Brief Overview and Evaluation of Available Software

The reliability of scientific work based on computer-generated 3D structures requires a careful evaluation of available 3D generators to find the program best 

Programs. CONCORD version 6.1.0 and CORINA version 3.4 were used for this study. CONCORD was run with the following ophons  

GORINA was run with the -d r2d ophon in order to remove structures without generated 3D coordinates from the output. 

Results. Table 7.1 summarizes the results of the evaluation study obtained for CONCORD and CORINA. None of the programs crashed or produced any stereo errors. CORINA had a conversion rate close to 100%, whereas CONCORD converted only 91%. However, CONCORD was faster than CORINA with an average 

2 Percentage of structures with an RM S deviation of the nonhydrogen atoms less than 0.3 A. 

---