Basis superposition

As noted above, the use of effective potentials to link the active electronic subspace with the bulk is at an early stage of development. There is evidence that increasing the number of active electrons in the second layer of the cluster, for example by increasing the polarizability of the third layer, favors adsorption in the hollow (fee) site for both H and CH. It is only for CH that the effect is large, however, leading to an increase in the adsorption energy for the hollow site by 0.4 eV as shown in Table I. Basis superposition corrections can also influence the relative stability of the two types of 3-fold sites and these corrections are not yet available for the CH and CH adsorption cases. From the... 

Perturbation theory offers some advantages in this respect. It is also subject to basis superposition error, but the contributions in which such errors may occur can be identified, and it is possible to make an estimate of the error and to correct for it to some extent. The charge-transfer energy is subject to basis superposition error, but it is possible to estimate the contribution of this error to the result. The extension correlation and double charge transfer terms are wholly due to basis superposition effects, to lowest order in overlap at least[l8], and can be discarded. The charge-transfer correlation and dispersion terms, on the other hand, can have no basis superposition error at all because they can only arise when occupied orbitals of both molecules are present[193. 

Finally one should point out the occurrence of the basis set superposition effect (each unit cell in a quasi-ID polymer is better described because the basis functions of its neighbours also exert an effect, rather than as a single molecule). The basis set superposition causes only an error if one wants to calculate the cohesion energy of a chain or of a 2D or 3D periodic system, because then one has to calculate the energy difference of the extended system and the sum of its constituents. This basis superposition effect occurs both at the HF and at the correlation corrected (QP) level and causes that already at the MP2 level, if one uses a double basis with polarization functions, and one obtains 70-75% of the correlation energy. 

For bound state systems, eigenfunctions of the nuclear Hamiltonian can be found by diagonalization of the Hamiltonian matiix in Eq. (11). These functions are the possible nuclear states of the system, that is, the vibrational states. If these states are used as a basis set, the wave function after excitation is a superposition of these vibrational states, with expansion coefficients given by the Frank-Condon overlaps. In this picture, the dynamics in Figure 4 can be described by the time evolution of these expansion coefficients, a simple phase factor. The periodic motion in coordinate space is thus related to a discrete spectrum in energy space. 

An alternative to using a superposition of Gaussian functions is to extend the basis set by using Hermite polynomials, that is, hamonic oscillator functions [24]. This provides an orthonormal, in principle complete, basis set along the bajectoiy, and the idea has been taken up by Billing [151,152]. The basic problem with this approach is the slow convergence of the basis set. 

To deal with the problem of using a superposition of functions, Heller also tried using Gaussian wave packets with a fixed width as a time-dependent basis set for the representation of the evolving nuclear wave function [23]. Each frozen Gaussian function evolves under classical equations of motion, and the phase is provided by the classical action along the path... 

There are a number of other technical details associated with HF and other ah initio methods that are discussed in other chapters. Basis sets and basis set superposition error are discussed in more detail in Chapters 10 and 28. For open-shell systems, additional issues exist spin polarization, symmetry breaking, and spin contamination. These are discussed in Chapter 27. Size-consistency and size-extensivity are discussed in Chapter 26. 

There is also a local MP2 (LMP2) method. LMP2 calculations require less CPU time than MP2 calculations. LMP2 is also less susceptible to basis set superposition error. The price of these improvements is that about 98% of the MP2 energy correction is recovered by LMP2. 

It is a well-known fact that the Hartree-Fock model does not describe bond dissociation correctly. For example, the H2 molecule will dissociate to an H+ and an atom rather than two H atoms as the bond length is increased. Other methods will dissociate to the correct products however, the difference in energy between the molecule and its dissociated parts will not be correct. There are several different reasons for these problems size-consistency, size-extensivity, wave function construction, and basis set superposition error. 

Diffuse functions are those functions with small Gaussian exponents, thus describing the wave function far from the nucleus. It is common to add additional diffuse functions to a basis. The most frequent reason for doing this is to describe orbitals with a large spatial extent, such as the HOMO of an anion or Rydberg orbitals. Adding diffuse functions can also result in a greater tendency to develop basis set superposition error (BSSE), as described later in this chapter. 

BSSE (basis set superposition error) an error introduced when using an incomplete basis set... 

The isothermal curves of mechanical properties in Chap. 3 are actually master curves constructed on the basis of the principles described here. Note that the manipulations are formally similar to the superpositioning of isotherms for crystallization in Fig. 4.8b, except that the objective here is to connect rather than superimpose the segments. Figure 4.17 shows a set of stress relaxation moduli measured on polystyrene of molecular weight 1.83 X 10 . These moduli were measured over a relatively narrow range of readily accessible times and over the range of temperatures shown in Fig. 4.17. We shall leave as an assignment the construction of a master curve from these data (Problem 10). 

This is simpler than the first solution but this approach is only convenient for the simple loading sequence of stress on-stress off. If this sequence is repeated many times then this superposition approach becomes rather complex. In these cases the analytical solution shown below is recommended but it should be remembered that the equations used were derived on the basis of the superposition approach illustrated above. 

---