Atom-mapping method

The atom-mapping method provides a quantitative measure of the similarity between a pair of 3D molecules, A and B, that are represented by their interatomic distance matrices. The measure is calculated in two stages. First, the geometric environment of each atom in A is compared with the corresponding environment of each atom in B to determine the similarity between each possible pair of atoms. The resulting interatomic similarities are then used to identify pairs of geometrically related atoms, and these equivalences allow the calculation of the overall intermolecular similarity. 

We have not included Atom Probe Microanalysis in this scheme. It constitutes the ultimate in local analysis - in that individual atoms can be selected and identified by TOF spectroscopy. Chapter 1 gives an account of the range of applications of the technique at the present time the development in atom-probe methods has allowed the continuing increase of both the volume of material that can be mapped at the atomic scale and the quality of the data obtained. 

There are four methods for 3D data base searching distance distributions, individual distances, maximum common substructure, and atom mapping in her book, Catherine Pepperrell emphasizes the latter method, and also addresses dissimilarity (which matters when searching for new lead compounds, and one wishes to screen as many different classes as possible). 

To create a method for the automatic assignment of atom-atom mappings and reactingcentre bonds. 

As mentioned in the introduction, the RSS project is more broad than atom-atom mapping and ARCP alone. Other methods have been developed based on our procedures for atom-atom mapping. 

One method solves the problem of searching for transformations involving hydrogens. Without using atom-atom mappings, it is difficult in REACCS, for example, to search for reductions of olefins without also finding addition reactions (see Figure 8). 

The developers of CASREACT have pubhshed methods of assigning and searching both reaction centres and explicit reaction schemes. At the time of writing its user interface does not allow the assignment of atom mappings or reaction centres. CASREACT also can retrieve false hits where the direction of the arrow is reversed, similar to the limitation in ChemBase. Improvements in its user interface may resolve some of these limitations. 

An observation of the results of cross-validation revealed that all but one of the compounds in the dataset had been modeled pretty well. The last (31st) compound behaved weirdly. When we looked at its chemical structure, we saw that it was the only compound in the dataset which contained a fluorine atom. What would happen if we removed the compound from the dataset The quahty ofleaming became essentially improved. It is sufficient to say that the cross-vahdation coefficient in-CTeased from 0.82 to 0.92, while the error decreased from 0.65 to 0.44. Another learning method, the Kohonen s Self-Organizing Map, also failed to classify this 31st compound correctly. Hence, we had to conclude that the compound containing a fluorine atom was an obvious outlier of the dataset. 

The most commonly used semiempirical for describing PES s is the diatomics-in-molecules (DIM) method. This method uses a Hamiltonian with parameters for describing atomic and diatomic fragments within a molecule. The functional form, which is covered in detail by Tully, allows it to be parameterized from either ah initio calculations or spectroscopic results. The parameters must be fitted carefully in order for the method to give a reasonable description of the entire PES. Most cases where DIM yielded completely unreasonable results can be attributed to a poor fitting of parameters. Other semiempirical methods for describing the PES, which are discussed in the reviews below, are LEPS, hyperbolic map functions, the method of Agmon and Levine, and the mole-cules-in-molecules (MIM) method. 

HyperChem offers a Reaction Map facility under the Setup menu. This is needed for the synchronous transit method to match reactants and products, and depending on X (a parameter having values between 0 and 1, determining how far away from reactants structures a transition structure can be expected) will connect atoms in reactants and products and give an estimated or expected transition structure. This procedure can also be used if the eigenvector following method is later chosen for a transition state search method, i.e., if you just want to get an estimate of the transition state geometry. 

---