Alumina binding energy

Routinely used X-ray sources are Mg Ka (1253.6 eV) and A1 Ka (1486.3 eV). In XPS one measures the intensity of photoelectrons N(E) as a function of their kinetic energy. The XPS spectrum, however, is usually a plot of N(E) versus Ek, or, more often, versus the binding energy Eb. Figure 3.3 shows the XPS spectrum of an alumina-supported rhodium catalyst, prepared by impregnating the support with... 

Figure 9.3 Rh 3d5/2 binding energy versus particle size for half spherical rhodium particles on an alumina support (data from Huizinga el al. [14], and from Kip et al. [15], see also Fig. 6.18).

Table 2.1 shows the top site chemisorption energy for the adsorption of CO onto the Pt/Oj-a-alumina system as a function of metal layers, relative to Pt (111). For the monolayer of metal on the surface there is an enhancement of the CO top site binding energy relative to Pt (111). On the other hand, the second layer of Pt/Ox shows a dramatic decrease in the top site chemisorption energy. For three layers of Pt on this surface, the chemisorption energy oscillates above the Pt (111) energy, eventually returning to the Pt (111) value for n > A. 

The characterization technique of CO Temperature-Programmed Desorption has been studied with Pt reforming catalysts. Critical factors in the experimental procedure and the catalyst pretreatment conditions were examined. The CO desorption spectrum consists mainly of two peaks which are probably combinations of other peaks and the result of various binding energy states of CO to Pt. These in turn could be due either to the interaction between Pt and the alumina support or the results of high and low coordination sites on the Pt crystallites. No significant relationship between the character of the CO desorption profile and the activity of commercial catalysts was observed. 

Table 8.2 The affect of unit cell size on calculated binding energy for a-alumina.

---