Atoms classical complex rotation

Classical complex rotation of the coordinate z in the form z —> zel°. In this approach we have obtained precise results for atomic systems in strong fields from the lower bound of the over-barrier regime up to superstrong fields corresponding to regime Re.E << Imi [39]. On the other hand, this method cannot be immediately applied to molecular systems in our direct mesh approach [42,39]. 

Microwave studies in molecular beams are usually limited to studying the ground vibrational state of the complex. For complexes made up of two molecules (as opposed to atoms), the intennolecular vibrations are usually of relatively low amplitude (though there are some notable exceptions to this, such as the ammonia dimer). Under these circumstances, the methods of classical microwave spectroscopy can be used to detennine the stmcture of the complex. The principal quantities obtained from a microwave spectmm are the rotational constants of the complex, which are conventionally designated A, B and C in decreasing order of magnitude there is one rotational constant 5 for a linear complex, two constants (A and B or B and C) for a complex that is a symmetric top and tliree constants (A, B and C) for an... 

Since the forward peak is clearly from high J collisions, it is clearly produced via a rapidly rotating intermediate exhibiting an enhanced time delay. Further insight into the associated dynamics is provided by a classical trajectory simulation by Skodje. The forward peak results from the sideway collisions of the H atom on the HD-diatom (see Fig. 37). At the point where the transition state region is first reached, the collision complex is already oriented about 70° relative to the center-of-mass collision axis. The intermediate then rotates rapidly with an angular frequency of u> J/I, where / is the moment of inertia of the intermediate. If the intermediate with a time delay of the order of the lifetime r, the intermediate can rotate... 

Another example where aromaticity plays an important role is the barrier to the rotation of amides (compound 18 is represented with N in the middle to indicate any azole) [31]. In classical amides, like dimethylformamide (15), the calculated barrier is 80.1-81.0 kJ mol1 (MP2/6-311++G ), which compares well with the experimental barriers of 91.2 (solution) and 85.8 kJ mol1 (gas-phase) [32], The cases of A-formylaziridine (16) and iV-formyl-2-azirine (17) are more complex due to the pyramidalization of the nitrogen atom and the presence of rotation and inversion barriers [32], The effect of the antiaromatic character of 2-azirine (four electrons) [18] on the barrier is difficult to assess due to changes in the ring strain. 

Ethylene has the well-known classical >2/1 structure with a barrier to rotation. The next in complexity of the simple hydrides is the methyl radical CH3. The obvious (sp2) planar arrangement can only accommodate six of the seven valence electrons. The electronic configuration of this molecule can therefore not be described in terms of either atomic wave functions or hybrid orbitals. An alternative approach is to view the structure of the methyl radical as a reduced-symmetry form, derived from the structure of methane, to be considered next. 

Two points should be emphasized. First, according to classical structure theory, all the equivalent positions of a given set should be occupied and moreover they should all be occupied by atoms of the same kind. In later chapters we shall note examples of crystals in which one or both of these criteria are not satisfied an obvious case is a solid solution in which atoms of different elements occupy at random one or more sets of equivalent positions. (The occupation of different sets of equivalent positions by atoms of the same kind occurs frequently and may lead to quite different environments of chemically similar atoms. Examples include the numerous crystals in which there is both tetrahedral and octahedral coordination of atoms of the same element—in the same oxidation state—as noted in Chapter 5, and crystals in which there is both coplanar and tetrahedral coordination of Cu(ii), p. 890, or Ni(ii), p. 965.) The second point for emphasis is if a molecule (or complex ion) is situated at one of the special positions it should possess the point symmetry of that position. A molecule lying on a plane of symmetry must itself possess a plane of symmetry, and one having its centre at the intersection of two planes of symmetry must itself possess two perpendicular planes of symmetry. If, therefore, it can be demonstrated that a molecule lies at such a position as, for example, would be the case if the unit cell of Fig. 2.13 contained only one molecule, (a fact deducible from the density of the crystal) this would constitute a proof of the symmetry of the molecule. Such a conclusion is not, of course, valid if there is any question of random orientation or free rotation of the molecules. Moreover, there is another reason for caution in applying this type of argument to inorganic crystals. 

---