Behavioral markers

Depatie L, O Driscoll G, Holahan AL, Atkinson V, Thavundayuil J, et al. 2002. Nicotine and behavioral markers of risk for schizophrenia A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Neuropsychopharma-cology27 1056-1070. 

Spirduso WW, Gillam PE, Schallert T, Upchurch M, Vaughn DM, Wilcox RE (1985) Reactive capacity a sensitive behavioral marker of movement initiation and nigrostriatal dopamine function. Brain Res 335 45-54. 

Flin, R. and Martin, L. (2001). Behavioral markers for crew resource management a review of current practice. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 11(1), 95-118. 

In CBAS, each competence is represented by a set of performance criteria. The criteria are formulated in the jargon of the air traffic controllers in order to maximize comprehension and recognition of behaviors. They have been given the format of behavioral markers (O Cotmor, Hormann, Flin, Lodge, and Goeters, 2002) and are rated on a six point scale. The use of these performance criteria is important as they allow controllers, in their role of assessors, to express their gut feeling , and to specify why a trainee performs (in)sufficiently and what should be done by way of individual training interventions. 

Haeusler, R., Klampfer, B., Amacher, A. and Naef, W. (2004). Behavioral markers in analyzing team performance of cockpit crews. In R. Dietrich and T.M. Childress (eds), Group Interaction in High Risk Environments, (pp. 25-37). Aldershot Ashgate. 

Observation of behavior using behavioral markers in real or simulated activities... 

Figure 3 shows calibration plots of log (particle diameter) vs. elution voliame difference (AV) between marker and particle using three different monodisperse latexes at a low eluant ionic strength of 1.29 mM SLS. These results illustrate the featiire of universal calibration behavior predicted by the capillary bed model as mentioned earlier. Of note also is the fact that the curve deviates from linearity for the 38 nm particle and begins to approach the origin as also indicated by the model calculations. 

Markers of hepatic encephalopathy include decreased cognition, confusion, changes in behavior, and asterixis. 

Bonithon-Kopp et al. (1986b) investigated another potential marker for lead exposure. Maternal and infant hair lead levels, determined from hair samples taken at birth, were found to be correlated inversely with results on neurobehavioral tests (McCarthy Scales of Children s Abilities) when the children were tested at 6 years of age. Other studies have also reported associations between hair lead levels and behavioral or cognitive test scores, but measures of lead in hair may not accurately reflect internal body burden of lead, and such data should not be used to evaluate internal dose-response relationships (EPA 1986a). 

Evans HL New York University Medical Center, New York, NY Behavioral and biochemical markers of human lead exposures (human, rat) National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences... 

Figure 2-2 shows the results calculated with this program. The heavy solid line is the analytical solution, and the lines with markers on them show the results for delx = 3 and 10 years. The inset shows, over a longer time span, the behavior of the numerical solution for delx = 20 years. This... 

In sum, this is how ideal indicators of taxa behave—they intercorrelate in samples where taxon members and nonmembers are mixed, and they do not correlate in pure samples of taxon members or in pure samples of nontaxon members. This behavior of taxon markers is captured by a reduced General Covariance Mixture Theorem (GCMT for the derivation of the theorem... 

First, we conjecture that each item is a separate marker of the taxon. Now there is a pool of indicators to work with. Second, we choose a random pair of indicators, for example, item 1 ( When I go shopping, I check several times to be sure I have my wallet/ purse with me ) and item 2 ( Before I leave my house, I check whether all windows are closed ), as the output indicators. Third, we sum scores on items 3 to 8, which makes a 7-point scale that ranges from 0 (none of the 6 checking behaviors are endorsed) to 6 (all of the 6 checking behaviors are endorsed) this is the input variable. Fourth, we calculate the covariance between items 1 and 2 in a subsample of individuals who scored 0 on the input variable, next we calculate the covariance for individuals who scored 1 on the input variable, and so forth. Fifth, we choose another pair of output indicators (e.g., items 1 and 3), and combine the other six items together to make a new input variable. This process is repeated 28 times until all possible pairs are drawn (1-2 and 2-1 are not considered different pairs). Next, we take 28 covariances from 0 subsamples and average them we do the same for all seven sets of numbers and plot the average covariances. SSMAXCOV plots look similar to the plots from the MAXCOV section and are interpreted the same way. 

There is a widespread consensus that five major factors (Big Five) describe a significant part of variance in the domain of personality. They are Extraversion, Neuroticism, Conscientiousness, Agreeableness and Openness. The behavior genetic findings for these factors are summarized in Table 6 which presents the intraclass correlations for MZA, DZA, MZT and DZT twins and the genetic and environmental parameter estimates for the Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire (MPQ) markers of the Big Five. 

For an eventual structural and functional grammar of behavior many types of hidden patterns must be considered. Human behavior is here viewed as the performance of members of the proposed T-pattern family. These are particular types of repeated hierar-chical/syntactic intra- and interindividual real-time patterns describing related aspects of the temporal organization of verbal and/or nonverbal behavior. Related terms are a) markers T-pattem components with particular pre-, post-, and/or bi -dictive powers b)... 

---