Asymptotic enhancement factor

Unlike the enhancement factor of Equation 14.19 or 14.20, that of the above equation refers to a terminal value r] that corresponds to the enhancement caused by an instantaneous reaction. Therefore, it is referred to as the asymptotic enhancement factor. Because this regime involves a reaction plane, it is reasonable to expect that the reaction plane will move with time. It is possible to allow for this transient situation by invoking the penetration theory (Karlsson and Bjerle, 1980). A comparison of the expressions based on the film and penetration theories shows that... 

Practicable isotopic enrichment has the following prerequisites adequately short time for the enrichment process, acceptable asymptotic enrichment factor, and adequate accuracy for the estimation of the enrichment factor. (When total activity, rather than specific activity, is limiting, one must also pay attention to losses during enrichment.) For the argon and carbon enrichments referred to above, enrichment factors of about 100 and 500 were obtained within a week and a few hours, respectively and enrichment factors were deduced from direct observations of adjacent, stable isotopes. The 14C enrichment process provided extra dividends for AMS measurement the sample was implanted in an ideal form for the accelerator ion source, and it was spatially localized (depth) which gave added signal-to-noise enhancement. 

In Chapter 14 we saw that the enhancement factor for this regime is an asymptotic value because it corresponds to the extreme case of enhancement due to an instantaneous reaction. The enhancement for no reaction is obviously one and that corresponding to any other regime will lie between these two asymptotes. 

If the reaction is very fast, then at large 7m, the enhancement factor reaches the asymptotic value... 

Therefore, further increases in reaction rate do not result in increases in absorption rate and the enhancement factor remains constant. This asymptote reflects the balance between the tendency for increases in to steepen the interfacial concentration gradient, but at the same time to increase the temperature and thereby decrease the available driving force for the absorption. Eqn (29) therefore gives a measure of the magnitude of interfacial temperature achieved by the release of heat of reaction. This measure of interfacial temperature is conservative since in Eqn (29) M refers to the case where the activation energy is zero and the reaction rate is not accelerated by the rise in interfacial temperature. 

The most severe aberrations cam be observed for the 30H SO, in the gas phase. The 13 C temperature increase for physical absorption reduces the absorption potential by a factor of almost 6, giving an enhancement factor for values of / M < 1.0 of 0.16. As / M increases, the enhancement factor is predicted to fall to am asymptote of 0.13. This is an exaunple of an increase in the reaction rate giving rise to a decrease in the absorption rate due to the adverse impact of release of heat of reaction. That this behaviour is theoretically possible can be seen from a combination of Eqns (32) and (25) whereby... 

Thus, in Fig. 12, for 10% SO in the gas phase, the advent of fast reaction results in an asymptote somewhat higher than that for physical absorption. In the case of 3% SO, the enhancement factor initially increases relatively substantially, but nevertheless still reaches an asymptote which is much very less than expected if heat release were to be ignored. For instance at /m = 10, the enhancement factor with heat release due to reaction is about 2.3, whereas it would be 10 for isothermal pseudo first order reaction. 

In this case, the enhancement factor is considered to be a simple function of the number of electrons NP The most common form for the enhancement factor, based on the asymptotic expansion of atomic kinetic energies, " is... 

The contribution of the polarization operator is logarithmically enhanced due to the logarithmic asymptotics of the polarization operator. This logarithmically enhanced contribution of the polarization operator is equal to the doubled product of the Zemach correction and the leading term in the polarization operator expansion (an extra factor two is necessary to take into account two ways to insert the polarization operator in the external photon legs in Fig. 11.1 and in Fig. 11.2)... 

For instance, in the system (Ne + Kr) " the vacancy distribution ratio may become as large as 25 10 as increases. Hence, asymptotically the L electrons of Kr are expected to be more affected than the K electrons of Ne. Indeed, it is found that the corresponding energy difference for (Ne + is enhanced by a factor of 2. This may be seen from Figure 25, which compares the relevant energy differences for the neutral and ionized systems. However, it is also seen that the respective e m s, which differ significantly at large R, approach each other near... 

Several theoretical attempts have been made recently to give a more complete description of the transport coefficients of mixtures in the critical region. Folk Moser (1993) performed dynamic renormalization-group calculations for binary mixtures near plait points and obtained nonasymptotic expressions for the kinetic coefficients. Kiselev Kulikov (1994) derived phenomenological crossover functions for the transport coefficients by factorizing the Kubo formulas for the transport coefficients a, p and y. This approach is referred to as the decoupled-mode approximation (Ferrell 1970). Their calculations yield for the thermal conductivity the expected finite enhancement in the asymptotic critical region and also a smooth crossover to the background far away from... 

---