Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Weak nuclear frequency factor

Anisotropic A, with principal values b Apart from the spin flip lines due to weak dipolar coupling with distant H atoms of the matrix this case is rare at X-band and lower frequencies, but may become of interest for measurements at high microwave frequency bands. The situation is most likely to occur for species with anisotropic hyperfine couplings of moderate size due to nuclei with large nuclear g-factors like or F. The effective field acting on the nucleus is dominated by the applied field, so that a and the normal selection rule Ami = 0 applies. The splitting between the lines is AT = 1 A 1 and A g = 1 Ag 1 for isotropic and anisotropic g-factors, respectively. [Pg.201]

The semi-classical Marcus equation derives from quantum-mechanical treatments of the Marcus model, which consider in wave-mechanical terms the overlap of electronic wave-functions in the donor-acceptor system, and the effects of this overlap on electronic and nuclear motions (see Section 9.1.2.8 above). Such treatments are essential for a satisfactory theory of D-A systems in which the interaction between the reactant and product free-energy profiles is relatively weak, such as non-adiabatic reactions. A full quantum-mechanical treatment, unfortunately, is cumbrous and (since the wave-functions are not accurately known) difficult to relate to experimental measurements but one can usefully test equations based on simplified versions. In a well-known treatment of this type, leading to the semi-classical Marcus equation introduced in Section 9.1.2.8, the vibrational motions of the atomic nuclei in the reactant molecule (as well as the motions of the transferring electron) are treated wave-mechanically, while the solvent vibrations (usually of low frequency) are treated classically. The resulting equation, already quoted (Equation (9.25)), is identical in form with the classical equation (9.16) (Section 9.1.2.5), except that the factor... [Pg.299]


See other pages where Weak nuclear frequency factor is mentioned: [Pg.226]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.1180]    [Pg.1179]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.346]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.645]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.737]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.22 ]




SEARCH



Frequency factor

Nuclear factor

Nuclear frequency

Nuclear frequency factor

© 2024 chempedia.info