Binding energy interpretation

Binding Energy interpretation of Different Forms of Alumina... 

Values of the reciprocal of the covalent radius for ligancy 12 are shown in Fig. 3. It is seen that the points for each sequence can be represented by three curves. The first curve for each sequence represents the effect of the increase in valence from 2 to 6 and the corresponding increase in binding energy for C to Cr, Sr to Mo, and Ba to W. Each of these curves is extrapolated to a maximum at v — 8.3, corresponding to nine spd orbitals with 0.7 metallic electron. It is seen that for all three sequences the values deviate from the extrapolated curves. From Cr to Ni they are represented by a straight line, interpreted as corresponding to the constant value 6 for the metallic valence. 

Electron propagator theory generates a one-electron picture of electronic structure that includes electron correlation. One-electron energies may be obtained reliably for closed-shell molecules with the P3 method and more complex correlation effects can be treated with renormalized reference states and orbitals. To each electron binding energy, there corresponds a Dyson orbital that is a correlated generalization of a canonical molecular orbital. Electron propagator theory enables interpretation of precise ab initio calculations in terms of one-electron concepts. 

Interpretation was con licated by the presence of other peaks in the binding energy region of the Re nd... 

Electrochemical reactions are driven by the potential difference at the solid liquid interface, which is established by the electrochemical double layer composed, in a simple case, of water and two types of counter ions. Thus, provided the electrochemical interface is preserved upon emersion and transfer, one always has to deal with a complex coadsorption experiment. In contrast to the solid/vacuum interface, where for instance metal adsorption can be studied by evaporating a metal onto the surface, electrochemical metal deposition is always a coadsorption of metal ions, counter ions, and probably water dipols, which together cause the potential difference at the surface. This complex situation has to be taken into account when interpreting XPS data of emersed electrode surfaces in terms of chemical shifts or binding energies. 

The origin of the electrochemical shift is not well understood yet. It is very likely that the phenomenon can be explained on the basis of known effects contributing to the chemical shift (see Section 3.2.5). It is clear, however, as long as the effect is not understood, interpretation of binding energies of weakly adsorbed electrochemical species will be difficult. 

Awareness of the very rapid migration of the H+ species provides a valuable orientation for the interpretation of many experiments. One of the most important of the examples discussed in the later parts of Section 3 has to do with the binding energy of the complexes AH that hydrogen forms with various shallow acceptors A. The lifetime of such a complex with respect to thermal dissociation into H+ and A can be measured in some types of annealing experiments, and this lifetime is related to the... 

---