Bisubstrate enzyme mechanisms examples

Many other multisubstrate examples abound in metabolism. In effect, these situations are managed by realizing that the interaction of the enzyme with its many substrates can be treated as a series of uni- or bisubstrate steps in a multi-step reaction pathway. Thus, the complex mechanism of a multisubstrate reaction is resolved into a sequence of steps, each of which obeys the single- and double-displacement patterns just discussed. 

The example of methotrexate points out that the inhibition modality of dead end inhibitors, with respect to a specific substrate, will depend on the reaction mechanism of the target enzyme. Thus a complete understanding of inhibition mechanism requires an understanding of the underlying reaction mechanism of the target enzyme. A comprehensive discussion of these issues has been provided by Segel (1975). Table 3.6 summarizes the pattern of dead-end inhibition observed for competitive inhibitors of one substrate in the common bisubstrate reaction mecha-... 

We saw in Chapter 3 that bisubstrate reactions can conform to a number of different reaction mechanisms. We saw further that the apparent value of a substrate Km (KT) can vary with the degree of saturation of the other substrate of the reaction, in different ways depending on the mechanistic details. Hence the determination of balanced conditions for screening of an enzyme that catalyzes a bisubstrate reaction will require a prior knowledge of reaction mechanism. This places a necessary, but often overlooked, burden on the scientist to determine the reaction mechanism of the enzyme before finalizing assay conditions for HTS purposes. The importance of this mechanistic information cannot be overstated. We have already seen, in the examples of methotrexate inhibition of dihydrofolate, mycophenolic acid inhibiton of IMP dehydrogenase, and epristeride inhibition of steroid 5a-reductase (Chapter 3), how the [5]/A p ratio can influence one s ability to identify uncompetitive inhibitors of bisubstrate reactions. We have also seen that our ability to discover uncompetitive inhibitors of such reactions must be balanced with our ability to discover competitive inhibitors as well. 

Almost all enzymes—in contrast to the simplified description given on p. 92—have more than one substrate or product. On the other hand, it is rare for more than two substrates to be bound simultaneously. In bisubstrate reactions of the type A + B C+D, a number of reaction sequences are possible. In addition to the sequential mechanisms (see p.90), in which all substrates are bound in a specific sequence before the product is released, there are also mechanisms in which the first substrate A is bound and immediately cleaved. A part of this substrate remains bound to the enzyme, and is then transferred to the second substrate B after the first product C has been released. This is known as the ping-pong mechanism, and it is used by transaminases, for example (see p.l78). In the Lineweaver— Burk plot (right see p.92), it can be recognized in the parallel shifting of the lines when [B] is varied. 

---