Accuracy, adsorption energies

Fig. 5(a) contains the oxygen and hydrogen density profiles it demonstrates clearly the major differences between the water structure next to a metal surface and near a free or nonpolar surface (compare to Fig. 3). Due to the significant adsorption energy of water on transition metal surfaces (typically of the order of 20-50kJmoP see, e.g., [136]), strong density oscillations are observed next to the metal. Between three and four water layers have also been identified in most simulations near uncharged metal surfaces, depending on the model and on statistical accuracy. Beyond about...

We see that the terms that differ for various adlayer structures do not depend on the systematic error a. These terms are also the ones that contain the lateral interactions. This means that the systematic error does not affect the lateral interactions. They depend only on the smaller random errors p . This means that lateral interactions can be determined better than one might suppose having some idea of the accuracy with which one can compute adsorption energies with DFT. The systematic errors cause only a shift in l s-... 

In all cases at least two of these forces act simultaneously a summation of their contributions to the adsorption energy over all participant atoms has to be made for each of the participating forces separately. Such a summation can in principle be applied with any desired degree of accuracy to some of the forces mentioned, provided that the distances between the participating atoms are exactly known. 

This study demonstrates the ability of IGC, at finite concentration conditions, to determine quickly (within one or two days depending on the desired accuracy) water adsorption isotherms, with relative pressures ranging from 0 to 0.85. Moreover, IGC provides isotherms made up of several hundreds of experimental points. This permits the computation of meaningful adsorption energy distribution functions. 

In this paper, a modified HK method is presented which accounts for spatial variations in the density profile of a fluid (argon) adsorbed within a carbon slit pore. We compare the pore width/filling pressure correlations predicted by the original HK method, the modified HK method, and methods based upon statistical thermodynamics (density functional theory and Monte Carlo molecular simulation). The inclusion of the density profile weighting in the HK adsorption energy calculation improves the agreement between the HK model and the predictions of the statistical thermodynamics methods. Although the modified Horvath-Kawazoe adsorption model lacks the quantitative accuracy of the statistical thermodynamics approaches, it is numerically convenient for ease of application, and it has a sounder molecular basis than analytic adsorption models derived from the Kelvin equation. 

Measurement of the adsorption energies and entropies on the basis of the Second Law of thermodynamics is not feasible in the radiochemistry of TAEs. In general, the difficulties in the production of the attainable nuclides and their radioactive properties impose strong limitations on the allowable experimental conditions. It is unfortunate because the method guarantees much better accuracy (veracity) of the numerical values than that expected with the calculated entropies. 

Another pertinent question is related to the accuracy of the common approximation to describe relativistic effects at the pseudopotential level. Our AE scalar relativistic DKH scheme allows to evaluate the precision of the latter scheme. A relativistic pseudopotential [196] was utilized to treat the heavy element Pd in the Pd-0 complexes employing extended EPE-embedded cluster models of the quality comparable to that for the AE cluster model. This resulted in the adsorption energy value 123 kJ/mol and the Pd-0 bond length 213 pm. For the Pd-0 complexes under scrutiny the deviations from the corresponding scalar relativistic values, by 3 kJ/mol and 2 pm respectively, are rather small. Clearly, relativistic pseudopotentials for heavier atoms have to be constructed with due care [8]. The AE scalar relativistic DKH approach certainly provides an attractive alternative. 

Typical accuracy of the calculated adsorption energy + 1.0 eV overbinding +0.3 eV overbinding 0.2 eV -0.3 eV under-binding... 

Theoretical description of the chemisorption bond and calculation of adsorption energies are nowadays mainly based on application of density functional theory (DFT) [28]. This approach has developed to a computational strategy of comparable accuracy to the traditional correlated quantum chemical methods, but at much lower costs, and is now widely used to calculate bond energies to fairly high accuracy comparable to experimental data [29], but sometimes also at variance [30]. 

A comparison between experimental adsorption energies for different adsorbates on different metal surfaces estimated from UHV temperature-programmed desorption studies and those calculated using density functional theory is shown in Fig. 1.1a. Although this is a very useful first step, the differences are certainly not within the 5 kJ/mol engineering accuracy that one would like. Figure 1. lb shows a comparison between HREELS and DFT calculated vibrational frequencies for maleic anhydride adsorbed on Pd(lll). 

---