Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bond length values table

The experimental carbon-carbon and carbon-sulfur bond-length values for the series 3 and 4 are in good agreement with the calculated values both in the saturated and unsaturated sulfones and sulfoxides (Table 1 and 3). Thus, it appears that the carbon-... [Pg.392]

Table VI lists the equilibrium geometries for the selected closed-shell diatomic molecules. It has long been recognized that the HF method gives reduced bond lengths. From Table VI we see that the correlated bond lengths are mostly longer than the experimental values. Exceptions are the bond distances predicted by CCD and NOF methods for the HCl molecule. Table VI lists the equilibrium geometries for the selected closed-shell diatomic molecules. It has long been recognized that the HF method gives reduced bond lengths. From Table VI we see that the correlated bond lengths are mostly longer than the experimental values. Exceptions are the bond distances predicted by CCD and NOF methods for the HCl molecule.
The two rhodium centers are distinctly nonequivalent in the solid state. The Rh(l)-P(l) and Rh(l)-P(2) bond lengths (see Table IV) are insignificantly different and are both shorter than the Rh(2)-P(3) and Rh(2)-P(4) bond lengths. The Rh(l)-P bond lengths (averaging 2.250(6) A) are the shortest ever observed in a triisopropylphosphine-rhodium structure. Values found previously in low-temperature struc-... [Pg.131]

For example, the r0 value for the Co-N bond in cobalt(III) amine complexes is smaller in parameterization schemes where 1,3-nonbonded interactions between the ligating atoms are included, than in force fields where only L-M-L angle bending functions are used. This is because the 1,3-nonbonded interactions in such complexes are highly repulsive, promoting an extension of the Co-N bonds. Thus, a smaller value for the ideal Co-N bond is required in order to reproduce the experimentally observed bond lengths. Values of r0 for force fields that do and do not include 1,3-nonbonded terms are listed in Table 3.4 (see also [,33J and Table 3.2). [Pg.50]

TiCU Geometry Optimization. The optimized Ti-Cl bond lengths (see Table I) for TiCU with a variety of basis sets are all longer than the experimental value and differ from that by 0.016 to 0.051 A. Splitting the Cl(533-53) basis set, which allows the orbitals freedom to expand or contract, only decreased the Ti-Cl bond length an average 0.005 A. However, when we add d-type polarization functions to the chlorine basis set the Ti-Cl bond distance decreases an average 0.026 A. [Pg.19]

Covalent radii estimated from homonuclear bond lengths where available and from selected heteronuclear bonds otherwise. Bond lengths from Tables of Interactomic Distances and Configuration in Molecules and Jons) Sutton. L., Ed. Spec. Publ. Nos. 11 and 18 The Chemical Society London, 1958, 1%5, except where noted. Values in parentheses are for noble gases not known to form compounds and are extrapolated from the values of neighboring nonmetals Allen, L. C. Huheey, J. E. J. Jnorg. NucJ. Chem. 1980, 42, 1523. [Pg.158]

An interesting question, as yet incompletely answered, is whether n-Jt interactions will have any effect of the geometrical parameters of a tetrapyrrole derivative. A recently obtained crystalline form of Ni(OEP) (triclinic II) currently under investigation by X-ray diffraction and resonance Raman studies, suggests that rt complexation phenomena could effect the Ni-N bond lengths. Values for this complex reported in Tables XTV, XV,... [Pg.38]

Table 2. Stractrrral properties of AM/Si(100)2xl experimental values. 0 is the AM (alkali metal) coverage, T is the adsorption temperatrrre, R is the ripple of the AM layer (distance from upper to lower AM atom in the case of the occupation of two sites), d is the vertical distance from AM atoms to the closest Si dimer atom (in the case of occupation of two sites by AM atoms, di (d2) denotes the distance from the upper (lower) AM atom). For bond length values see Table 11. Table 2. Stractrrral properties of AM/Si(100)2xl experimental values. 0 is the AM (alkali metal) coverage, T is the adsorption temperatrrre, R is the ripple of the AM layer (distance from upper to lower AM atom in the case of the occupation of two sites), d is the vertical distance from AM atoms to the closest Si dimer atom (in the case of occupation of two sites by AM atoms, di (d2) denotes the distance from the upper (lower) AM atom). For bond length values see Table 11.
Atomic and Ionic Radii of the Elements Bond Length Values Between Elements Periodic Table of Carbon Bond Lengths (A)... [Pg.23]

It was realized early on that bond lengths in molecular crystals depend mainly on the nature of the elements involved and on the bond order (the number of bonding electron pairs minus the number of antibonding ones), the crystal environment playing only a secondary role. Numerous tables and compendi-ums of bond length exist. Tables 1 and 2 list some average ( standard ) values, mainly from the most recent and comprehensive reviews by Kennard et aL based on the data from the CSD. [Pg.941]

As in the case of ions we can assign values to covalent bond lengths and covalent bond radii. Interatomic distances can be measured by, for example. X-ray and electron diffraction methods. By halving the interatomic distances obtained for diatomic elements, covalent bond radii can be obtained. Other covalent bond radii can be determined by measurements of bond lengths in other covalently bonded compounds. By this method, tables of multiple as well as single covalent bond radii can be determined. A number of single covalent bond radii in nm are at the top of the next page. [Pg.48]

The Universal Force Field, UFF, is one of the so-called whole periodic table force fields. It was developed by A. Rappe, W Goddard III, and others. It is a set of simple functional forms and parameters used to model the structure, movement, and interaction of molecules containing any combination of elements in the periodic table. The parameters are defined empirically or by combining atomic parameters based on certain rules. Force constants and geometry parameters depend on hybridization considerations rather than individual values for every combination of atoms in a bond, angle, or dihedral. The equilibrium bond lengths were derived from a combination of atomic radii. The parameters [22, 23], including metal ions [24], were published in several papers. [Pg.350]

In Table 1-9 we have collected only the 7r-bond orders calculated by allvalence-electrons methods and compared their values with those deduced from experimental bond lengths. Both data are indicative of an aromatic molecule with a large dienic character. The 2-3 and 4-5 bonds especially present a large double-bond character, whereas both C-S bonds are relatively simple. [Pg.39]

Table 5.3 Values of bond length in the Tq, and in the equilibrium configuration, r, zero-point vibrational state, e, for N2... Table 5.3 Values of bond length in the Tq, and in the equilibrium configuration, r, zero-point vibrational state, e, for N2...

See other pages where Bond length values table is mentioned: [Pg.136]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.282]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.542]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.719]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.763]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.712]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.134]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.84 ]




SEARCH



Bond lengths, table

Bond values

Bonds Table

Table 1 values

© 2024 chempedia.info