Alternative polymer matrixes

Horst mechanism of PVC stabilization. In fact, based on his observations Naqvi [134] has proposed an alternative model for the degradation and stabilization of PVC based on polar interactions within the polymer matrix, which will be discussed in the following section (Section VI). 

Naqvi [134] has proposed an alternative model to the Frye and Horst mechanism for the degradation and stabilization of PVC. At room temperature, PVC is well below its glass transition temperature (about 81°C). The low thermal stability of the polymer may be due to the presence of undesirable concentrations of like-poles in the more or less frozen matrix with strong dipoles. Such concentrations, randomly distributed in the polymer matrix, may be considered to constitute weak or high energy spots in the polymer, the possible sites of initiation of thermal dehydrochlorination. 

Alternatives to compounding in the melt are solution mixing or powder blending of solid particles. Mixing with the aid of solvents can be performed at lower temperatures with minimal shear. However, difficulties in removal of the solvent results in plasticization of tJie polymer matrix and altered erosion/drug release performance in addition to residual solvent toxicity concerns. Powder blending at room temperature minimizes thermal/shear stresses, but achieving intimate mixtures is difficult. 

For the analysis of nonvolatile compounds, on-line coupled microcolumn SEC-PyGC has been described [979]. Alternatively, on-line p,SEC coupled to a conventional-size LC system can be used for separation and quantitative determination of compounds, in which volatility may not allow analysis via capillary GC [976]. An automated SEC-gradient HPLC flow system for polymer analysis has been developed [980]. The high sample loading capacity available in SEC makes it an attractive technique for intermediate sample cleanup [981] prior to a more sensitive RPLC technique. Hence, this intermediate step is especially interesting for experimental purposes whenever polymer matrix interference cannot be separated from the peak of interest. Coupling of SEC to RPLC is expected to benefit from the miniaturised approach in the first dimension (no broadening). Development of the first separation step in SEC-HPLC is usually quite short, unless problems are encountered with sample/column compatibility. 

Also, the usefulness of IR analysis of dissolved polymer/additive matrices is thus quite restricted. When the specific additive used is known when only qualitative results are required and when the polymer matrix is appropriate, FUR can provide a much easier, faster alternative to NMR spectroscopy. A rare example of additive analysis in dissolution by means of infrared has been reported for PE/oleamide [43]. 

The use of polymeric coatings in catalysis is mainly restricted to the physical and sometimes chemical immobilization of molecular catalysts into the bulk polymer [166, 167]. The catalytic efficiency is often impaired by the local reorganization of polymer attached catalytic sites or the swelling/shrinking of the entire polymer matrix. This results in problems of restricted mass transport and consequently low efficiency of the polymer-supported catalysts. An alternative could be a defined polymer coating on a solid substrate with equally accessible catalytic sites attached to the polymer (side chain) and uniform behavior of the polymer layer upon changes in the environment, such as polymer brushes. 

Although a majority of these composite thermistors are based upon carbon black as the conductive filler, it is difficult to control in terms of particle size, distribution, and morphology. One alternative is to use transition metal oxides such as TiO, VO2, and V2O3 as the filler. An advantage of using a ceramic material is that it is possible to easily control critical parameters such as particle size and shape. Typical polymer matrix materials include poly(methyl methacrylate) PMMA, epoxy, silicone elastomer, polyurethane, polycarbonate, and polystyrene. 

As Fig. 15b illustrates, the graphical relation appears to be linear for an interaction number of 3 to 4, if A 1. Alternatively, for A = 1, linearity is evident (Fig. 15c) when the interaction number is 5 to 6. Thus a large value of A is compatible with the smallest interaction number. Excimer formation occurs within the fluorescence lifetime, about 8 nsec. Within that time the pyrene-labeled amine side chains must approach within about 4 A of each other. For the 5.3% pyrenylpolyethylenimine derivative in ethanol, where no ground-state association occurs, the effective local concentration of pyrene on the polymer matrix is about 10-2 M, as calculated from excimer fluorescence. In aqueous solution, where clusters form within the polymer matrix, the effective local concentration of pyrene adduct must be even greater. The quantitative assessment of fluorescence intensities (Fig. 15) points to a minimum interaction number of 3 to 4 pyrenyl-labeled amine side chains, within the 8 nsec lifetime. Since A 1, it appears from (12) that kDM(A) kMD + kD. Thus excimer formation must be very rapid in the polymer environment. We can conclude, therefore, that the primary-amine side chains of poly-ethylenimine are very flexible and mobile. 

---