Which Average Molecular Weight

We have seen that average molecular weight is not unique. It turns out that there 

But we re sure you are starting to get sick of molecular weight, so let s leave the definitions there. However, there are methods for measuring number and weight average (also z-average, although this is harder) and you 

FIGURE 2-27 Graph of the fraction of chains versus the degree of polymerization. 

---

Size exclusion chromatography provides the distribution of molecular sizes from which average molecular weights can be calculated with the formulas summarized in Chapter 2. SEC is not a primary method as usually practiced it requires... 

Table 3.1 summarizes the various methods described in this chapter for the experimental determination of sizes and shapes of molecules, indicating which average molecular weight is determined when there is a mixture of macromolecules. The range of molecular weights satisfactorily covered by the different types of investigation is also stated. 

The question then arises, since mbber polymers have a distribution of molecular weights, which average molecular weight should be used to establish the dependence of viscosity. Fox and coworkers found that the weight average molecular weight, M, best described the dependence of viscosity on molecular weight ... 

This result shows that the square root of the amount by which the ratio M /M exceeds unity equals the standard deviation of the distribution relative to the number average molecular weight. Thus if a distribution is characterized by M = 10,000 and a = 3000, then M /M = 1.09. Alternatively, if M / n then the standard deviation is 71% of the value of M. This shows that reporting the mean and standard deviation of a distribution or the values of and Mw/Mn gives equivalent information about the distribution. We shall see in a moment that the second alternative is more easily accomplished for samples of polymers. First, however, consider the following example in which we apply some of the equations of this section to some numerical data. 

The phenomena we discuss, phase separation and osmotic pressure, are developed with particular attention to their applications in polymer characterization. Phase separation can be used to fractionate poly disperse polymer specimens into samples in which the molecular weight distribution is more narrow. Osmostic pressure experiments can be used to provide absolute values for the number average molecular weight of a polymer. Alternative methods for both fractionation and molecular weight determination exist, but the methods discussed in this chapter occupy a place of prominence among the alternatives, both historically and in contemporary practice. 

In the next section we shall describe the use of Eq. (8.83) to determine the number average molecular weight of a polymer, and in subsequent sections we shall examine models which offer interpretations of the second virial coefficient. 

The first quantitative model, which appeared in 1971, also accounted for possible charge-transfer complex formation (45). Deviation from the terminal model for bulk polymerization was shown to be due to antepenultimate effects (46). Mote recent work with numerical computation and C-nmr spectroscopy data on SAN sequence distributions indicates that the penultimate model is the most appropriate for bulk SAN copolymerization (47,48). A kinetic model for azeotropic SAN copolymerization in toluene has been developed that successfully predicts conversion, rate, and average molecular weight for conversions up to 50% (49). 

The width of molecular weight distribution (MWD) is usually represented by the ratio of the weight—average and the number—average molecular weights, MJM. In iadustry, MWD is often represented by the value of the melt flow ratio (MER), which is calculated as a ratio of two melt indexes measured at two melt pressures that differ by a factor of 10. Most commodity-grade LLDPE resias have a narrow MWD, with the MJM ratios of 2.5—4.5 and MER values in the 20—35 range. However, LLDPE resias produced with chromium oxide-based catalysts have a broad MWD, with M.Jof 10—35 and MER of 80-200. 

---