Boundary layers first-order derivatives

The question has been considered (44) as to whether or not a cubic rate law can also be achieved by transport phenomena in p-type space charge boundary layers. These considerations were based on the assumption that the entire oxide layer constitutes a space charge boundary layer. In order to simplify the derivation of the rate law, we assume in the formation of p- and p-n type boundary layers that the electric field established in the surface layer is caused to a first approxi mation only by the distribution of holes, i. e., p >>nj ej an< p n. Under these assumptions, the derivation of the nole current leads to the following expression ... 

Equation (7.1) does not contain first-order derivatives. The boundary layer stmcture of the asymptotics may change substantially if terms with lower order derivatives (even with small factors multiplying them) are added to Eq. (7.1). As an example, consider the equation... 

It is perhaps wise to begin by questioning the conceptual simplicity of the uptake process as described by equation (35) and the assumptions given in Section 6.1.2. As discussed above, the Michaelis constant, Km, is determined by steady-state methods and represents a complex function of many rate constants [114,186,281]. For example, in the presence of a diffusion boundary layer, the apparent Michaelis-Menten constant will be too large, due to the depletion of metal near the reactive surface [9,282,283], In this case, a modified flux equation, taking into account a diffusion boundary layer and a first-order carrier-mediated uptake can be taken into account by the Best equation [9] (see Chapter 4 for a discussion of the limitations) or by other similar derivations [282] ... 

Though there is fluid flow in the bulk of the electrolyte, it is found that there is a layer adjacent to the electrode in which the electrolyte is stationary, or stagnant. Thus the electron acceptors travel by convection from the bulk up to the stagnant layer and then cross the remaining boundary layer by diffusion. This transport by a convection-with-diffusion mechanism has not been taken into account so far. The equations for the time and space variation of concentration [i.e., Eq. (7.178)], for the transition time [Eq. (7.190)], and for the time variation of potential [Eq. (7.192)] have been derived for convection-free conditions, and they break down when convection becomes significant. The first approximation theory given above, therefore, deviates from experiment if the constant current is applied sufficiently long (times on the order of seconds) for convection to be important. 

The rate of deposition of Brownian particles is predicted by taking into account the effects of diffusion and convection of single particles and interaction forces between particles and collector [2.1] -[2.6]. It is demonstrated that the interaction forces can be incorporated into a boundary condition that has the form of a first order chemical reaction which takes place on the collector [2.1], and an expression is derived for the rate constant The rate of deposition is obtained by solving the convective diffusion equation subject to that boundary condition. The procedure developed for deposition is extended to the case when both deposition and desorption occur. In the latter case, the interaction potential contains the Bom repulsion, in addition to the London and double-layer interactions [2.2]-[2.7]. Paper [2.7] differs from [2.2] because it considers the deposition at both primary and secondary minima. Papers [2.8], [2.9] and [2.10] treat the deposition of cancer cells or platelets on surfaces. 

The second chapter examines the deposition of Brownian particles on surfaces when the interaction forces between particles and collector play a role. When the range of interactions between the two (which can be called the interaction force boundary layer) is small compared to the thickness of the diffusion boundary layer of the particles, the interactions can be replaced by a boundary condition. This has the form of a first order chemical reaction, and an expression is derived for the reaction rate constant. Although cells are larger than the usual Brownian particles, the deposition of cancer cells or platelets on surfaces is treated similarly but on the basis of a Fokker-Plank equation. 

In order to illustrate how these integral equations are derived, attention will be given to two-dimensional, constant fluid property flow. First, consider conservation of momentum. It is assumed that the flow consists of a boundary layer and an outer inviscid flow and that, because the boundary layer is thin, the pressure is constant across the boundary layer. The boundary layer is assumed to have a distinct edge in the present analysis. This is shown in Fig. 2.20. 

A solution that was accurate to first order in the buoyancy parameter, Gr. for near-forced convective laminar two-dimensional boundary layer flow over an isothermal vertical plate was discussed in this chapter. Derive the equations that would allow a solution that was second order accurate in Gx to be obtained. Clearly state the boundary conditions on the solution. 

Equations (55)—(58) have been used by Brabbs et al. [92] to assist in the selection of four mixtures suitable for examination in order to determine the four primary rate coefficients. For the mixtures selected, Table 23 shows the sensitivities of the growth constants to each of the five reaction rates, calculated from the modified eqn. (53). Table 24 gives a selection of the final results. The rate coefficients themselves were obtained by means of an iterative procedure based on eqn. (53), and using initial independent estimates of 1, 3, 4 and 2 3 in order to derive the first value of 2. Boundary layer effects in the shock tube were allowed for in the initial determination of the growth constants. The apparent 2 determined without these corrections were some 20—60 % larger than the values given in Table 24, with an apparent activation energy of only 11.9 instead of 16.3 kcal. mole . ... 

The most important point to note is that the leading-order solution = 1 does not imply that the heat flux at the body surface is zero, even though this might at first appear to be the case. In general, the condition of matching between the inner and outer approximations within the thermal boundary layer requires not only (11—67c) but also that the spatial derivatives of 9 and should match at each level of approximation for Pr -> 0. Thus, in particular,... 

A corrective coefficient has been calculated by different authors [6] who have shown that a better prediction of the flow out of the Knudsen layer would be obtained with this corrective coefficient slightly different from unity, unlike as initially proposed by Maxwell. Its value depends on the collision model for example, = 1.11 for a HS model [7]. Equation 12 is called first-order slip boundary condition, because it involves the Knudsen number (9(Kn)) and the first derivative du Jdn ) . 

The dialytic regime is characterized by high surface reaction rate coefficients and by rate-limiting diffusion. The Sherwood number (Sh) characterizes the regimes. Sh is defined as the ratio of the driving force for diffusion in the boundary layer to the driving force for surface reaction alternatively, it is the ratio of the resistivity for diffusion to the resistivity for chemical reaction (reciprocal reaction rate coefficient). Diffusion limitation is the regime at Sh 1 and reaction limitation means Sh 1. The Sherwood number is closely related to the Biot, Nusselt, and Damkohler II numbers and the Thiele modulus. Some call it the CVD number. In the boundary-layer model it is a simple function of the thickness of the boundary layer, the diffusion coefficient, and the reaction rate coefficient. For simplicity a first-order reaction will be considered in the derivation below. 

Non-monotonic density profiles are unstable. Since, however, the influence of the wall decays exponentially with the distance, the dynamics is practically frozen whenever the interphase boundary is separated from the wall by a layer thick compared to the characteristic width of the diffuse interface. A static solution with a fixed h exists only at a certain fixed value of i, which can be determined using a solvability condition of the first-order equation as in Section 1.3. In a wider context, an appropriate solvability condition serves to obtain an evolution equation for the nominal position h of the interphase boundary. The technique of derivation of solvability conditions for a problem involving a semi-infinite region and exponentially decaying interactions is non-standard and therefore deserves some attention. 

The lubrication equations are derived by expanding both equations and boundary conditions in powers of e and retaining the lowest-order terms. First, we deduce from the vertical component of the Stokes equation, reduced in the leading order to dp/dz = 0, that chemical potential p(x, t) is constant across the layer. The horizontal component of the Stokes equation takes now the form... 

---