg.112]


See other pages where Brownian motion inertial effects is mentioned: [Pg.364]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.176]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.1257]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.78]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.267 , Pg.268 , Pg.269 , Pg.270 , Pg.271 , Pg.272 , Pg.273 , Pg.364 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.267 , Pg.268 , Pg.269 , Pg.270 , Pg.271 , Pg.272 , Pg.273 , Pg.364 ]




SEARCH



Brownian effects

Brownian motion

Inertial

Inertial motion

Motional effects

© 2024 chempedia.info