Benzodiazepine receptor agonists adverse effects

This section describes the partial agonists and the nonbenzodiazepine drugs that act at the benzodiazepine receptor. What these drugs have in common is that their development has been driven by the search for effective anxiolytics that do not have the adverse effects of sedation, amnesia, ataxia, interaction with alcohol, or the problems of tolerance, dependency, and withdrawal seen with classic benzodiazepines. These problems have been addressed by the development of partial agonists, subtype-selective ligands, and other drugs, the cyclopyrrolones, which do not seem to cause these problems. 

Alpidem. Alpidem is an imidazopyridine partial agonist that also shows relative selectivity for the type I benzodiazepine receptor. Studies have shown an anxiolytic effect comparable with the classic benzodiazepines, but with an improved adverse effect profile [Pancheri et al. 1993). It has also been compared with buspirone in patients with generalized anxiety disorder and shown to be more rapidly effective and again to have a more favorable adverse effect profile [Legris et al. 1993). Longer-term studies with alpidem have shown that tolerance does not occur, and no significant problems of withdrawal on discontinuation were found [Chevalier et al. 1993). Alpidem was licensed in France for the treatment of anxiety but has now been suspended because of recent reports of alpidem-induced hepatic dysfunction. The reason for this is unclear, but it may be a reflection of the fact that alpidem also binds to peripheral benzodiazepine receptors, which are present in high density in the liver. 

From the published clinical studies, it would appear that the partial agonists bretazenil and abercamil are less likely to cause physiological dependence, have lower reinforcing effects and a lower incidence of subjective effects associated with abuse liability than the conventional 1,4-benzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics. It is presently unclear whether the full agonists for the GABA-A receptor, zolpidem and zopiclone, offer a real advance in the treatment of insomnia although their adverse effect profiles and abuse liability may be lower than that of the conventional benzodiazepines. 

Abecarnil is a partial agonist at the benzodiazepine -GABA receptor complex, and is used in generalized anxiety disorder. Its pharmacology suggests that it may be less likely to produce sedation and tolerance, but data thus far have not shown clear differences in its adverse effects from those of classical benzodiazepines, such as alprazolam, diazepam, and lorazepam. As expected, both acute adverse effects and tolerance are dose-related. 

Zaleplon is a non-benzodiazepine that induces sleep comparable to other hypnotics but with significantly fewer residual effects (1), related at least in part to its short half-life. It is a pyrazolopyrimidine hypnotic that binds selectively to the GABAa1a receptor, previously known as the benzodiazepine type 1 (BDZi) receptor. Whereas such agonist selectivity was hoped to confer advantages in terms of the risk of adverse effects, in practice zaleplon is similar to the older non-selective benzodiazepines in terms of both efficacy and safety (2-4). The so-called Z drugs, including zaleplon, are significantly more expensive than benzodiazepines and are therefore likely to be less cost-effective (5). 

---