Rossler attractor

Phase plane plots are not the best means of investigating these complex dynamics, for in such cases (which are at least 3-dimensional) the three (or more) dimensional phase planes can be quite complex as shown in Figures 16 and 17 (A-2) for two of the best known attractors, the Lorenz strange attractor [80] and the Rossler strange attractor [82, 83]. Instead stroboscopic maps for forced systems (nonautonomous) and Poincare maps for autonomous systems are better suited for investigating these types of complex dynamic behavior. 

Final trajectories of the Rossler attractor [82, 83] for different values of a. 

The Lorenz and Rossler models are deterministic models and their strange attractors are therefore called deterministic chaos to emphasize the fact that this is not a random or stochastic behavior. 

Figure 3.5 The Rossler strange attractor. (A) The phase space. (B) The state variable yi (t). (C) Reconstruction in the pseudophase space.

Figure 3.5 illustrates the model of the Rossler strange attractor [32], The set of nonlinear differential equations is... 

In theculinary spirit ofthe pastry map and the baker s map, Otto Rossler (1976) found inspiration in a taffy-pulling machine. By pondering its action, he was led to a system of three differential equations with a simpler strange attractor than Lorenz s. The Rossler system has only one quadratic nonlinearity xz ... 

In the exercises, you re asked to do similar calibrations of the method using quasi-periodic data as well as time series f rom the Lorenz and Rossler attractors. 

Numerically integrate the Rossler system for a = 0.4, 6=2, c = 4, and obtain a long time series for x(f). Then use the attractor-reconstruction method for various values of the delay and plot (x(f), x(f + t)). Find a value of t for which the reconstructed attractor looks similar to the actual Rossler attractor. How does that T compare to typical orbital periods of the system ... 

Some of the oscillatory solutions, in particular those found in the abstract models of Rossler, are attractors, moreover they are chaotic. These mathematical solutions are interesting in that many oscillations observed experimentally are probably of this nature, and if studied with models encompassing the true behavior of the reaction they can be obtained theoretically. These chaotic attractors are illustrated by the examples given in Section III.I. 

R13) 1979-2 Rossler, O. E. Chaos and Strange Attractors in Chemical Kinetics, Springer Series in Synergetics, vol. 3, 107-113... 

A to the first line, Rossler (1976) was the first to provide a chemical model of chaos. It was not a mass-action-type model, but a three-variable system with Michaelis-Menten-type kinetics. Next Schulmeister (1978) presented a three-variable Lotka-type mechanism with depot. This is a mass-action-type model. In the same year Rossler (1978) presented a combination of a Lotka-Volterra oscillator and a switch he calls the Cause switch showing chaos. This model was constructed upon the principles outlines by Rossler (1976a) and is a three-variable nonconservative model. Next Gilpin (1979) gave a complicated Lotka-Volterra-type example. Arneodo and his coworkers (1980, 1982) were able to construct simple Lotka-Volterra models in three as well as in four variables having a strange attractor. 

Rossler argued that the very long-term qualitative dynamic behaviour of an evolving chemical system cannot be analysed. The attractor can be different from the present known attractors dynamic systems describing evolution internally select a sequence of subsystems in which each generates a viable successor even if the environment changes during the process. 

ERDI - The coexistence of limit cycles has been demonstrated in a Rossler model. What about the possibility for finding coexistent strange attractors in systems of polynomial ODE ... 

The results summarized above are consistent with the general view developed at the beginning of this section on the robustness of the chaotic attractor and p icularly of the statistical properties of the dynamics toward fluctuations. This is rather remarkable, since the Willamowski-Rossler attractor is highly inhomogeneous and certainly not everywhere hyperbolic. It suggests that deterministic chaos in real-world systems where attractor inhomogeneity is ubiquitous retains fully its relevance in that it determines, up to small corrections, the most probable states of the system. 

The Willamowski-RSssler rate equations yield both periodic and chaotic attractors as the system parameters are tuned [10,21]. One common scenario for the appearance of a chaotic attractor is a cascade of ppriod-doubling bifurcations. As can be seen in the bifurcation diagram in Figure 2, the Willamowski-Rossler reaction possesses such a bifurcation sequence the chaotic attractor is followed by a reverse cascade of period doublings leading, ultimately, to a steady state. 

---