Bond rearrangement, adiabatic

In chemical dynamics, one can distinguish two qualitatively different types of processes electron transfer and reactions involving bond rearrangement the latter involve heavy-particle (proton or heavier) motion in the formal reaction coordinate. The zero-order model for the electron transfer case is pre-organization of the nuclear coordinates (often predominantly the solvent nuclear coordinates) followed by pure electronic motion corresponding to a transition between diabatic electronic states. The zero-order model for the second type of process is transition state theory (or, preferably, variational transition state theory ) in the lowest adiabatic electronic state (i.e., on the lowest-energy Bom-Oppenheimer potential energy surface). 

Application of the UMP2 and G3 methods has revealed the complex mechanisms for reaction of O3 with 1-butene (CH3CH2CH=CH2), for both adiabatic and non-adiabatic reaction channels, and shown that the minimum energy crossing points play a key role. The site selectivity of the addition of O3 to either carbon atom of the double bond of 1-butene is unremarkable. The mechanisms of formation of butenols are also discussed and shown to occur not only by ketoenol tautomerization but also by a rearrangement and decomposition reaction involving the intermediate epoxide compound. ... 

In contrast, there will be many cases where continuum solvent models are less useful. These include situations where one of the goals of the simulation is to obtain a detailed picture of solvent structure, or where there is evidence that a particular structural feature of the solvent is playing a key role (for example, a specific water-macromolecule hydrogen bond). In these situations, however, explicit representation of some water combined with implicit solvation may suffice. Another example is when molecular dynamics simulations are used to study kinetic, or time-dependent phenomena. The absence of the frictional effects of solvent will lead to overestimation of rates. In addition, more subtle time-dependent effects arising from the solvent will be missing from continuum models. Continuum solvent models are in effect frilly adiabatic, in the sense that for any instantaneous macromolecular conformation, the solvent is taken to be completely relaxed. For electrostatic effects, this implies instantaneous dielectric and ionic double layer relaxation rates, and for the hydrophobic effect, instantaneous structural rearrangement. An exception would be dielectric models that involve a frequency-dependent dielectric. Nevertheless, continuum solvent models should be used with caution in studying the time dependence of macromolecular processes. 

---