Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Adsorption molecular weight effect

Fig. 22. Molecular weight effect of synthetic polymer adsorption. Molecular weight (MW) distribution of poly(vinyl chloride) in solution and in the adsorbed layer at equilibrium. Note that the adsorbed material has a higher average MW than the bulk solution (from Ref.1001, p. 120)... Fig. 22. Molecular weight effect of synthetic polymer adsorption. Molecular weight (MW) distribution of poly(vinyl chloride) in solution and in the adsorbed layer at equilibrium. Note that the adsorbed material has a higher average MW than the bulk solution (from Ref.1001, p. 120)...
Rebar VA, Santore MM. Molecular weight effects and the sequential dynamic nature of poly(ethyleneoxide) adsorption on silica from polydisperse aqueous solution. Macromolecules 1996 29 6273—6283. [Pg.303]

Some GPC analysts use totally excluded, rather than totally permeated, flow markers to make flow rate corrections. Most of the previously mentioned requirements for totally permeated flow marker selection still are requirements for a totally excluded flow marker. Coelution effects can often be avoided in this approach. It must be pointed out that species eluting at the excluded volume of a column set are not immune to adsorption problems and may even have variability issues arising from viscosity effects of these necessarily higher molecular weight species from the column. [Pg.550]

Electrostatic and adsorption effects conspire to make aqueous GPC more likely to be nonideal than organic solvent GPC. Thus, universal calibration is often not obeyed in aqueous systems. Elence, it is much more critical that the standard chosen for calibration share with the polymer being analyzed chemical characteristics that affect these interactions. Because standards that meet this criterion are often not available, it is prudent to include in each analysis set a sample of a secondary standard of the same composition and molecular weight as the sample. Thus, changes in the chromatography of the analyte relative to the standards will be detected. [Pg.557]

In 1971, Hiatt et al. found that polyethylene oxide (PEO) of molecular weight about 100000 prevented the adsorption of rabies virus to porous glass with an average pore diameter of 1250 A. The support was modified by passage of one void volume of 0.4% solution of the polymer in water, followed by 5 or more volumes of distilled water or buffered salt solution. The virus was effectively purified from the admixtures of brain tissue fluid by means of size-exclusion chromatography on the modified glass column [28]. [Pg.143]

According to the concepts, given in the paper [7], a significant difference between the values of yield stress of equiconcentrated dispersions of mono- and polydisperse polymers and the effect of molecular weight of monodisperse polymers on the value of yield stress is connected with the specific adsorption on the surface of filler particles of shorter molecules, so that for polydisperse polymers (irrespective of their average molecular weight) this is the layer of the same molecules. At the same time, upon a transition to a number of monodisperse polymers, properties of the adsorption layer become different. [Pg.79]

The mechanisms that affect heat transfer in single-phase and two-phase aqueous surfactant solutions is a conjugate problem involving the heater and liquid properties (viscosity, thermal conductivity, heat capacity, surface tension). Besides the effects of heater geometry, its surface characteristics, and wall heat flux level, the bulk concentration of surfactant and its chemistry (ionic nature and molecular weight), surface wetting, surfactant adsorption and desorption, and foaming should be considered. [Pg.65]

Silica gels with mean pore diameters of 5-15 nm and surface areas of 150-600 m /g have been preferred for the separation of low molecular weight samples, while silica gels with pore diameters greater than 30 nm are preferred for the separation, of biopolymers to avoid restricting the accessibility of the solutes to the stationary phase [15,16,29,34]. Ideally, the pore size distribution should be narrow and symmetrical about the mean value. Micropores are particularly undesirable as they may give rise to size-exclusion effects or irreversible adsorption due to... [Pg.164]


See other pages where Adsorption molecular weight effect is mentioned: [Pg.688]    [Pg.697]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.532]    [Pg.571]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.290]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.806]    [Pg.813]    [Pg.823]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.385]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.533]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.590]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.623]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.161 ]




SEARCH



3, molecular adsorption

Adsorption effect

Effective molecular weight

Molecular weight effect

© 2024 chempedia.info