Amplitude Response — Second-Order System

Figure 5.12 Sinusoidal response amplitude of a second-order system after exponential terms have become negligible.

The first term on the right-hand side of eqn. (11) decays away and, after a time approximately equal to 5t, the second term alone will remain. Note that this is a sine wave of the same frequency as the forcing function, but that its amplitude is reduced and its phase is shifted. This second term is called the frequency response of the system such responses are often characterised by observing how the amplitude ratio and phase lag between the input and output sine waves vary as a function of the input frequency, k. To recover the system RTD from frequency response data is more complex tnan with step or impulse tests, but nonetheless is possible. Gibilaro et al. [22] have described a short-cut route which enables low-order system moments to be determined from frequency response tests, these in turn approximately defining the system transfer function G(s) [see eqn. (A.5), Appendix 1]. From G(s), the RTD can be determined as in eqn. (8). 

As a consequence, field methods, which consist of computing the energy or dipole moment of the system for external electric field of different amplitudes and then evaluating their first, second derivatives with respect to the field amplitude numerically, cannot be applied. Similarly, procedures such as the coupled-perturbed Hartree-Fock (CPHF) or time-dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) approaches which determine the first-order response of the density matrix with respect to the perturbation cannot be applied due to the breakdown of periodicity. 

The general relations among the coefficients - and Dy are presented elsewhere [179]. The quantities yj and y2 are the damping constants for the fundamental and second- harmonic modes, respectively. In Eq.(82) we shall restrict ourselves to the case of zero-frequency mismatch between the cavity and the external forces (ff>i — ff> = 0). In this way we exclude the rapidly oscillating terms. Moreover, the time x and the external amplitude have been redefined as follows x = Kf and 8F =. The s ordering in Eq.(80) which is responsible for the operator structure of the Hamiltonian allows us to contrast the classical and quantum dynamics of our system. If the Hamiltonian (77)-(79) is classical (i.e., if it is a c number), then the equation for the probability density has the form of Eq.(80) without the s terms ... 

Eight seconds of time domain integration were performed with each sinusoidal force input in order to obtain the system response. The integration time step utilized was 512 points per second. One hundred frequencies were evaluated in the range from 1 to 50 Hz. Five different peak force amplitudes were also utilized. For the three damper characteristics studied this gives a total of 1500 integration runs. 

---