Block Diagram Transformations

A complete set of Block Diagram Transformation Theorems is given in Table 4.1. 

Fig. 3. A block diagram schematic representation of a Fourier transform nmr spectrometer, ie, a superconducting magnetic resonance system.

Using block diagram algebra and Laplace transform variables, the controlled variable C(.s) is given by... 

Fig. 4.1 Block diagram of a closed-loop control system. R s) = Laplace transform of reference input r(t) C(s) = Laplace transform of controlled output c(t) B s) = Primary feedback signal, of value H(s)C(s) E s) = Actuating or error signal, of value R s) - B s), G s) = Product of all transfer functions along the forward path H s) = Product of all transfer functions along the feedback path G s)H s) = Open-loop transfer function = summing point symbol, used to denote algebraic summation = Signal take-off point Direction of information flow.

After Laplace transform, a differential equation of deviation variables can be thought of as an input-output model with transfer functions. The causal relationship of changes can be represented by block diagrams. 

Example 2.16. Derive the closed-loop transfer function X,/U for the block diagram in Fig. E2.16a. We will see this one again in Chapter 4 on state space models. With the integrator 1/s, X2 is the Laplace transform of the time derivative of x,(t), and X3 is the second order derivative of x,(t). 

In Fig. 5.1, we use the actual variables because they are what we measure. Regardless of the notations in a schematic diagram, the block diagram in Fig. 5.2 is based on deviation variables and their Laplace transform. 

The result is the most useful of all the Laplace transformations. It says that the operation of differentiation in the time domain is replaced by multiplication by s in the Laplace domain, minus an initial condition. This is where perturbation variables become so useful. If the initial condition is the steadystate operating level, all the initial conditions like are equal to zero. Then simple multiplication by s is equivalent to differentiation. An ideal derivative unit or a perfect differentiator can be represented in block-diagram form as shown in Fig. 9.3. 

Fig. 2 Block diagram of a Bruker Equinox 55 Fourier transform (FT) IR spectrometer...

Figure 11 shows a block diagram of a typical differential pressure flow detection circuit. The DP transmitter operation is dependent on the pressure difference across an orifice, venturi, or flow tube. This differential pressure is used to position a mechanical device such as a bellows. The bellows acts against spring pressure to reposition the core of a differential transformer. The transformer s output voltage on each of two secondary windings varies with a change in flow. 

The optical layout of our FT-IR-VCD instrument is based on a Nicolet 7199 Fourier transform spectrometer. A block diagram of the optical and electronic components of the instrument is shown in Figure 4. The instrument has been described in detail in several previous publications [57,68,75], and some of the more recent changes in the instrument will be indicated below. 

Figure 10.16. Schematic block diagram of a pulsed-nozzle Fourier transform microwave spectrometer [15].

Block Diagram Analysis One shortcoming of this feedforward design procedure is that it is based on the steady-state characteristics of the process and, as such, neglects process (Ramies (i.e., how fast the controlled variable responds to changes in the load and manipulated variables). Thus, it is often necessary to include dynamic compensation in the feedforward controller. The most direct method of designing the FF dynamic compensator is to use a block dir rram of a general process, as shown in Fig. 8-34, where G, represents the disturbance transmitter, (iis the feedforward controller, Cj relates the disturbance to the controlled variable, G is the valve, Gp is the process, G is the output transmitter, and G is the feedback controller. All blocks correspond to transfer fimetions (via Laplace transforms). 

Figure 3.5. Block diagrams for multichannel and multiplex Raman spectrometers. FT indicates computer for performing a Fourier transform.

Fig. 8.2. Block diagram of optical and electronic layout of the VCD part of Fourier transform spectrometer. 

The upper part of the block diagram in Fig. 4 depicts the watermark detection scheme for one stmcture Mj. First, the data is transformed into its canonical representation. Next, the received vector rj is extracted. The extraction method must be identical to the host vector extraction used for watermark embedding. Thus, the length of rj is also Lx J. Second, tlie 64-bit hash of Mj is derived and the pseudo-random vectors t j. kj and ij are computed dependent on the copyright holders key K. After applying tlie spread transform, the demodulated soft watennark letters yj are derived from and kj as described in Section 2. The probability p dn,j = 1) of receiving a watennark letter dnj = 1 from the nth clement of is given by... 

Figure 15. Block diagram of pulsed Fourier transform NMR spectrometer (from [120]).

Fig. 26. Block diagram of the optics of the triangle common-path interferometer Fourier transform spectrometer S, light source BS, beam splitter M1, M2,M 3, plane mirrors r, lens d, self-scanning photodiode array. [Redrawn from Okamoto et al. (139) with permission.]...

Consider the block diagram of a direct digital feedback control loop shown in Figure 29.9. Such loops contain both continuous- and discrete-time signals and dynamic elements. Three samplers are present to indicate the discrete-time nature of the set point j/Sp( ), control command c(z), and sampled process output y(z). The continuous signals are denoted by their Laplace transforms [i.e., y(s), Jn(s), and d(s)]. Furthermore, the continuous dynamic elements (e.g., hold, process, disturbance element) are denoted by their continuous transfer functions, H(s), Gp(s), and GAs), respectively. For the control algorithm, which is the only discrete element, we have used its discrete transfer function, D(z). 

---