Antiprotons

It accelerates both protons and antiprotons to an energy of about 1 trillion electron volts (TeV). 

At this energy, the protons and antiprotons have a speed almost as great as the speed of light, which is 300,000 kilometers per second. The 5. difference in speed is only about one part in 2 million. 

C22-0039. Compute the energy released in joules per event and in kilojoules per mole when antiprotons (the antimatter corresponding to protons) annihilate with protons. 

Figure 8. Longitudinal momentum distribution for single ionization of helium by 945-keV antiproton (data points) in comparison with proton collision (full curve), (a) Electron momentum data [26] (b) recoil-ion data [26], The theoretical calculations represent antiproton collisions dotted curve, CDW results [26] broken curve, CTMC result [26], Here pze and pzr are equivalent to the notation of pey and pRy of Figs. 1 and 2, respectively.

Anti-protonic atoms. Recently neutron density distributions in a series of nuclei were deduced from anti-protonic atoms [30], The basic method determines the ratio of neutron and proton distributions at large differences by means of a measurement of the annihilation products which indicates whether the antiproton was captured on a neutron or a proton. In the analysis two assumptions are made. First a best fit value for the ratio I / of the imaginary parts of the free space pp and pn scattering lengths equal to unity is adopted. Secondly in order to reduce the density ratio at the annihilation side to a a ratio of rms radii a two-parameter Fermi distribution is assumed. The model dependence introduced by these assumptions is difficult to judge. Since a large number of nuclei have been measured one may argue that the value of Rj is fixed empirically. 

While more than a handful theoretical schemes are available to nonpermrba-tively evaluate the Barkas-Andersen correction quantum mechanically, binary stopping theory developed recently [32] fulfills the task on the basis of the Bohr stopping model the only quantum feature added is the inverse-Bloch correction (18) which does not differentiate between particle and antiparticle. Figure 4 demonstrates that with regard to comparison with experimental antiproton stopping data, classical theory is fully competitive with various quantum theories. 

Fig. 4. Stopping of antiprotons in Si comparison of experimental data [25] with theoretical predictions [25-29]. From Ref. [29].

Both protons and antiprotons are made of quarks. When their quarks collide, there is evidence of smaller particles. Quarks are hypothetical entities that carry very small electrical charges. They are considered the major constituents of the smallest bits of matter. Both quarks and leptons (several lighter atomic elementary particles) are the basic building blocks of mat-... 

On the most fundamental level, we have shown how this experimental scheme might be used for a fundamental test of CPT symmetry violation [8]. While still somewhat hypothetical, at present, this would constitute the most sensitive currently proposed test on CPT symmetry. The sensitivity expressed as a baryon mass difference Am between particles and antiparticles (with mass m) would be of the order of Am/m = 10"30 [8]. The best currently proposed other experiment is on antihydrogen spectroscopy at CERN (not yet carried out) with Am/m = 10 18, and the best existing result for the proton-antiproton pair is Am/m < 10 9 [9]. 

The principle of charge conjugation symmetry states that if each particle in a given system is replaced by its corresponding antiparticle, then it would not be possible to tell the difference, For example, if in a hydrogen atom the proton is replaced by an antiproton and the electron is replaced by a positron, then this antimatter atom will behave exactly like an ordinary atom—if observed by persons also made of antimatter. - In an antimatter universe, the laws of nature could not be distinguished from the laws of an ordinary mailer universe. 

When a particle and its antiparticle, such as an electron and a positron, or a proton and an antiproton, are used in head-on collision experiments, acceleration of the particles can be accomplished in one ring. This is because electrons and positrons, for example, behave m the same way in terms of their response to magnetic and electric fields. Thus, both particles can be injected into the same ring, one to follow an orbit in a clockwise direction the other in a counterclockwise direction. Upon injection of a cluster of each type of particle, collisions occur at two points diametrically opposed. This arrangement provides maximum utilization of the equipment. 

Peterson, I. Quantum Interference," Science News, 363 (December 2, 1989). Peterson, I. Protons and Antiprotons Held in the Balance, Science News, 38 (July... 

A few years later the antielectron was found, and almost 30 years later, the antiproton. Antimatter indeed exists in nature, as Dirac predicted from Einstein s work. This theoretical prediction was one of the greatest intellectual achievements of science. Today, beams of antimatter are produced in many laboratories they run in carefully evacuated tubes m order not to hit any ordinary matter until they reach their target, where they annihilate with the target substance. 

Sufficient atomic particle research has been accomplished to warrant discussion of possible methods of applying energy available from particle mass annihilation to rocket propulsion. Complete conversion of matter to energy would allow exhaust velocities near that of light to be obtained from a propulsion device. Antimatter, by definition is matter made up of antiparticles, such as antineutrons, negatrons (antiprotons), and positrons (anheledrons). An annihilation property is known to exist between particles with one particle termed the anhparticle of the other. 

Like the leptons, there is a number conservation law for baryons. To each baryon, such as the neutron or proton, we assign a baryon number B = +1 while we assign B = — 1 to each antibaryon, such as the antiproton. Our rule is that the total baryon number must be conserved in any process. Consider the reaction... 

---