Apparent second virial coefficient definition

Special care has to be taken if the polymer is only soluble in a solvent mixture or if a certain property, e.g., a definite value of the second virial coefficient, needs to be adjusted by adding another solvent. In this case the analysis is complicated due to the different refractive indices of the solvent components [32]. In case of a binary solvent mixture we find, that formally Equation (42) is still valid. The refractive index increment needs to be replaced by an increment accounting for a complex formation of the polymer and the solvent mixture, when one of the solvents adsorbs preferentially on the polymer. Instead of measuring the true molar mass Mw the apparent molar mass Mapp is measured. How large the difference is depends on the difference between the refractive index increments ([dn/dc) — (dn/dc)A>0. (dn/dc)fl is the increment determined in the mixed solvents in osmotic equilibrium, while (dn/dc)A0 is determined for infinite dilution of the polymer in solvent A. For clarity we omitted the fixed parameters such as temperature, T, and pressure, p. 

The simplification introduced by restricting the rods to three discrete orientations will now be apparent. The rods must intersect only in those three directions, so that the cluster integrals in three dimensions can be factorized into products of cluster integrals in one dimension. Consider for example the second virial coefficient for parallel rods. By definition... 

Very recently. Beer [283] reinvestigated identical samples and similarly prepar ones even more carefully and could impressively demonstrate the increase of Rg,app at low Cp to follow from the definition of the apparent radius of gyration by Eq. (4.22) if the second virial coefficient becomes anomalously large, i.e., Ke/Re at c = Cp is much larger than Kc/Re = 0 at Cp = 0. Defining an apparent radius of gyration as... 

Interpretation of the second and third virial coefficients, A2 and A3, in terms of Floiy-Huggins theory is apparent from Eq. (3.82). The second virial coefl[icient A2 evidently is a measure of the interaction between a solvent and a polymer. When A2 happens to be zero, Eq. (3.82) simplifies greatly and many thermodynamic measurements become much easier to interpret. Such solutions with vanishing A2 may, however, be called pseudoideal solutions, to distinguish them from ideal solutions for which activities are equal to the molar fractions. Inspection of Eq. (3.83) reveals that A2 vanishes when the interaction parameter X equal to. We should also recall that %, according to its definition given by Eq. (3.40), is inversely proportional to temperature T. Since x is positive for most polymer-solvent systems, it should acquire the value at some specific temperature. 

---