Bond distances elements

Solid state NMR is a relatively recent spectroscopic technique that can be used to uniquely identify and quantitate crystalline phases in bulk materials and at surfaces and interfaces. While NMR resembles X-ray diffraction in this capacity, it has the additional advantage of being element-selective and inherently quantitative. Since the signal observed is a direct reflection of the local environment of the element under smdy, NMR can also provide structural insights on a molecularlevel. Thus, information about coordination numbers, local symmetry, and internuclear bond distances is readily available. This feature is particularly usefrd in the structural analysis of highly disordered, amorphous, and compositionally complex systems, where diffraction techniques and other spectroscopies (IR, Raman, EXAFS) often fail. 

The only structurally characterized In—Sb adduct is (Me3SiCH2)3 In—Sb(Tms)3 19 [38], featuring an In—Sb bond distance of 300.8(1) pm. Due to the lack of other structurally characterized In—Sb adducts, no structural comparisons can be made. The In—Sb bond length found in 19 is supposed to be at the lower end of the In—Sb dative bond range since the covalent radius of In (r ov 143 pm) is about 17 pm larger than those of the lighter elements Al and Ga. Therefore, In—Sb dative bonds are expected to... 

The substituents bound to Al and the group 15 element E generally adopt a staggered conformation relative to one another. The Al—N bond distances, which range from 197.2(4) 63 to 198.8(3) pm 60, are almost equal, indicating no significant electronic influence of the specific group 15 element on the... 

Other single-crystal x-ray diffraction studies of transition element dopants in jS-rh boron are based on the results of a refinement of the /3-rh boron structure that establishes the occurrence of four new low-occupancy (3.7, 6.6, 6.8 and 8.5%) B positions in addition to the earlier known ones. The dopant elements studied, Sc, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zr, Nb, Hf and Ta, do not enter B positions in the framework, but they enter the Al, A2, D and E positions. In some cases the doping elements have been studied at several concentrations for each element and for different cooling rates. The percentage occupancies of certain positions are eorrelated with the atomie sizes of the dopants. The bond distances between the polyhedra are shorter than those within the polyhedra. The mechanism of doping for some cases is denoted displacive, rather than interstitial or substitutional, because of competing interactions between the six different partially occupied B positions and dopant atoms. 

Another noteworthy example is x-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS). EXAFS data contain information on such parameters as coordination number, bond distances, and mean-square displacements for atoms that comprise the first few coordination spheres surrounding an absorbing element of interest. This information is extracted from the EXAFS oscillations, previously isolated from the background and atomic portion of the absorption, using nonlinear least-square fit procedures. It is important in such analyses to compare metrical parameters obtained from experiments on model or reference compounds to those for samples of unknown structure, in order to avoid ambiguity in the interpretation of results and to establish error limits. 

It should also be stated that the M-E bond distances within the Et3M <— E(SiMe3)3 and t-Bu3M <- E(/-Pr)3 adduct families increase by about 40 pm according to the increase of the covalent radii of the group 15 element (rCOv(P) 110 pm, rcov(Bi) 150 pm). Within the sterically overcrowded t-Bu3M <— E(z-Pr)3 adduct families the arsine and bismuthine adducts show... 

Bismuth phosphine complexes represent a substantial component of the established phosphine complexes of heavier p-block elements, and an excellent overview has presented an important bonding model for these systems (7). The observed structures are considered as trigonal-pyramidal BiX3 units with three secondary trans bonds. If the acceptor orbitals are the Bi-X trans arrangement is expected, as the relationship between the trans X-Bi-P bond distances. The shortest Bi-P distance [2.7614(2) vs 2.866(3) A] is trans to the longer Bi-Br distance [3.403(1) vs 2.9916(1) A], as the only arrangement that will allow the phosphine ligands to occupy trans... 

It did not prove possible to synthesize a substituent-free Ga complex with formula Cp (CO)2Fe Fe(CO)4 Ga (Scheme 13).43 Addition of bipy to 30 resulted in halide elimation, but the main group element in the product 31 was coordinated by the bipy ligand. Upon addition of dppe, however, substitution of the carbonyl ligands occurred instead along with halide ion elimination to produce the substituent-free Ga complex 32. It has a linear coordination environment (Fe-Ga-Fe angle = 176.01(4)°), and the Ga-Fe bond distances are much shorter than in those related adducts where donor ligands are also bound to the Ga atom.43 The authors attributed the non-observation of the carbonyl derivative to a need for an electron-rich metal center to stabilize the Fe-Ga bond via 7r-backdonation. 

---