Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Atomic interactions closed-shell

The system of equations (1.8) is based on the central field approximation, and therefore its application to real atoms is entirely dependent on the existence of closed shells, which restore spherical symmetry in each successive row of the periodic table. For spherically symmetric atoms with closed shells, the Hartree-Fock equations do not involve neglecting noncentral electrostatic interactions and are therefore said to apply exactly. This does not mean that they are expected to yield exact values for the experimental energies, but merely that they will apply better than for atoms which are not centrally symmetric. One should bear in mind that, in any real atom, there are many excited configurations, which mix in even with the ground state and which are not spherically symmetric. Even if one could include all of them in a Hartree-Fock multiconfigura-tional calculation, they would not be exactly represented. Consequently, there is no such thing as an exact solution for any many-electron atom, even under the most favourable assumptions of spherical symmetry. [Pg.12]

Let us analyze some examples where this interaction is present. These examples establish a great affinity between gold atoms, which are as close as possible to each other and. generally, at distances even shorter than the ones found in metallic gold (2.88 A). We excluded gold clusters with formal metal-metal bonds and oxidation states between 0 and +i from the description. We will refer only to the interactions among atoms with closed-shell configurations. [Pg.82]

For example, the Carbon-atom 3P(Ml=1, Ms=0) = [ p ppQ(x + p apoP ] and 3P(Ml=0, Ms=0) = 2-C2 [Ip Pp. aj + piap-iP ] states interact quite differently in a collision with a closed-shell Ne atom. The Ml = 1 state s two determinants both have an electron in an orbital directed toward the Ne atom (the 2po orbital) as well as an electron in an orbital directed perpendicular to the C-Ne intemuclear axis (the 2pi orbital) the Ml = 0 state s two determinants have both electrons in orbitals directed perpendicular to the C-Ne axis. Because Ne is a closed-shell species, any electron density directed toward it will produce a "repulsive" antibonding interaction. As a result, we expect the Ml = 1 state to undergo a more repulsive interaction with the Ne atom than the Ml = 0 state. [Pg.274]

LJ) potential (6). The diffusing atoms also have LJ forces between them. Atoms interact with a ghost atom in the substrate that is subjected to random and dissipative forces that closely match the forces exerted by a neighboring shell of atoms in the crystal. In this way the MD computation is limited to a relatively small number of mobile atoms and their ghost atoms, and the influence of the large number of atoms in the crystal is represented by the forces applied to the ghost atom. [Pg.222]

The main handicap of MD is the knowledge of the function [/( ). There are some systems where reliable approximations to the true (7( r, ) are available. This is, for example, the case of ionic oxides. (7( rJ) is in such a case made of coulombic (pairwise) interactions and short-range terms. A second example is a closed-shell molecular system. In this case the interaction potentials are separated into intraatomic and interatomic parts. A third type of physical system for which suitable approaches to [/( r, ) exist are the transition metals and their alloys. To this class of models belong the glue model and the embedded atom method. Systems where chemical bonds of molecules are broken or created are much more difficult to describe, since the only way to get a proper description of a reaction all the way between reactant and products would be to solve the quantum-mechanical problem at each step of the reaction. [Pg.663]

Furthermore, large amplitude vibrational motions are characterized by fundamental changes in the nature of the electronic structure of the system. Dissociation of many closed shell molecules, for example HC1, transforms two atoms cohabitating in a fashion that repels electrons into a non-interacting pair of electron-attractors . c This picture suggests that molecules subjected to the rigors of large amplitude vibrational motion... [Pg.391]

Catalano et al. reported the synthesis and characterization of a new series of Pd°-based metallocrypates that bind Tl1 ion in the absence of attractive ligand interactions through metal-lophilic connections. The cationic species have been characterized by a variety of methods and have considerable stability. From the solid-state structural data it is apparent that interaction of the metal atoms with one another is the dominant bonding interaction within the metallocryptate cavity. The characterization of complexes supports the concept of metallophilic behavior as a fundamental component of bonding in closed-shell systems. These materials may ultimately serve as prototypical systems for detection of closed-shell ions 946... [Pg.650]

Hydrogen bonds may be considered special types of 3c/4e interactions, closely related to other forms of hypervalency in main-group (Section 3.5) and d-block (Section 4.6) compounds. However, the fundamental nB— oah interaction of B - HA hydrogen bonding displays unusual characteristics compared with other three-center MO phenomena, due mainly to the unique properties of the H atom, whose valence shell contains only the isotropic Is orbital for construction of ctah and ctah NBOs. [Pg.594]

The peculiar behavior of H might be relevant to understand the hydrogen bond, which deforms the electronic cloud of the proton. On the other hand, it is surprising to discover an anomalous behavior for a closed-shell atom like He. However, it has been demonstrated in helium-atom-scattering that interactions between He atoms... [Pg.340]

Green S. H. and Gordon R. G. (1974). POTLSVRF A program to compute the interaction potential energy surface between a closed-shell molecule and an atom. Quantum Chemistry Program Exchange No. 251, Indiana University. [Pg.832]


See other pages where Atomic interactions closed-shell is mentioned: [Pg.480]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.607]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.294]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.650]    [Pg.912]    [Pg.912]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.1053]    [Pg.173]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.39 ]




SEARCH



Atomic interactions

Atomic shell

Atoms shell

Closed shell

Closed-shell atoms

Closed-shell interaction

© 2024 chempedia.info