Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Normalised Bonds

For metals and ionic solids, in which atoms interact only by omni-directional primary bonds, it is clear that S will be the fracture energy of sudi bonds normalised to unit area. For co-valently bonded solids, like diamond, the secondary bonding energies are negligible with respect to the primary bond strengths so that S will be given directly by the latter - again normalised to unit area. [Pg.6]

Figure 2.6 PCA of the top 200 small molecule drugs in 2006 including natural product drugs (red) and 595 Merck natural products (blue). The descriptors MW, HBA, HBD, AlogP98, PSA, normalised bond flexibility, nitrogen count, oxygen count and chiral centre count were used. Figure 2.6 PCA of the top 200 small molecule drugs in 2006 including natural product drugs (red) and 595 Merck natural products (blue). The descriptors MW, HBA, HBD, AlogP98, PSA, normalised bond flexibility, nitrogen count, oxygen count and chiral centre count were used.
The point to notice is that a threshold level of stored energy in the bond is necessary before AG -> 0 and thus before the forward reaction can proceed. This stored energy is, of course, equal to AG and thus (when normalised) to the surface energy of the material. Thus we see that the kinetic model of fracture requires a minimum energy supply equal to the surface energy, which is the fracture criterion employed by Griffith. No contradiction therefore exists between the kinetic and Griffith theories. [Pg.9]

Figures (a) More O Ferrall-Jencks diagram the structure-reactivity surface of the displacement reaction (E - Yy + xY - lx + Values of p or f are normalised by division by or P, for each fundamental bond-forming or -fission... Figures (a) More O Ferrall-Jencks diagram the structure-reactivity surface of the displacement reaction (E - Yy + xY - lx + Values of p or f are normalised by division by or P, for each fundamental bond-forming or -fission...
The map of Bronsted p values for the cyclisation are shown in Scheme 12. The Utg for the reaction of the conjugate base is 0.55. When the reference equilibrium for the effective charge of one substituent effect is not the same as that for the other (as in Problem 12) the bonding changes can only be compared when the P or p values are normalised as Leffler indices. In the case of cyclisation to the oxazolinone it is most convenient that bond fission is measured by a Bronsted relationship and bond formation by a Hammett equation. Both p and p can be... [Pg.221]

The Unuc and Utg values indicate that there is a positive imbalance of +0.67 units of normalised effective charge on the SO3 group of atoms, needed to supply electrons to support the charge during bond fission (ttLg = 0.80), in conjunction with a bond formation of Qnuc = 0.13. The displacement mechanism is thus a highly asynchronous concerted process with a transition state structure possessing substantial, neutral monomeric, sulfur tri oxide character (Scheme 15). [Pg.223]

When dealing with quantities which show very high similarity, such as the p-space electron densities for analogous bonds in closely related molecules, we have found it more appropriate to dispense with the normalisation of Xdiscriminating definition for such cases is the family of p-space... [Pg.100]

UV-transitions in, 102-103 Neglect of differential overlap, 140, 171 Nitrobenzene, 124-125 Nodes, in an LCAO-MO. 38-41 Non-bonding orbital. 33, 76, 97-98 LCAO-coefficients of, 100-101 Normalisation... [Pg.98]

There seemed to be a very plausible reason for introducing the concept of charge in the way in which we developed it in 4.2, but there is perhaps not such an immediately obvious reason for wishing to discuss this new concept, bond order. Let us therefore confirm that equation (4-6) is a sensible definition of such a quantity by considering the simplest-possible example, ethylene. It will be recalled from 2-9 that, in this molecule, there is only one occupied molecular-orbital, Fj = (l/s/2)(2), and it contains the two -electrons of the system. We note that it is normalised, by virtue of the factor of /Jl which premultiplies the bonding combination (tj>l + 2). For this particular orbital we thus have... [Pg.138]

The simplest case is familiar enough the (un-normalised) Heitler-London (covalent) function for the homopolar bond involving two AOs (fi and 2 is... [Pg.661]

How does an investor measure the modified duration of linkers It sounds like a straightforward question and there is an easy answer, but it is sadly not the answer that people generally want. The easy answer is that a linker s modified duration is the (normalised) first derivative of price with respect to real yield, just as a conventional bond s modified duration is that with respect to nominal yield. This answer is a flippant one, because what people really want to know is some empirical rule about the sensitivity of a linker s price with respect to nominal yields, either for hedging purposes or in order to calculate aggregate duration statistics for portfolios holding both nominal and real bonds. [Pg.264]

Here the probabilities in each matrix are normalised to make the highest probability unity in each. In the more general theory, the factor x is re-expressed in terms of the rotational constraints on individual bonds, and one typically needs five such variables for an acceptable description of an un-symmetrical vinyl polymer in which each bond has three rotational states. In the above case it may simply be defined as the relative probability of the gg state in the racemic dyad. [Pg.151]

The normalisation condition requires that the total fragmentation rate of a -mer be proportional to the number of bonds ... [Pg.209]

A complementary scale, the acceptor number [6], is a measure of the ability of the solvent to accept an electron pair, and is closely related to hydrogen bonding ability. It is the normalised NMR chemical shift of the complex of triethylphosphine oxide with the test compound relative to that with the strong acceptor antimony pentafluoride (equation 12.3). [Pg.421]


See other pages where Normalised Bonds is mentioned: [Pg.182]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.412]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.351]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.279]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.123 ]




SEARCH



Normalising

© 2024 chempedia.info